@FinchHaven@hachyderm.io
@FinchHaven@hachyderm.io avatar

FinchHaven

@FinchHaven@hachyderm.io

Linux since 1995. Radical Progressive-Leftist. Photographer. Social content consumer, not a social content creator. Hachy

Loc: Swift Water lands, Salish Sea, Cascadia, North America

whoami: MadokVaur @ Twitch Discord and Github

-r--r--r-- on Teh Tweeters since November 2, 2022

#NoSearch #NoIndex #NoBot #NoBridge

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

darren, to threads
@darren@c.im avatar

Is anyone aware of a bot that counting the number of federated accounts? Just curious about the uptake by Threads users. Out of their puported hundred million users, I would anectdotally guess about 1000 users have voluntarily federated, but maybe you know better than me?

FinchHaven,
@FinchHaven@hachyderm.io avatar

@darren

There is this, for what it's worth

"Popular Fediverse Accounts: The most popular accounts across the fediverse"

Here: https://fedidb.org/popular-fediverse-accounts

It claims to cover both and the /

I can't comment on the accuracy or credibility of the data collection methods used

stefan, (edited ) to fediverse
@stefan@stefanbohacek.online avatar

Trying to run a little experiment and want to make sure my understanding is correct.

If I post something on my fediverse server, assuming it takes some time to reach all of my followers' servers, does that post get inserted into their feeds as if posted at the original time, or rather on top of their feed, but with the original timestamp?

#fediverse #mastodon #FediAdmins #MastoAdmins

FinchHaven,
@FinchHaven@hachyderm.io avatar

@stefan

Firefox is showing me a "timestamp" of 19 min out at my (unrefreshed) home feed

I see a timestamp of May 05, 2024, 08:18 on your opened post

It's Sunday 05/05/2024 08:41:46 PDT as I type this

For what that's worth...

elCelio, to mastodon Italian
@elCelio@mastodon.uno avatar

Most followed accounts:

  1. threads.net
  2. threads.net
  3. threads.net
  4. threads.net
  5. threads.net
  6. Mastodon@mastodon.social
  7. threads.net
  8. threads.net
  9. georgetakei@universeodon.com
  10. threads.net
  11. threads.net
  12. Gargron@mastodon.social
  13. threads.net
  14. threads.net
  15. neilhimself@mastodon.social
  16. rbreich@masto.ai
  17. threads.net
  18. threads.net
  19. threads.net
  20. threads.net

Source:
https://most-followed-mastodon-accounts.stefanhayden.com/

video/mp4

FinchHaven,
@FinchHaven@hachyderm.io avatar

@elCelio

So

Somebody's ripping-off the guy who runs ?

Quite an accomplishment

Stealing another web site's data

How 1990s

FinchHaven,
@FinchHaven@hachyderm.io avatar

@elCelio

Then which data is credible?

FinchHaven,
@FinchHaven@hachyderm.io avatar

@elCelio

Which begs the question:

If the data is "different" because it's produced by "different methods" why pay any attention to any of it?

anthracite, to random

Thank you for all the effort you put into this “FESP”. I would like to respectfully suggest that this proposal is missing some major elements of the procedure that I apply in my regular activities as the administrator of a small Mastodon instance, which has been running since 2017.

This existing proposal does a decent job of outlining a sensible workflow for automatically applying blocklists, but has absolutely nothing related to how much I trust various blocklists, which I feel is a critical part of any automated or semi-automated solution. Let me explain.

I trust certain people to make good decisions about moderation.

There are some admins who have a long history of always making decisions that are well-documented; if I see them make a post to then I will probably just say “hey, thanks for your work, cool admin”, and go block whatever sites they suggested.

I trust other people to make bad decisions about moderation.

There are some admins who have a history of getting into arguments and calling for a on the entire site the person they’re arguing with. There are some admins who are in between these, whose decisions I usually agree with but always look into for myself.

I trust some people to make actively terrible decisions about moderation.

There are some admins whose posts to are a clear and obvious signal that they are the sorts of people I would block - which I usually do - and that anyone they suggest blocking is probably someone I want to avoid blocking.

This proposal has no concept of the relative trustworthiness of its blocklist sources, and in fact recommends the default acceptance of a blocklist source that combines several sources I trust to make bad decisions.

