livus,
livus avatar

I'm strongly against it because of Embrace Extend Extinguish.

I'd encourage everyone to read How To Kill A Decentralized Network like the Fediverse if you haven't already.

I think Meta's history reveals it to be a bad actor and I don't think their intentions here are above board.

CoffeeAddict,
CoffeeAddict avatar

Microsoft put that theory in practice with the release of Windows 2000 which offered support for the Kerberos security protocol. But that protocol was extended. The specifications of those extensions could be freely downloaded but required to accept a license which forbid you to implement those extensions. As soon as you clicked "OK", you could not work on any open source version of Kerberos. The goal was explicitly to kill any competing networking project such as Samba.

This is a great article describing exactly how Meta can control the fediverse and destroy smaller instances with anti-competitve practices.

CoffeeAddict,
CoffeeAddict avatar

My main concern is that this is just Facebook Meta utilizing the “Embrace, Extend, Extinguish” strategy that Microsoft used against Netscape in the 90s.

I feel like our small communities here - which are just getting started - are going to be flooded by Threads users who don’t even know what federation is and then all the content, power & control will realistically be in Meta’s hands.

My gut says that is probably Meta’s goal, but what do I know? I’m just some internet person.

livus,
livus avatar

I think you're right though.

CoffeeAddict, (edited )
CoffeeAddict avatar

Right!?

Decentralized networks are a threat to Meta’s entire business model which runs on advertisements. That doesn’t work very well when your users can just jump to another instance without ads.

Meta wants to nip the fediverse in the bud now before it’s too late for them to get a foothold. I think they’re gonna do it by (trying) to port their massive userbase to Threads, make other instances dependent on their content and users, and then pull the plug so they can go back to selling everyone’s information to advertisers.

Edit:
https://i.imgur.com/4U0g4Bk.png
I saw this image floating around a few days ago that I think helps illustrate that even if a fraction of Meta's userbase migrates to Threads it will be enough to dominate the fediverse. Instagram has two billion users, and the entire fediverse only has around 1.5 million.

FaceDeer,
FaceDeer avatar

Threads, despite its name, is not a threaded discussion forum like the Threadiverse. It's more like Mastodon, a microblogging protocol. I don't think we'll be seeing Threads users flooding here because the format of these communities isn't really compatible with that.

atocci,
atocci avatar

How would power be handed to Meta just because Threads has more users? The communities are under the control of the instances where they were created, and Threads users couldn't create larger communities to replace them either since it's only a microblogging platform.

CoffeeAddict,
CoffeeAddict avatar

The concept is that overtime, communities and connections will organically grow. If Threads has a disproportionally large ubserbase, then overtime they will create a similarly larger number of communities. This then would give them a lot more influence over the fediverse and anyone federated with them.

For smaller instances that become accustomed to seeing those communities and content, the danger is that Meta can just “pull the plug,” defederate, and extinguish the competition, or at the very least hurt their competitor's users experiences when interacting with content from Threads. The reason they might do this is purely because it fits into their business model which is selling user data to advertisers; it is in Meta’s interest to have as much data on their users as possible, and to have those users be based on Meta’s platform.

As I said in another comment, I could be totally wrong and this could benefit the fediverse. I just think the opposite is more likely because I do not trust Meta. I think they will play nice in the beginning, but then start to flex their muscles once they feel they’ve got enough influence.

Also, there is nothing stopping them from expanding Thread’s capabilities to include the threadiverse. Kbin has already demonstrated both are possible in one app.

atocci,
atocci avatar

If they pull the plug on ActivityPub and take their users back, things would just be exactly how they are now. Since they can't create communities or magazines like we can (and it's very unlikely Meta is going to try to implement this), if they want to participate in discussion here, they'll be posting in our communities. Kbin's magazines are uniquely suited to this as well because content gets sorted into them based on hashtags, so they wouldn't even need to know that they're posting to a magazine to do it.

We're already in a situation like you describe though with lemmy.world's near monopoly on large communities, which seems concerning to me as is.

