@MisuseCase@twit.social
@MisuseCase@twit.social avatar

MisuseCase

@MisuseCase@twit.social

#infosec and #cybersecurity professional who preaches about stakeholder engagement and #usability. #poverty abolitionist. Does #knitting, loves #kdramas.

My political views do not reflect those of my employer, who I will not disclose.

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

MisuseCase, to random
@MisuseCase@twit.social avatar

Just said something on my synagogue listserve to the effect that Israel has hijacked the term “antisemitism” to advance its own interests and silence critics, often at the expense of American Jews, so effectively that Israel gets more support and consideration from much of our political class than we, actual people who live in America, do.

LOL we will see how people respond.

theluddite, to random
@theluddite@assemblag.es avatar

The point of solar panels is not to ensure "solar profitability," but to make for a greener, better world. Its profitability is only justified insofar as it moves us towards that goal. If we want to switch to renewables, then sometimes we're going to have surplus, because of how renewables work. This is well known and discussed ad nauseam. If that makes power markets unstable, then the problem is with markets, not with there being too many solar panels.

MisuseCase,
@MisuseCase@twit.social avatar

@theluddite You can say that about solar panels, but as long as the organizations that build, own, and operate them are for-profit companies, profit is going to be top of mind.

It doesn’t matter if the generator is powered by solar or wind or coal or what: if it’s owned by a private company, that’s how it’s going to be. (Which is why utilities should be nationalized/in the public sector.)

/1

MisuseCase,
@MisuseCase@twit.social avatar

@theluddite The idea that solar panels are somehow free of all the issues and perverse incentives associated with capitalism, or that they should be even if they are some company’s private property, is something popularized by capitalist marketing.

Unless they are nationalized, solar panels are an instrument of profit and subject to the whims of their profit-oriented owners too.

/2

MisuseCase,
@MisuseCase@twit.social avatar

@theluddite Also, on a related note, “too much electricity on the grid” is a real mechanical/engineering problem that can break things. It’s why we need more storage and transmission to both ensure grid resiliency and to make full use of abundant renewable energy when stuff like this happens.

/end

MisuseCase,
@MisuseCase@twit.social avatar

@CedarTea @theluddite Making clean fuels would be good, or doing water desalinization or something. (The latter might require uninterrupted power, I’m not sure: I know water treatment and sewage treatment do.)

I’m also in favor of putting more nuclear on the grid to manage baseload demand. Nuclear has a smaller material/physical/ecological footprint than renewables and solar - but may not be appropriate for all situations.

1/2

MisuseCase,
@MisuseCase@twit.social avatar

@billiglarper @CedarTea @theluddite “Baseload” means the electricity you need to generate to meet demand at its absolute lowest. You may need more than that at times (like peak times), but never less. Something that generates constantly and predictably is perfect for that.

“Baseload thinking doesn’t work anymore” well, the problem with that is baseload still exists.

/1

MisuseCase,
@MisuseCase@twit.social avatar

@billiglarper @CedarTea @theluddite “Nuclear is expensive as it runs at 95% capacity” well, the cost of nuclear and its capacity have nothing to do with each other. It’s also not true that nuclear’s more expensive than equivalent solar generation.

https://yt.artemislena.eu/watch?v=y_J1gSeWomA&ab_channel=NuclearforAustralia

And while older light-water reactors can’t ramp up or down, newer designs can.

/end

MisuseCase,
@MisuseCase@twit.social avatar

@CedarTea @billiglarper @theluddite Another problem with “unsubsidized” is that solar got a lot of subsidies to get where it is and still does to a greater or lesser extent, depending on the region/state/country.

If solar can be subsidized, why not nuclear?

MisuseCase,
@MisuseCase@twit.social avatar

@CedarTea @marwe @billiglarper @theluddite In addition, every form of energy generation (including solar) produces waste, which may or may not include radioactive material but definitely includes some material that will be dangerous for much longer than the half-life of anything radioactive.

So when discussing the danger of waste from nuclear and the cost of managing it, it’s useful to ask, compared to what?

/1

MisuseCase,
@MisuseCase@twit.social avatar

@CedarTea @marwe @billiglarper @theluddite Should we not manage and securely dispose of spent fuel, externalizing the cost to the environment and human health? That’s what coal and gas generation do. And some of the waste they put into the water and air is radioactive!

Obviously, this is not acceptable.

/2

MisuseCase,
@MisuseCase@twit.social avatar

@CedarTea @marwe @billiglarper @theluddite What about solar? That actually creates waste too. Mining rare earths for solar panels is actually a nasty business.

For solar panels that have reached the end of their useful lifetimes, some materials can (and should) be recycled. Other materials can’t be, and must be safely disposed of.

/3

MisuseCase,
@MisuseCase@twit.social avatar

@CedarTea @marwe @billiglarper @theluddite Both recyclable and non-recyclable material left over from solar panels include very toxic material.

(Waste from rare earth mining includes radioactive material.)

And properly dealing with all the waste generated by the lifecycle of solar panels is costly…in no small part because there’s so much of it.

/4

MisuseCase,
@MisuseCase@twit.social avatar

@CedarTea @marwe @billiglarper @theluddite Whether you are talking about solar or nuclear, there’s waste material that needs to be sequestered safely for centuries or maybe millennia.

Or sometimes longer. There’s a lot of non-radioactive stuff that’s toxic forever, like arsenic.

/5

MisuseCase,
@MisuseCase@twit.social avatar

@CedarTea @marwe @billiglarper @theluddite We manage long-term disposal of stuff like arsenic from industrial processes all the time though. Just sequester it and bury it in a vault below the water table. Which is the proper way to sequester spent nuclear fuel. If the spent fuel is reprocessed then what’s left over only needs to be sequestered for ~300 years.