What is needed is a way for a user to rank their trust in each and every blocklist source, and define thresholds for being alerted about potential new block-worthy sites, and for sites being automatically blocked.

A simple way to do this would be for the user to assign a numerical ranking to each blocklist source. List A, run by my best buddy of thirty years, who I trust implicitly? They get, oh, 10. Lists B1, B2, and B3, who share my general values? They all get a 3. Lists D1, D2, and D3, run by people who I think are are sometimes right but prone to making impulsive decisions? They get a 1. Lists F1, F2, and F3, who are constantly making minor dumb suggestions? -1. List Z, run by people who want me and everyone like me to not exist? -10.

And then I would choose where my thresholds are. With the above example sources, I might choose a collective trust of 9 for “block this automatically”, and a collective trust of 3 for “suggest this block”. If A suggests any block, then I just apply it. Same with B1/2/3 all agreeing, or B1/3 agreeing and all of D1/2/3 concurring. And if some B/D-tier sources suggest it, then I would get this new possibly-blockworthy place shown to me.

Some small further extensions, perhaps: I might want to always have any block suggested by B2 or D1/2/3 held for manual review, even if my total trust in this suggestion is well over my threshold for auto-block. And the case of A and Z suggesting the same site, for a total score of 0, is an interesting one - perhaps positive and negative scores should be summed up separately, and anything with a positive score that crosses the “suggest block/autoblock” thresholds should be presented as a suggestion, with a note that this one might be an interesting one that I’ll want to deal with when I have time to sit down and ponder nuance.

Anyway. There you go. The Fediverse is decentralized and any suggestion for sharing blocklists should also be decentralized, and should recognize that the people who compile these lists are humans, who I may have varying degrees of trust in. As written this proposal feels inherently centralized; it’s trying to replicate workarounds for the incredibly centralized corporate-owned social networks of the past decades, without any thought given to the inherently anarchic nature of federation. It’s also suggesting the enshrining of a centralized blocklist put together from multiple people with a track record of admin decisions that is spotty, at best. Any solution that proposes nothing but thebad.space as a source of its decisions is inherently flawed.

-@anthracite

(https://docs.google.com/document/d/17YmAvRbk_wf6RhWhFbRya9SvUMpoY2s4ZRnt9bqLtwA/edit?usp=sharing)

FinchHaven,
@FinchHaven@hachyderm.io avatar

@anthracite

Also see:

"and in fact recommends the default acceptance of a blocklist source that combines several sources I trust to make bad decisions"

And you were appointed an expert in this, when?

As a side note of some sort: it's interesting that you have your instance's /public/local/ locked down with a 422 "Requires an authorized user"

GottaLaff, to Wisconsin
@GottaLaff@mastodon.social avatar

👍🏻 announced Thursday that it will resume offering in next week after a judge ruled that an 1849 law that seemingly banned the procedure actually didn’t apply to abortions
https://apnews.com/article/b4410175ec2541cbdd984c395c81eb4c

FinchHaven,
@FinchHaven@hachyderm.io avatar

@GottaLaff

"an 1849 law that seemingly banned"

1849

"seemingly"

This is what we've come down to

GottaLaff, to Georgia
@GottaLaff@mastodon.social avatar
FinchHaven,
@FinchHaven@hachyderm.io avatar

@GottaLaff

Just love the semantic slight-of-hand here:

"Grubman says he has "serious questions" about independence of the grand jury"

"But "we don't know that," he continues."

"but we don't know that because you won't let us talk to them SO HA!!!"

FinchHaven,
@FinchHaven@hachyderm.io avatar

@GottaLaff

"The prosecution proceeds to present its PowerPoint...arguing against the motion to speak w/ grand jurors"

I mean, I'm really trying to remain silent, but...

At what point (if ever) does Judge Scott McAfee take a deep breath, look the defense right in the eye, and say

"Due to the persistent pattern of stochastic terrorism, deliberate harassment and threats leveled against any member of the prosecution at any level, you will not have access to the list of Grand Jurors. Period."

Green_Footballs, to random
@Green_Footballs@mastodon.social avatar

I don’t see how the Republican Party in its current form can ever come back from the very dark corner they’ve painted themselves into.

