Nonilex, to Law
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

is hearing a challenge today to a federal prosecutors used to charge >350 people who attacked the Capitol on .
>100 have been convicted & sentenced under the statute for obstructing or impeding an ofcl proceeding—the joint session that convened to confirm Biden’s victory.

The case could impact ’s federal trial in DC for trying to remain in power, 2 charges he faces are based on the same statute.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2024/04/16/supreme-court-jan-6-obstruction-case-trump-rioters/

Nonilex,
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

The word ‘’ in the statute & why it matters The includes a penalty of up to 20 yrs in for anyone who “corruptly — (1) alters, destroys, mutilates, or conceals a record, document, or other object, or attempts to do so, with the intent to impair the object’s integrity or availability for use in an official proceeding; or (2) otherwise obstructs, influences, or impedes any official proceeding, or attempts to do so.”

Nonilex,
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

Solicitor General Elizabeth B. Prelogar, defending the , told in filings that the second clause should be read as a “catchall” that ensures unanticipated methods of obstructing an official proceeding are prohibited. The word “” means “in a different manner,” Prelogar wrote, & makes clear that Congress intended to prohibit obstruction broadly, beyond the destruction of records or documents listed in the first section of the .

Nonilex,
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

For & , past case is roadblock to siding with rioters A case from 2008 was brought up repeatedly during today’s oral argument, & it helps explain why the votes of the court’s conservatives are hard to predict.
In Begay v. United States, ruled that the word “” in the Armed Career Act could not cover drunken driving convictions, because it was not similar enough to the other examples listed— “burglary, arson, or extortion” or “use of explosives.”

Nonilex,
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

Chief Justice ruled in favor of that narrower reading.But Justices & , the only other 2justices who are still on the court today, did not.In a dissent written by Alito,they said reading “” to mean “limited to”equally purposeful, aggressive acts “does not follow the statutory language.” When asked what earlier case best supported his argument that of Congress only covers evidence tampering,Green responded:“Begay is our best case for sure.”

mcc, to random
@mcc@mastodon.social avatar

Fascinating both for what it says about dev & what it says about statistics:

A gamedev realized Linux users were just 5.8% of their sales, but represented 38% of bug reports.

Then they looked at those numbers closer, and realized. Linux users were not experiencing more bugs. Almost none of the Linux-user bugs were Linux-related. Linux users were simply more likely to file bugs.

Their conclusion: A linux port pays for itself bc it nerdsnipes ppl into giving u free QA

https://techhub.social/@ozone89/111337250473454154

PSiReN,

@mcc

That is ; is there any on the of those ; i.e. what of those were ...? Or, is the below merely ... , we're not for a .

🧙⚔️🤖🐺🤖⚔️🧙 | ☕🎠🦹🦄🦹🎠☕

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • JUstTest
  • kavyap
  • DreamBathrooms
  • thenastyranch
  • ngwrru68w68
  • tacticalgear
  • magazineikmin
  • Youngstown
  • khanakhh
  • rosin
  • slotface
  • InstantRegret
  • everett
  • mdbf
  • Leos
  • cisconetworking
  • cubers
  • modclub
  • GTA5RPClips
  • ethstaker
  • osvaldo12
  • Durango
  • provamag3
  • normalnudes
  • tester
  • anitta
  • megavids
  • lostlight
  • All magazines