CoffeeAddict,
CoffeeAddict avatar

I hope you’re right.

And I agree, lemmy.world does have a near-monopoly on large communities. I attribute that to lemmy being more developed and having apps ready and kbin simply not being completely ready in June (no shade thrown at ernest - he’s great and I like kbin better.) I hope overtime kbin grows some of its own large communities so it’s not so skewed towards a single instance.

atocci,
atocci avatar

Just to clarify what I mean, lemmy.world's position is bad for the threadiverse as a whole. It's where most of our users and largest communities we all post to are. If .world goes down, it'd be a major blow to our current, mostly stable, position and we'd be significantly worse off than if Meta were to come and go. Things are improving though and communities are slowly spreading to other instances! I also deeply appreciate that we have kbin as an alternative to Lemmy - thank you Ernest

Osa-Eris-Xero512,

No to preemptive defederation. They get defederated if they prove to be too problematic, same as any other instance.

kglitch,

Lol we know they're problematic already tho.

snooggums,
snooggums avatar

I would prefer not to federated with threads and will block if kbin federated. If I wanted Facebook content I would use Facebook.

Ganondorf,
Ganondorf avatar

How would you block threads? There are still many things about kbin that confuse me, so asking in earnest.

snooggums,
snooggums avatar

Kbin has settings to block entire instances. Unless threads is implemented as a ton of different instances it should be easy to just block threads.meta or whatever their instance is called.

I have a few instances like lemmy.ml on my block list already.

lanartri,
lanartri avatar

just wondering, why did you block lemmy.ml, what's the problem about it?

BeAware,
@BeAware@social.beaware.live avatar

@ThatOneKirbyMain2568 from someone on Mastodon, I don't see an issue with it.

The only data they get is public facing data (public profile info and post contents). The only place your IP or email address is stored, is on the server you're logged into or the site you're on.

Though others might have some other reservations, that was my biggest concern.

hellfire103,
@hellfire103@sopuli.xyz avatar

I’ll probably defed Threads itself, but there are a few accounts I want to follow.

jeena,
@jeena@jemmy.jeena.net avatar

I already preemptivelly defederated from them a long time ago.

FlihpFlorp,

Hey lemmy user here

Does kbin have user level defederation or something

bobs_monkey,

I don’t think full instance blocking is available yet, just users and specific communities

snooggums,
snooggums avatar

There is a setting to block a server, but it isn't fully functional as I still get some posts from those servers.

CoffeeAddict,
CoffeeAddict avatar

I am not super familiar with it, but my understanding is that Kbin lets users block something by domain.

So, my understanding is that yes individual users could theoretically block Threads content.

If I am wrong, somebody please correct me!

livus,
livus avatar

We have user level domain blocking, so if you block an instance it's a bit like defederation.

Afaik you can still sometimes see their users on other instances but you don't see any of the blocked instance's own content anywhere.

jeena,
@jeena@jemmy.jeena.net avatar

I don’t think so, only if you spin up your own instance. I myself have my own instance of Mastodon where I defederated Threads.

Fitik,

Yes it does, on kbin/mbin you can follow and block domains just like users

SamXavia,
@SamXavia@kbin.run avatar

I think it's a possible change, It will bring a lot of newer people that rather haven't researched or want to move away from 'main stream' platforms to be able to come to the Fediverse and could be really possible for the amount of people being able to interact in general across both platforms.

It would also allow me to move away from Threads and stick to one account for most of the Fediverse based Social Media usage, and I really hope other Social Media's follow in METAs steps.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • AskKbin
  • ngwrru68w68
  • rosin
  • GTA5RPClips
  • osvaldo12
  • love
  • Youngstown
  • slotface
  • khanakhh
  • everett
  • kavyap
  • mdbf
  • DreamBathrooms
  • thenastyranch
  • magazineikmin
  • anitta
  • InstantRegret
  • normalnudes
  • tacticalgear
  • cubers
  • ethstaker
  • modclub
  • cisconetworking
  • Durango
  • provamag3
  • tester
  • Leos
  • megavids
  • JUstTest
  • All magazines