FinchHaven,
@FinchHaven@hachyderm.io avatar

@Green_Footballs

All I can think of is that really they're all waiting for the End Times they know is coming, and they're all going to rise up to Heaven and sit at the right hand of God

They're beyond burning bridges behind them

There's nothing for them to go back to

w7voa, to random
@w7voa@journa.host avatar

NBC press release: “This Sunday, Sept. 17 on NBC, the inaugural broadcast of Meet the Press with Kristen Welker will feature an exclusive interview with former President Donald Trump. The pretaped interview will take place Thursday in Bedminster, N.J. and will be Trump’s first broadcast network interview since leaving office.”

FinchHaven,
@FinchHaven@hachyderm.io avatar

@w7voa

Gee

Won’t be able to watch

Gotta stick red-hot knitting needles in my ear drums

Damn

Disappointed…

GottaLaff, to random
@GottaLaff@mastodon.social avatar

Via Kyle Griffin:

NBC News confirms: The FBI agent who oversaw the agency's investigation into disputed, in an interview with House committees, key portions of an IRS whistleblower's claim that the Justice Department gave preferential treatment to President Biden's son.

FinchHaven,
@FinchHaven@hachyderm.io avatar

@GottaLaff

This alleged "IRS whistleblower" has been as sketch as all hell, any time anything of credible substance has been published about [him/her/it]

Has any credible, authoritative source even seen this "whistleblower"?

FinchHaven,
@FinchHaven@hachyderm.io avatar

@GottaLaff

It really is, and I'm surprised (or maybe not) that it still gains as much traction as it does in the press

GottaLaff, to random
@GottaLaff@mastodon.social avatar

Via @emptywheel 1/…

Ever notice how age has replaced mental acuity & temperament?

Even on 's best days he spent most of the a.m. raging at Fox, which far more easily DQs him than age does for either him or Biden.

Now add in fact that Trump is far less healthy than

Nate Silver:

It's extremely sane for voters to ask whether man who wd be 86 at end of 2nd term shd be pres. It's a salient & newsworthy ques. The better argument is that media should also cover how Trump is old AF.

FinchHaven,
@FinchHaven@hachyderm.io avatar

@GottaLaff

This may become today's boilerplate:

"I'll just bring this over from Twitter, where I almost overused it:

Nate Silver should have stuck to baseball

Something he understood"

cc @emptywheel

ai6yr, to random

: "Kīlauea volcano is erupting. At approximately 3:15 a.m./p.m. HST on September 10, 2023, the USGS Hawaiian Volcano Observatory observed eruptive activity in Kīlauea summit webcam images and from field reports indicating that an eruption has commenced within Halemaʻumaʻu crater and on the down dropped block to the east in Kīlauea’s summit caldera, within Hawai‘i Volcanoes National Park." https://www.usgs.gov/volcanoes/kilauea/volcano-updates

FinchHaven,
@FinchHaven@hachyderm.io avatar

@ai6yr

Here's a good reference map:

June 14, 2023—Kīlauea summit eruption reference map

(By Kīlauea June 14, 2023)

https://www.usgs.gov/media/images/june-14-2023-kilauea-summit-eruption-reference-map

FinchHaven, to random
@FinchHaven@hachyderm.io avatar

And now for something completely different

The Kilauea volcano on the Big Island of Hawaii has just started to erupt again, starting barely a couple hours ago

"First lava came out at 15:14 HST/18:14 PDT Sunday (9/10) according to the webcam."

h/t @ingalls

https://www.youtube.com/live/tBh-ZhIB1Nk?si=pNN-9uxw6C7MWTIw

DenisCOVIDinfoguy, to auscovid19
@DenisCOVIDinfoguy@aus.social avatar

By Joaquín Beltrán @joaquinlife

"This has aged horribly and it’s only 5 hours old."

"A large proportion of us have hybrid immunity by now. We have been vaccinated, infected, and now have two forms of immunity. We have reason to think that hybrid immunity is more durable." –William Hanage (Harvard University)

@auscovid19

Twitter/X source: https://twitter.com/joaquinlife/status/1701018990477525262

FinchHaven,
@FinchHaven@hachyderm.io avatar

@DenisCOVIDinfoguy

So now we have "hybrid immunity"?

What was the first buzz-phrase, a couple years ago?

"Innate immunity"?

A concept with some epidemiological legitimacy, but which was captured by the Covid Is No Problem crowd as the reason no one had to worry about anything

We were already innately immune, so Why Worry?

