remixtures, Portuguese
@remixtures@tldr.nettime.org avatar

: "The recent emergence of generative AI software as viable tools for use in the cultural and creative industries has sparked debates about the potential for “creativity” to be automated and “augmented” by algorithmic machines. Such discussions, however, begin from an ontological position, attempting to define creativity by either falling prey to universalism (i.e. “creativity is X”) or reductionism (i.e. “only humans can be truly creative” or “human creativity will be fully replaced by creative machines”). Furthermore, such an approach evades addressing the real and material impacts of AI on creative labour in these industries. This article thus offers more expansive methodological and conceptual approaches to the recent hype on generative AI. By combining (Csikszentmihalyi, The systems model of creativity, Springer, Dordrecht, 2014) systems view of creativity, in which we emphasise the shift from “what” to “where” is creativity, with (Lievrouw, Media technologies, The MIT Press, 2014) relational-materialist theory of “mediation”, we argue that the study of “creativity” in the context of generative AI must be attentive to the interactions between technologies, practices, and social arrangements. When exploring the relational space between these elements, three core concepts become pertinent: creative labour, automation, and distributed agency. Critiquing “creativity” through these conceptual lenses allows us to re-situate the use of generative AI within discourses of labour in post-industrial capitalism and brings us to a conceptualisation of creativity that privileges neither the human user nor machine algorithm but instead emphasises a relational and distributed form of agency." https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00146-024-01921-3

TEG,
@TEG@mastodon.online avatar

@remixtures That looks interesting, thanks - one question (I did very quickly scan to see if you addressed what I'm wondering in the paper), why the "falling prey to" type of terminology towards universalism?

remixtures,
@remixtures@tldr.nettime.org avatar

@TEG Sorry, I need to get a better look at the paper. On principle, I would say that universalism is always my preferred lens towards all social issues.

TEG,
@TEG@mastodon.online avatar

@remixtures Ahaha, sorry, I fully assumed you were an author :D Curious what you think of it then when you've had a chance to look - it read to me as quite a negative framing, while I'd also tend to "naturally" look for what they seem to be calling universalist points of view, just for understanding. It seems like it could be more complementary.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • ai
  • ngwrru68w68
  • DreamBathrooms
  • khanakhh
  • magazineikmin
  • InstantRegret
  • ethstaker
  • thenastyranch
  • Youngstown
  • rosin
  • slotface
  • osvaldo12
  • everett
  • kavyap
  • Durango
  • megavids
  • cubers
  • tester
  • GTA5RPClips
  • modclub
  • mdbf
  • cisconetworking
  • tacticalgear
  • Leos
  • normalnudes
  • anitta
  • provamag3
  • JUstTest
  • lostlight
  • All magazines