In one nation, Palestinians could sue their own government for the destruction of their houses and their dead family members.
And they would have voting rights.
But as the land is holy, nobody should be allowed to own any. This must be public land and you need to pay to use it.
There are no prospects for real estate speculations in the future. Which will lead to a lot of problems in sustaining infrastructure. It will become a duty for the whole population. Until it will not be possible anymore.
Taking away land property could mitigate some of these processes.
No land property means a huge setback for the people, who profited from the oppression of the Palestinians.
Justice, equity and fairness can be managed with the price of the lease, people have to pay for their land.
But it could also lead to a lot of corruption.
Israel needs to pay, but the brave journalists in Gaza need to record and report the atrocities that are being committed by Israel,
The world's citizens need to know what is happening, or Israel will never be held to account.
Some interest groups are playing with Western antisemitism.
Because they hate our democracy and want to destroy it. They want the power, we gave to the institutions.
And they use us to do it. If we throw away our courts and overrule our judges, Western law will not exist anymore.
I do not want to have that.
I want to change our law to have a better future. But I do not want to destroy it.
A lot of people are going to stop those, who try to destroy it nonetheless.
PALESTINIANS ARE also #SEMITIC PEOPLE.
The genocide being committed against Gaza civilians is #ANTI-SEMITIC
People protesting against this Genocide are being #PRO-SEMITIC
Zionists DO NOT have a monopoly on Semitism
Zionists DO NOT have the right to defy international humanitarian laws and commit whatever atrocities they choose.
Most of the "people" screaming #antisemitism against the protestors are israeli bots & puppets.
@AdeptVeritatis
I am aware of that page - it is referenced from the ones I cited, after all. I did not cite them by accident.
[Added] It remains that the hyphenated vs non-hyphenated definitions seem specific to the ADL, which is by no means the ultimate authority on the terms.
Add comment