I feel there has to be a way of training neural networks to recognise the influence of their training data on the output.
This would probably include training a complementary indexing network + database that would then ”reverse-training” resolve and offer at some predetermined accuracy the #copyright-viable sources for each generated #aiart
I need some help though. A proof would show the companies know it can be done, but they just don’t want to.
@sofia No, actually I am looking forward to people making MORE contributions to AI training instead of hiding their work away to protect it from being stolen.
I am not looking for copyright violations, but a new paradigm, where generative models feed back into the creative economy.
For this rewriting of the copyright laws will be necessary. I wrote lengthily about this for the Finnish Pirate party more than a year ago:
As to my motivation, looking forward to people making MORE contributions to AI training instead of hiding their work away to protect it from being stolen.
I am not looking for copyright violations, but a new paradigm, where generative models feed back into the creative economy.
For this rewriting of the copyright laws will be necessary. I wrote lengthily about this for the Finnish Pirate party more than a year ago:
In other words: Getting paid a reasonable amount from the model providers would incentivise people to be part of the training data.
Getting also paid from using the models creatively incentivises their use, and this is where copyright reform is most needed.
Instead of remaining a grey area forever, as the industry would sure be happy about, we need legal category for the remix as legit piece of art, not bastardisation.
I wonder if the whole #AI thing will finally convince artists that modern #copyright regime was never meant to protect them.
It was meant to protect the middlemen. The Amazons, the Spotifies, the Sonys, the Disneys. The film studios, the publishing houses.
Now the middlemen figured out they own basically all of art, and that they can just train a computer on that, to replace artists with a piece of software.
And then stop paying artists even the pittance they were being paid so far.
@rysiek
My worry is that the common person creator cannot get results from Congress which would favor the creators, and that the big corporations will set the rules-- in their favor, of course.
I don't know of any system that could be put in place which would both protect from Big Data scraping and over-profitting, while also allowing creators to make a living in an era of #AI.
I guess I just don't hold out much hope that any actual changes would not simply make things worse.😞