tuhriel

@tuhriel@discuss.tchncs.de

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

tuhriel,

It’s normal for a switch to strip a vlan tag when it sends a packet out, so that the endpoint doesn’t have to support vlans. Don’t worry about that. As far as the endpoint is concerned, it’s just normal subnetting.

okay that’s what I thought

When it’s on the other vlan, can you even ping it? When you check the packet capture, can you see the ping and response? Where does it get dropped?

if I try to ping it it doesn’t answer, the unifi logs do show that the packages have been forwarded to the subnet. If I use netcat to open a port on the other device it receives the connection request, but the NAS doesn’t recognize it. Maybe I have to do some Wiresharking on a mirror port to see what exactly comes back, hoped I could get around it

tuhriel,

So if I understand this right you will need to change the network on the port attached to the synology in your UniFi configuration or set the vlan tag in the synology OS, I would do the former.

doesn’t the switch terminate any VLAN tagging at the port? so if I add the VLAN to the DSM configuration it doesn’t receive any tagged packages and refuses them?

It sounds like you just added a second network/vlan to the existing interface which means you actually created a trunk and are getting the old network untagged and the new network with vlan tags which the synology is dropping.

with all the other devices in the IoT subnet it works with setting the VLAN on the port of the switch. If I check back on the unifi site, I found this:


<span style="color:#323232;">'Applying a VLAN to a Switch Port
</span><span style="color:#323232;">Native VLAN
</span><span style="color:#323232;">
</span><span style="color:#323232;">The Native VLAN is the VLAN assigned to "untagged" traffic passing through a switch port. Devices physically connected to a switch port will be placed on this Native VLAN.
</span><span style="color:#323232;">Tagged Networks and Trunk Ports
</span><span style="color:#323232;">
</span><span style="color:#323232;">Ports can be configured to allow traffic from other networks. Allowing specific networks/VLANs is referred to as “tagging” them on the switch port. You can see all ports’ VLAN tags in the VLAN Viewer, found in the Ports tab.
</span><span style="color:#323232;">
</span><span style="color:#323232;">Ports that have been tagged to allow traffic from multiple VLANs are referred to as “trunk” ports. By default, all ports on UniFi Switches are trunked to allow all VLANs. '
</span>

if I understand that in combination with your comment correctly: I set the native VLAN to 83 so everything tagged with 83 is correctly forwarded to the NAS and accepted there, stuff tagged with 1 are non native, the tag stays on and the NAS doesn’t accept it?

But that would make the Synology NAS quite hard to use in any corporate setting with multiple VLANs which need to interconnect and why does it work the other way around? while being in the default net 1 it does accept stuff from VLAN 83

Synology OS also doesn’t really support trunked ports through the UI (even though it does support a port that only uses a vlan tag) so it’s much easier to just leave them untagged.

which would mean, I can’t put it in the IoT net?

tuhriel,

Running tasker on a unrooted Fairphone 5 There is a function “System Lock” which locks the phone so you have to enter the PIN. I created a task and a widget on the home screen that triggers the task

I did give tasker some extra rights via adb, which is a quite straight forward process. I think the dev even has a guide for it…

tuhriel,

I also like that with the rest-server you can configure it with append-only, so even if someone wants to encrypt or delete the data they are not able to modify the existing backup

tuhriel,

It is at the scale they are working on, there’s a reason you can’t get an actual person to contact you… It’s too expensive to have actual people working these cases

tuhriel,

Also, everybody started the round the same, and it was your skill, knowledge of the map etc. Which made the difference, not if you had unlocked some better scopes or weapons

tuhriel,

Yeah, they are more leanient with their customers than with their products…

tuhriel,

Jake from the corridor crew did a video speculating what the reasoning is behind it: youtu.be/u2dIvUAd5QE?si=rC2Kg_c-hCy0niYF

tuhriel,

Yeah our law teacher always stressed that there is a big difference between having a right and getting your right

tuhriel,

For filesystems I have another gripe: if I move a file to another directory and I want to swap to the directory I just copied the stuff to I have to enter the whole path again…

tuhriel,

If a person set the rule it is definitely not an AI…

tuhriel,

I went exactly the same route as you, loved his old videos, HI. At some point I started to listen to the one with Myke (Cortex - had to look up the name) . The first few episodes where quite interesting, but it got repetitive at around episode 50 or so…

Now even the few videos he releases don’t really get me anymore

tuhriel,

And what do you do if you want to reference how fast the field moves, or why certain methods are not done anymore, but where found ‘good enough’ back in the days. You would still have to use the old source and cite them…

An absolute cut off doesn’t teach you anything…a guidance, how to identify good sources from bad or outdated ones would be much better

tuhriel,

Yeah, that’s why nobody does it that way, but that strawman you got there looks mighty fine…

tuhriel,

Yes but forwarding data to 700+ third parties is not what I would see as “privacy valuing”

Even if you can disable it…

tuhriel,

Bloodborne

Didn’t even got to the first boss my first “try” (actually a lot of tries) and shelved it as “I’m not gud enough”

After a colleague nagged me about it again I gave it another try (with a guide this time) and it clicked! 10/10 game of the decade

tuhriel,

They probably are waiting to not be alone…

tuhriel,

Nono, you buy the printer and AFTERWARDS they sell you a subscription on top.

That way they get paid twise, much better…

tuhriel,

True, but usually you buy them from retailers… This way they cut out the middleman. And the chance that you use 3rd party inks (although, that “security risk” got patched with firmware upgrades)

Also, they don’t just send you ink… It’s a monthly plan where you have x pages included. Unused pages are rolled over 3 times [1] and afterwards they probably are just lost.

Further, if you cancel the subscription, containers you received within the subscription wont work anymore.

Damn, I knew it was bad, but now that I read the details it’s even worse…

[1] www.hp.com/us-en/shop/cv/instantink

tuhriel,

That was last year, now it is an offence if you have your pinky up…You HAVE TO STAY UP TO DATE, MAN!!!

tuhriel,

Ah, nevermimd… Just got the info a few minutes ago, it’s mandatory again.

tuhriel,

Its the last version ist the one you just got, the final the one with the filename “offer_final_final_nowreally_2.0_final_actuallyfinal.pdf”

tuhriel,

Is it though? They stuff more and more things into the clock app… Somehow nobody wants to maintain ‘just an app that shows the time’ it needs timers, stop watches, world time, weather and whatever is somehow related to time

tuhriel,

Yes it does, and when I click on it, the Clock app opens… With all the bells and whistles

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • •
  • JUstTest
  • slotface
  • ngwrru68w68
  • everett
  • mdbf
  • modclub
  • rosin
  • osvaldo12
  • DreamBathrooms
  • thenastyranch
  • magazineikmin
  • Youngstown
  • GTA5RPClips
  • InstantRegret
  • megavids
  • kavyap
  • ethstaker
  • tacticalgear
  • tester
  • cubers
  • Durango
  • normalnudes
  • khanakhh
  • Leos
  • anitta
  • cisconetworking
  • provamag3
  • lostlight
  • All magazines
    •