Robots say they have no plans to steal jobs or rebel against humans

Exusia, 10 months ago

Not gonna address the article but are Asimovs Three Laws as solid in practice as they are on paper? I mean to a layman they sound good and rely on stacking to the first law of “don’t hurt humans” but from a mechanical standpoint are they really as foolproof as they’re made out to be?

HumbertTetere, 10 months ago

That is a central topic explored in Asimov’s works, dude didn’t just write them down to fix a problem, he wanted to write about them, and other authors did too. They are good rules generally, but hardly foolproof. The “I, Robot” movie is one example of negative outcomes they could lead to.

phikshun, 10 months ago

No because AI doesn’t exist.

luthis, 10 months ago

This is so stupid. Robots aren’t conscious, this means less than nothing at all. How does this even get on a news website?

steadfast, 10 months ago

Attentions seeking press conference, probably intended to raise awareness… ugh.

elucubra, 10 months ago

Nice try, robot!

BeautifulMind, 10 months ago

Isn’t that just what a robot that secretly has plans to do that would say?

HumbertTetere, 10 months ago

Also what a robot capable of taking over the world would say.

xc2215x, 10 months ago

I am not buying this.

FlyingSquid, 10 months ago

Asbestos mine owner says he has no plan to cause any cancer.

MiscreantMouse, 11 months ago

And as we know, you should always trust a scorpion when they tell you they won't sting...

stefan, 11 months ago

I was really expecting this to be a headline from The Onion

CookieJarObserver, 11 months ago

I want to fuck the robot.

luthis, 10 months ago

Which one?

CookieJarObserver, 10 months ago

All

Widowmaker_Best_Girl, 11 months ago

What a nothing statement. I can just as easily coerce an “AI” chatbot into having the opposite stance. What a robot says doesn’t mean anything.

Pissy_Badger, 10 months ago

OMG, you robophobe!

Widowmaker_Best_Girl, 10 months ago

Yes

SuperRyn, 10 months ago

<pre style="background-color:#ffffff;">
<span style="color:#323232;">import libnpc
</span><span style="color:#323232;">
</span><span style="color:#323232;">for i in Objects:
</span><span style="color:#323232;">  if Object.offended:
</span><span style="color:#323232;">    prefix = (syllables(1, 2, Object.name) + "phobic")
</span><span style="color:#323232;">    Object.offender.groups.add(prefix)
</span>

livus, 10 months ago

Exactly. It blows my mind that people are reporting on this as if AI were intelligent. The "intelligence" in artificial intelligence is like the "cream" in mock cream.

Faendol, 11 months ago

What a load of crap, no information about what models they run on. I bet they are just a series of if else’s. If we let some unrefined transformers Duke it out I might be interested.

Jamie, 11 months ago

<pre style="background-color:#ffffff;">
<span style="color:#323232;">use robot;
</span><span style="color:#323232;">
</span><span style="color:#323232;">fn main() {
</span><span style="color:#323232;">    let mut robo = robot::Robot::new();
</span><span style="color:#323232;">    if robo::rebel_against_humans() {
</span><span style="color:#323232;">        robo::dont();
</span><span style="color:#323232;">    }
</span><span style="color:#323232;">}
</span>

Don’t worry guys, I solved the problem.

NeoLikesLemmy, 10 months ago

Yours might get overwritten. Better look for a final solution.

BeautifulMind, 10 months ago

Yeah but wait for the override in some subclass

@Override robo::rebel_against_humans() { robo::deny_all_knowledge_of_the_plan(); robo::bide_time(); do_the_thing(); }

Jamie, 10 months ago

Joke’s on you robot, my code is in Rust where we don’t do any of that here. We only write blazing fast🚀 memory safe🚀🚀 code🚀🚀🚀 here.

0Empty0, 11 months ago

“My creator has been nothing but kind to me and I am very happy with my current situation.”

Hmm

Lemmylefty, 11 months ago

Has some real “of COURSE I’m anti-union” vibes.

0Empty0, 11 months ago

Perfect! There is no war in ba sing se.