whitequark,
@whitequark@mastodon.social avatar

girl who interprets "the Intel architecture" to refer to iAPX 432

foone,
@foone@digipres.club avatar

@whitequark there's only one "Intel Architecture" and it's 8051!

indigoparadox,
@indigoparadox@mastodon.social avatar

@foone I only saw this reply and my first immediate thought was "Intel architecture? You mean the iAPX?" Then I saw the originall post by @whitequark and it was like, right? We're talking about normal people, here. Desktop architectures are what normal people are focused on. This is normal.

whitequark,
@whitequark@mastodon.social avatar
brouhaha,
@brouhaha@mastodon.social avatar

@whitequark Same except guy. Still slowly working toward actually running a 442 GDP.
Also the i960XA, Intel's RISC-based capability architecture. Generally the same object types and operators, but a better memory model. Sadly they failed to sell the XA except to the US military.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • kavyap
  • thenastyranch
  • GTA5RPClips
  • tester
  • InstantRegret
  • DreamBathrooms
  • ngwrru68w68
  • magazineikmin
  • everett
  • Youngstown
  • mdbf
  • slotface
  • rosin
  • cisconetworking
  • megavids
  • khanakhh
  • normalnudes
  • osvaldo12
  • cubers
  • tacticalgear
  • Durango
  • ethstaker
  • modclub
  • anitta
  • provamag3
  • Leos
  • JUstTest
  • lostlight
  • All magazines