silsinn9821,

user with dotted username (an impossibility in vanilla ) spotted in the wild federating with a instance (namely, Voskey)! So, does this mean Misskey can handle dotted usernames & thus can further do what ?

JsonCulverhouse,
@JsonCulverhouse@flipboard.social avatar

@silsinn9821 @kashi.usuiro It kind of seems like i can mention them from my mastodon instance

JsonCulverhouse,
@JsonCulverhouse@flipboard.social avatar

@silsinn9821 @kashi.usuiro

The activitypub generated has a proper mention in the tag.

{  
"type": "Mention",  
"href": "<https://threads.net/ap/users/17841461281678268/>",  
"name": "@kashi.usuiro"  
}  
silsinn9821,

@JsonCulverhouse Except on my end, you ended up pinging a non-existent user from your own local instance (followed by the dot, the usuiro, & the Threads domain name):
@kashi

JsonCulverhouse,
@JsonCulverhouse@flipboard.social avatar

@silsinn9821
I think that misskey must be broken... (also your mention generated a link back to your site in a strange way...)

you can see that the federated activity pub message is correct.

I've seen this quite a bit with threads mentions. Joining the the h-card in the html and the Mention from the tags is non trivial.

https://flipboard.social/@JsonCulverhouse/112220494684529008.json

silsinn9821,

By the way, that account belongs to a small Japanese shop selling online, in case anyone here wishes to buy from them:
@kashi.usuiro@threads.net
(Sadly, it seems you cannot yet directly @ them from as the dot immediately breaks the ping for being outside the instance-domain-name part, so I had to fake the ping here by making it a to their URL.)

silsinn9821,

So, this (the dotted usernames that can federate with other instances but can't yet be @ pinged from such instances) is a clear example of being exercised by upon the .
@youronlyone Your thoughts on this again, as we previously discussed it on ?

youronlyone,

@silsinn9821

Oh, and:

but can't yet be @ pinged from such instances) is a clear example of #EEE being exercised by #Threads upon the #Fediverse

Is, well, not a fair example because dotted usernames have been in used years before Threads and the Twitter Migration. As I mentioned, site plugins have been using @-domain.tld@domain.tld format.

If dotted usernames are going to be used to build a case of EEE by Meta, then the same argument can be used to accuse all other “plugins” using the same format, like Automattic's AP plugin and Brid.gy fed. ^_~

To clarify, I'm not defending Threads. I just find the issue of dotted usernames being linked to EEE, to build a case against Threads, as inaccurate. ^_^

Ciantic,
@Ciantic@twit.social avatar

@youronlyone @silsinn9821 You are correct. Even *@example.com is valid.

"The userpart consists only of Unicode code points that conform to the PRECIS IdentifierClass specified in [RFC7564]."

"Code points in the range U+0021 through U+007E, i.e., the (printable) ASCII7 ("K") category defined under Section 9.11. These code points are "grandfathered" into PRECIS and thus are valid even if they would otherwise be disallowed according to the property-based rules specified in the next section."

BeAware,
@BeAware@social.beaware.live avatar

@youronlyone @silsinn9821 ....my Threads account has a . In it and I never had issues tagging it from Mastodon....🤷‍♂️

youronlyone,
@youronlyone@c.im avatar

@BeAware

Yep. It looks like a , and forks, issue.

I can't test it from a site though (I just found out today the Pleroma site I had an account, closed down).

@youronlyone @silsinn9821

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • threads
  • DreamBathrooms
  • magazineikmin
  • Durango
  • thenastyranch
  • Youngstown
  • slotface
  • hgfsjryuu7
  • osvaldo12
  • rosin
  • kavyap
  • mdbf
  • PowerRangers
  • everett
  • khanakhh
  • anitta
  • InstantRegret
  • tacticalgear
  • vwfavf
  • ethstaker
  • ngwrru68w68
  • normalnudes
  • tester
  • GTA5RPClips
  • cubers
  • cisconetworking
  • Leos
  • modclub
  • provamag3
  • All magazines