kkarhan,
@kkarhan@mstdn.social avatar

Everyone who defends or apoligizes deserves to get blocked on sight.

If you think it's a "hill worth dying on" then get your facts straight:

KiwiFarms is literally the acid-filled openpit mine of hate and solely being used by people who get banned from 4chan, 8kun, MumsNet and other shitsites.

They are indefensible and irredeemable and with a real bodycount.

The one thing KFs deserve is to conditionlessly surrender!

lewdthewides,
@lewdthewides@hidamari.apartments avatar

@kkarhan As someone who Josh tried to start shit with on his podcast, I reject his slippery slope argument and will proceed to not care about what happens to him and his ilk

Gon0s,
@Gon0s@mamot.fr avatar

@kkarhan @kkarhan
You should have some rest. And calm down to understand what EFF is asking for.

But obviously, you are in berserk mode and confused, so asking kill everything, even what is permitting you your own free speech for cleaning up a problem (really big one, eff and many and I agree) that should never be mitigated at that level.

Do you realize that mastodon could be nuked the same way with that "super way" to shutdown kiwifarm ?

kkarhan,
@kkarhan@mstdn.social avatar

@Gon0s I am calm, because you'd knew if I wasn't.

Your reply is clearly in bad faith and I'm not gonna waste my time beyond telling you to get a life and not defend hategroomers, stochstic terrorism and a stie hosting CSAM that all apply to KiwiFarms.

https://xkcd.com/1357/

If you want to defend a site with a literal bodycount, you are part of the problem!

Also the comparison doesn't work as :activitypub: is decentralized.

kkarhan,
@kkarhan@mstdn.social avatar

Seriously, don't take my word for it.

Ask people like Liz Fong-Jones.

Fair warning: This video is age-restricted for good reasons!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Np9erdnM4l8

kkarhan,
@kkarhan@mstdn.social avatar

And yes, if you provide forums like with or protection, you are part of the problem when you act like 's and refuse to react upon complaints.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kYkFYmqJYvE

kkarhan,
@kkarhan@mstdn.social avatar

All does is act in self-defense against a hostile network.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i4n6zmajfsM

And OFC they must have the right to refuse to provide services like transit.

That's common practice and it's called [ ] and it's the reason the can't the entire internet with their which is weaponization of [ infrastructure]...

kkarhan,
@kkarhan@mstdn.social avatar

OFC everyone who facilitates services for is equally guilty and should also be blocked - regardless if registrars, hosters, colocators or transit providers.

B_Whitewind,
@B_Whitewind@regenerate.social avatar

@kkarhan I am still like 99% free speech but that kind of place is the 1% that won't be missed.

kkarhan,
@kkarhan@mstdn.social avatar

@B_Whitewind Even if we believe in "absolute free speech" that doesn't mean we believe free speech should have freedom of consequences.

It's very simple, because and keep shit together.

Nothing would prevent me from denying historical facts but I've to also accept the foreseeable consequences.

Regardless if legally, economically or socially.

Cuz if people don't do things that are bad because they are bad, then consequences are necessary.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • •
  • random
  • kavyap
  • InstantRegret
  • ethstaker
  • DreamBathrooms
  • mdbf
  • magazineikmin
  • thenastyranch
  • Youngstown
  • tacticalgear
  • slotface
  • Durango
  • khanakhh
  • rosin
  • everett
  • Leos
  • vwfavf
  • normalnudes
  • osvaldo12
  • cubers
  • GTA5RPClips
  • cisconetworking
  • ngwrru68w68
  • anitta
  • provamag3
  • tester
  • modclub
  • megavids
  • JUstTest
  • All magazines
    •