@ncommander That's cool. I heard your typing sounds on the stream, so I assume you were using something like "buckle" passed through to OBS. That's what I do with CRT;
I run $ buckle 2>/dev/null &
inside of it and enjoy the buckle spring sound effects and pretend I don't have a membrane keyboard, lol.
This article is about 2 years old, but I'd like to get some opinions on the validity of the author's main premise that Linux is not as secure as people make it out to be. Indeed, in another article (link 2), the author even suggests that Windows 11, macOS, and ChromeOS are more secure than your average Linux distro.
As I'm learning about Bitcoin Lightning, I'm seeing some major red flags. To use it, you need an account with a service provider. It's a username/password type of custodial account. Then, the node has full control over your funds. They could shut down without warning, or transfer your funds. The only way to actually have control is to run your own node, but doesn't that defeat the purpose of Lightning? The whole point is to allow many users to transfer tiny amounts of money a lot, eg zaps. To me, it seems that Lightning nodes have all the problems of Mastodon. Imagine the problems of Mastodon, except it's your bank account. That's bad. What am I missing?
@r000t I think that actually goes against some kind of safety regulation. I thought that magnetized doors have to be unlocked from the outside or at least equipped with a key override in case of a power outage.
@SmudgeTheInsultCat
Your argument is a non-sequitur:
"If God can heal, why deaf people?"
I'll make one, too. Watch:
"If Democrat government good, why wildfire in Maui?"
