Imagine an AI haiku writing program and a master haiku artist.
The artist works with meaning and intent. Some things are popular, some not, but everything was chosen to communicate something.
The AI is matching words that frequently go together, has no concept of meaning, and spews high speed gibberish. BUT, the people who vote up or down on results are selecting works that seem like they could be 'deep'.
Given the top 5 from both, could you tell the difference?
Add comment