@auscovid19

dangillmor, to random
@dangillmor@mastodon.social avatar

Funny-not-funny that the author of Musk's hagiography issues a correction (on the deadbird site, of course) for what Musk told him during the reporting for the book.

Also a reminder that the author withheld a huge story from the public for more than a year in order to have a scoop in his book.

FinchHaven,
@FinchHaven@hachyderm.io avatar

@mastodonmigration

Been reading about this from a bit of a distance, and not in any detail

One thing I don't get and no one has explicitly said:

Was Ukraine using Starlink for tactical comms, or actual weapons targeting acquisition and in-flight guidance?

Seems hard to believe that a retail satellite comms service was used for actual military tarteting

Or did I miss something?

cc @dangillmor

FinchHaven,
@FinchHaven@hachyderm.io avatar

@mastodonmigration

Thanks

Seems more and more like Just Another MusK Story(tm) in many ways

cc @dangillmor

Tekk, to mastodon
@Tekk@allthingstech.social avatar

Question for those who use ! For on the . Is that worth the $4?

FinchHaven,
@FinchHaven@hachyderm.io avatar

@Tekk

My personal opinion is 'yes'

I put toot! on my iPhone 14 about a week after getting started back November via web browser on my desktop, so it's been my first and only "app"

But I don't suffer from Chasing The Latest Shiny New App syndrome

Best feature: lets me follow other instances (think I have six right now) Local feeds, and if I want to boost or reply to anything toot! handles all the behind-the-scenes-bookkeeping for me without fuss because it knows who I really am

GottaLaff, to random
@GottaLaff@mastodon.social avatar

Via my pal Jason Karsh:

A Republican candidate for president explicitly calling for extrajudicial killings. The implication is it’s just gonna be brown people, but once you start summarily executing people, who’s to say where it stops, especially when this guy has so many perceived enemies.

Aaron Rupar:

A PAC is now using his "stone cold dead" line in an ad

FinchHaven,
@FinchHaven@hachyderm.io avatar

@GottaLaff

Formalising stochastic terrorism

Most recent campaign strategy

w7voa, to random
@w7voa@journa.host avatar

Paqui, the makers of the "One Chip Challenge," removing the spicy tortilla chip from store shelves after a 14-year-old died hours following taking the challenge. https://www.cbsnews.com/boston/news/paqui-one-chip-challenge-pulled-from-shelves-harris-wolobah-worcester-massachusetts/

FinchHaven,
@FinchHaven@hachyderm.io avatar

@w7voa

Really want to know how many versions of videos are currently up on right now

Featuring US high school teens, which -- let's face the reality here -- are not the world's most self-aware people

Anyone remember the billions of videos that hit Youtube?

What the hell did Paqui think was going to happen?

w7voa, to random
@w7voa@journa.host avatar

Does anyone know how I can report/shut down this imposter mastodon.social account spewing spam/potential phishing?

FinchHaven,
@FinchHaven@hachyderm.io avatar

@w7voa

I reported that account, both as "Spam" and "Other"

In both cases I had the option to flag specific posts that were at issue

I selected all of them

In both cases I also selected "Report this issue to @Mastodon dot Social, which I did

HTH...

Green_Footballs, to random
@Green_Footballs@mastodon.social avatar

Peter Navarro is one of the slimiest of the remoras swimming around the great white Donaldfish.

FinchHaven,
@FinchHaven@hachyderm.io avatar

@Green_Footballs

Remoras

AKA suckerfish

mhmm...

GottaLaff, to random
@GottaLaff@mastodon.social avatar

Finally.

Chris Hayes confirms it is pronounced CHEZbro. Not CHEESEbro.

Case closed.

FinchHaven,
@FinchHaven@hachyderm.io avatar

@GottaLaff

[switches on audio shifter]

"Cheese -- bro"

Got it

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • megavids
  • thenastyranch
  • magazineikmin
  • cubers
  • InstantRegret
  • cisconetworking
  • Youngstown
  • vwfavf
  • slotface
  • Durango
  • rosin
  • everett
  • kavyap
  • DreamBathrooms
  • provamag3
  • mdbf
  • khanakhh
  • modclub
  • tester
  • ethstaker
  • osvaldo12
  • GTA5RPClips
  • ngwrru68w68
  • Leos
  • anitta
  • tacticalgear
  • normalnudes
  • JUstTest
  • All magazines