wagesj45

wagesj45, 22 hours ago

Other than the finger having a tumor, this is pretty much perfect. :absolute_zozzle:

wagesj45, 22 hours ago

Alternate version.

#stablediffusion #sdxl #ai #aiart

wagesj45, 1 day ago

@GottaLaff Donald Trump Just Shut Up Challenge: IMPOSSIBLE

wagesj45, 2 days ago

@aaron.rupar yeesh. :pepe_disgust:

I'm willing to take the risk.

wagesj45, 3 days ago

@kellogh like the llm deletes stuff or we delete stuff from the llm?

wagesj45, 3 days ago

@kellogh I know pruning works pretty well with diffusion models. I think there's some talk of early-terminating layers and layer removal for LLMs.

I wonder how much you could remove from an LLM before things got weird.

wagesj45, 3 days ago

@kellogh I wonder how it could be done... 🤔

Just randomly zero out a vector component maybe. We should ask ChatGPT lol.

wagesj45, 4 days ago

@FatsGordo finally a man/bear post i can get behind

wagesj45, 4 days ago

:disappointment:

Connections
Puzzle #330
🟪🟩🟩🟩
🟦🟦🟩🟨
🟨🟨🟨🟨
🟦🟩🟦🟦
🟦🟩🟦🟦

wagesj45, 4 days ago

@aires The messaging needs some serious work, if that is the case.

wagesj45, 4 days ago

@deirdrebeth @aires I think you need to work on being kind online. I'm perfectly able to comprehend it. I also happen to find it insulting and counterproductive. Both are true.

wagesj45, 4 days ago

@Vorsos Does that include "broad criticism" about other groups as well? Races or sexual identities, maybe? There are certainly broad criticisms levied against those groups all the time.

wagesj45, 4 days ago

@Vorsos Maybe consider that you're disregarding men's feelings about being compared broadly to dangerous animals. This isn't valid criticism any more than your "mexican rapists" example. It is just as exclusionary and reactionary. You'd rightfully lambast men who made broad generalizations about women based on their personal intuition. You should hold yourself to the same standard.

You don't have to explain anything to me. I understand. I just think it is hypocritical and insulting.

wagesj45, 4 days ago

@stepheneb If you call me a dangerous animal, and then conclude that I must be dangerous or abusive for objecting to that, then it is about my feelings.

If someone says "You're a violent menance" and I say "Fuck off" who is deserving of respect?

wagesj45, 4 days ago

@petealexharris I don't think you would say the same to a black person, or a Muslim. You shouldn't be judgemental of men either. It's just as exclusionary and discriminatory.

wagesj45, 4 days ago

@petealexharris Their feelings are valid. What I'm saying is that mine are just as valid. Women can and should do what they need to feel safe. That doesn't mean I'm obligated to accept being demeaned by virtue of being a member of a certain group.

My beef is not with individuals that have feelings or experiences with strange men. My beef is with people that argue that those feelings are universally validated and that the demonization is deserved, actually.

wagesj45, 3 days ago

@quietewe I didn't ask anything. On the contrary, it is very freely being told to me that not only am I probably dangerous, but the fact I object to that characterization is proof that I am in fact dangerous.

wagesj45, 3 days ago

@quietewe It is very damaging to be accused of horrific things if you didn't do them. Reputation, standing, relationships, employment, etc. And to have the situation constructed that if you dislike being painted with that brush that it is even more proof that you're guilty is a problem.

I know most people who pick the bear are making an abstract point. I don't like it, but I understand it. What gets my goat is when people say that disagreement is proof that you must be abuser yourself.

wagesj45, 3 days ago

@lowqualityfacts What a lonely existence. :face_frown: