maris, to random
@maris@chaos.social avatar

Welcome to No-NAT-November.
all you NAT rules are now gone.
consider routing instead :)

kkarhan,
@kkarhan@mstdn.social avatar

@sten @Error @maris I mean, is trash but for some abdurd reason my ISP gladly provides me a /29 of IPv4's yet won't offer ma a songle /64 of IPv6's

And due to bs. like 's is not an option even if I choose a local server...

kkarhan, to random
@kkarhan@mstdn.social avatar

Everyone who defends or apoligizes deserves to get blocked on sight.

If you think it's a "hill worth dying on" then get your facts straight:

KiwiFarms is literally the acid-filled openpit mine of hate and solely being used by people who get banned from 4chan, 8kun, MumsNet and other shitsites.

They are indefensible and irredeemable and with a real bodycount.

The one thing KFs deserve is to conditionlessly surrender!

kkarhan,
@kkarhan@mstdn.social avatar

All does is act in self-defense against a hostile network.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i4n6zmajfsM

And OFC they must have the right to refuse to provide services like transit.

That's common practice and it's called [ ] and it's the reason the can't the entire internet with their which is weaponization of [ infrastructure]...

kkarhan, to random
@kkarhan@mstdn.social avatar

Apparently the has chosen an open pit mine for hate as their "hill to die on"...
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2023/08/isps-should-not-police-online-speech-no-matter-how-awful-it

Because there is no valid reason to ever defend and has the right to [) traffic to them for all the valid reasons...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kiwi_Farms

kkarhan,
@kkarhan@mstdn.social avatar

@olives @KelsonV @eff you don't get it, do you?

  1. isn'a a Tier-1 and even if they were, there is no legal mandate for them to accept anything or provide services to anyone.
    Espechally since there's no legally enforceable :loading: nor are they regulated as a "utility service" with "must provide" clauses.

  2. Providers are already very twitchy and they'll block entire ASNs if they get listed by .

  3. is indefensible thus invalid discussion.

fell, to ipv6
@fell@ma.fellr.net avatar

Thanks to the free tunnel service (and a bit if inspiration by @lamp). I could finally enable IPv6 for my server. Yay.

stefano, to ipv6
@stefano@bsd.cafe avatar

With the recent increases in address costs, IPv6 has become even more important. Even a small and affordable VPS is now almost always delivered with at least a /64, providing the opportunity to directly connect various services (or jails, containers, etc.) with their own address. In my opinion, IPv6 is inclusive.

We need more IPv6, and people should finally decide to delve into it. Once the mechanisms are understood, it's no more complex than IPv4, except for memorizing addresses, of course.

zirias,
@zirias@techhub.social avatar

@stefano Adoption of isn't a widespread problem any more... (there are some dinosaur -only networks, but they're slowly dying...)

But: I'm not fine with what I get from an as a private consumer. I want the option to have a fixed prefix, I want to be able to get delegation for that prefix.

That's why I currently ignore what my ISP gives me and instead use 's for my IPv6 connectivity. It's free and offers the features I want 🙄

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • provamag3
  • rosin
  • thenastyranch
  • Durango
  • DreamBathrooms
  • ngwrru68w68
  • magazineikmin
  • cubers
  • Youngstown
  • mdbf
  • slotface
  • osvaldo12
  • GTA5RPClips
  • kavyap
  • megavids
  • InstantRegret
  • everett
  • tacticalgear
  • vwfavf
  • tester
  • normalnudes
  • modclub
  • ethstaker
  • khanakhh
  • cisconetworking
  • anitta
  • Leos
  • JUstTest
  • All magazines