Nonilex,
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

May Owe $100 Million From Tax Breaks, Audit Shows

A previously unknown focus of an audit is a dubious accounting maneuver that effectively meant taking the same write-offs twice on his skyscraper.


https://www.nytimes.com/2024/05/11/us/trump-taxes-audit-chicago.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare&sgrp=c-cb

Nonilex,
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

The 92-story, glass-sheathed skyscraper along the River is the tallest &, at least for now, the last major construction project by . Through a combination of cost overruns & the bad luck of opening in the teeth of the Great Recession, it was also a vast money .

But when Trump sought to reap benefits from his losses, the has argued, he went too far & in effect wrote off the same losses twice.

Nonilex,
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

The first write-off came on Trump’s #tax return for 2008. With sales lagging far behind projections, he claimed that his investment in the condo-hotel tower met the tax code definition of “worthless,” because his #debt on the project meant he would never see a profit. That move resulted in #Trump reporting losses as high as $651 million for the year, The Times & ProPublica found.

#law #fraud
https://www.propublica.org/article/trump-irs-audit-chicago-hotel-taxes

Nonilex,
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

There is no indication the challenged the initial claim,…that lack of scrutiny surprised experts…. But in 2010, & his tax advisers sought to extract further benefits from the proj, executing a maneuver that would draw yrs of inquiry from the IRS. First, he shifted the company that owned the tower into a new partnership.…like moving coins from one pocket to another. Then he used the shift as justification to declare $168M in additional losses over the next decade.

Nonilex,
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

…reporting by NYT & ProPublica about the tower reveals a 2nd component of Trump’s quarrel w/the . This account was pieced together from a collection of public docs, including filings from the NYAG’s suit against in 2022, a passing reference to the audit in a congressional rpt that same yr & an obscure 2019 IRS memo that explored the legitimacy of the accounting maneuver. The memo did not identify Trump, but the docs, along w/tax records…indicated Trump was the focus.

Nonilex,
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

…The outcome of ’s dispute could set a precedent for people seeking benefits from the laws governing partnerships. Those are notoriously complex, riddled with uncertainty & under constant assault by lawyers pushing boundaries for their clients. The has inadvertently further invited aggressive positions by rarely auditing partnership tax returns.

Nonilex,
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

Beyond the 2 episodes under audit, reporting by The NYTimes in recent years has found that, across his business career, has often used what experts described as highly aggressive — & at times, legally suspect — accounting maneuvers to avoid paying . To the 6 experts consulted for this article, Trump’s accounting maneuvers appeared to be questionable & unlikely to withstand scrutiny.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • chicago
  • kavyap
  • thenastyranch
  • cubers
  • ethstaker
  • InstantRegret
  • DreamBathrooms
  • ngwrru68w68
  • magazineikmin
  • everett
  • Youngstown
  • mdbf
  • slotface
  • rosin
  • GTA5RPClips
  • JUstTest
  • khanakhh
  • normalnudes
  • osvaldo12
  • cisconetworking
  • provamag3
  • Durango
  • tacticalgear
  • modclub
  • Leos
  • megavids
  • tester
  • anitta
  • lostlight
  • All magazines