dr2chase, 15 days ago @futurebird Isn't it (technically) an "interface", not a "class"? Not helping with the annoying, but the reason it feels underspecified is that it wants to allow very simple things to be sets, and so the requirements are as loose as possible.
@futurebird Isn't it (technically) an "interface", not a "class"? Not helping with the annoying, but the reason it feels underspecified is that it wants to allow very simple things to be sets, and so the requirements are as loose as possible.