/end

MisuseCase,
@MisuseCase@twit.social avatar

@ArneBab @CedarTea @billiglarper @theluddite Solar got (and still receives) plenty of subsidies. I don’t know why people are hung up on the subsidies thing when every form of generation gets them.

MisuseCase, to random
@MisuseCase@twit.social avatar

That popular leftist account with a Picrew avatar of a red-headed woman is saying egregiously incorrect things for likes and retoots again.

This time it’s “Joe Biden obviously has no plans to tax the rich” when his proposed presidential budget included raising taxes on the very rich, and more significantly, the IRS is aggressively going after rich tax cheats more aggressively than they have since…well, since I can remember.

StillIRise1963, to random
@StillIRise1963@mastodon.world avatar

I’d just like to point out that are about 8,300,000 people in NYC.

HUNDREDS 🤣

https://www.nydailynews.com/2024/05/23/hundreds-of-trump-supporters-pack-bronx-rally-as-counter-protesters-jeer-outside/

MisuseCase,
@MisuseCase@twit.social avatar

@StillIRise1963 And a lot of those folks probably aren’t from NYC. Or they’re from Staten Island, same diff

MisuseCase, to random
@MisuseCase@twit.social avatar

There’s a lot of “the outcome of X is predetermined because lots of other people are doing/will do Y so it doesn’t matter if I do Z” going on, so people can justify shirking their responsibilities to each other.

This is about electoral stuff but also things like even minimal COVID mitigation and combatting climate change.

MisuseCase, to random
@MisuseCase@twit.social avatar

Well, yes and no. It wasn’t the House that the John Lewis VRA got stuck in, but the Senate, because Manchin and Sinema (mostly Manchin) preferred to keep the filibuster in place as a CYA measure. https://mastodon.social/@davidbrin/112491210974906425

GottaLaff, to random
@GottaLaff@mastodon.social avatar

Today I read one report that RFKJr has 17% of the vote nationally.

Then I saw this from Cook. So you'll forgive me if, despite knowing how meaningless polls are, I get nervous:

https://www.cookpolitical.com/survey-research/2024-swing-state-project/unique-election-driven-traditional-issue

MisuseCase,
@MisuseCase@twit.social avatar

@SailorDisco @TCatInReality @GottaLaff At a certain point this is deferring responsibility for the thing you are going to do (not vote, vote 3rd party) and its potential consequences. It’s basically a thought-terminating cliche to use against the notion that you might be obligated to do even the tiniest bit of harm reduction for your neighbors.

MisuseCase,
@MisuseCase@twit.social avatar

@TCatInReality @SailorDisco @GottaLaff I will say that a lot of voters are miseducated, on purpose, by their schools or the news or political ads. That’s not their fault.

But if you are someone actually paying attention - and most people on here are - then saying you won’t participate and making excuses for actions that you KNOW will have a bad outcome is on you, not someone else miseducating you.

BigAngBlack, to random
@BigAngBlack@fosstodon.org avatar

https://www.theguardian.com/world/article/2024/may/23/free-church-of-scotland-under-fire-for-failure-to-apologise-over-slavery-money

MisuseCase,
@MisuseCase@twit.social avatar

@BigAngBlack There was a whole thing about this in the 1840s when Frederick Douglass toured Scotland and spoke in churches - he would get people chanting “Send back the money!”

GossiTheDog, to random
@GossiTheDog@cyberplace.social avatar

For those who aren’t aware, Microsoft have decided to bake essentially an infostealer into base Windows OS and enable by default.

From the Microsoft FAQ: “Note that Recall does not perform content moderation. It will not hide information such as passwords or financial account numbers."

Info is stored locally - but rather than something like Redline stealing your local browser password vault, now they can just steal the last 3 months of everything you’ve typed and viewed in one database.

video/mp4

MisuseCase,
@MisuseCase@twit.social avatar

@GossiTheDog @Laird_Dave So this is definitely geared towards not just middle-aged dudes but managers.

Like, can these people not just organize their emails into folders by topic? Microsoft could have re-worked the Outlook rules function to make this easier instead of whatever this is.

MisuseCase,
@MisuseCase@twit.social avatar

@Laird_Dave If @GossiTheDog is correct about who drove the decision to create Recall and why (and IMO it’s very plausible), then it means business leaders don’t talk to their legal departments, CISOs, records managers, or any of the other roles in their organizations that could have told them why this was bad.

MisuseCase,
@MisuseCase@twit.social avatar

@GossiTheDog @Laird_Dave Sure, I can see that. But Microsoft has a lot of enterprise customers with CISOs, legal departments, regulatory requirements, etc. for whom Recall is worse than useless. That actually describes most of their largest enterprise customers!

Do they even pay attention to their own customers at all?

Sure enterprises can use GPO to turn it off but why make something that most of your biggest customers are going to have to turn off?

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • •
  • JUstTest
  • khanakhh
  • kavyap
  • thenastyranch
  • everett
  • tacticalgear
  • rosin
  • Durango
  • DreamBathrooms
  • mdbf
  • magazineikmin
  • InstantRegret
  • Youngstown
  • slotface
  • megavids
  • ethstaker
  • ngwrru68w68
  • cisconetworking
  • modclub
  • tester
  • osvaldo12
  • cubers
  • GTA5RPClips
  • normalnudes
  • Leos
  • provamag3
  • anitta
  • lostlight
  • All magazines
    •