reckart, to opensource
@reckart@fosstodon.org avatar

INCEpTION is the text annotation tool of choice for 18 research groups whose papers are presented at LREC-COLING 2024 this week (20-25 May 2024) in Torino, Italy. Make sure to visit their talks or posters!

https://www.linkedin.com/posts/reckart_welcome-activity-7198287063576629248-JZlM?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop

lili, to Neuroscience
@lili@synapse.cafe avatar

I've been working on a way to annotate in multiple views, with feedback for inconsistencies across views. There's still some way to go, but already it feels so cool after years of labeling only 2D views!

felwert, to random
@felwert@fedihum.org avatar

Can someone recommend a good conceptual/theoretical article on in the /, particularly /? So not about specific tools, vocabularies etc., but on the very act of annotation, its purpose and its status as an intellectual activity?

msiemund, to random German
@msiemund@openbiblio.social avatar

Die zweite Version des Glossarartikels von @janhorstmann und mir ging diese Woche online
https://doi.org/10.17175/wp_2023_002_v2
Er ist Teil des Working Papers "Begriffe der Digital Humanities. Ein diskursives Glossar" der @DHTheorie https://zfdg.de/wp_2023
Alle Artikel darin folgen etwa demselben Aufbau. Ich möchte einen kleinen Einblick in unseren Beitrag geben:
Zu Beginn definieren wir den Begriff Annotation. [1/n]

proycon, to random
@proycon@social.anaproy.nl avatar

I'd like to announce the new major release of STAM: Stand-off Text Annotation Model. This is standalone data model for annotation on text. It comes with various low-level tooling such as libraries for Rust, Python and various command-line tools. This is a big research software project I've been working on for the past year for at and which I hope might prove useful for others: https://annotation.github.io/stam

forteller, to random
@forteller@tutoteket.no avatar

Fuck, hypothes.is won't let me annotate more than one identical piece of text in a pdf! If I try to annotate the same text in more than one location, all of them are just connected to the first place in the document where the text appears! So very annoying!

forteller,
@forteller@tutoteket.no avatar

https://dokie.li looks like an extremely cool alternative to for ! It even supports ! Wow!

But it seems to only work on pages you own and can implement it on, not on any website on the internet? Is that correct? Does anyone know?

erga_biodiv, to random Portuguese

Are you in need of expert advice on a specific genome or pipeline?

You can ask the ERGA Community for support with these and many other questions through our support request form!
Just head to our website 👉https://erga-biodiversity.eu/support

@ebpgenome @biogeneurope

msiemund, to random German
@msiemund@openbiblio.social avatar

Ich stelle mir in letzter Zeit immer häufiger die Frage, warum ich für meine Diss zu textueller Annotation "Markup" ausschließe und ob das so richtig ist.
Ich verstehe Annotation als ”eine (semantische)
Anreicherung von Untersuchungsgegenständen [...], das einzelne Aspekte von Untersuchungsgegenständen durch zeichenhafte Kodierung (Ergänzung) [expliziert] [und damit hilft eine Forschungsfrage zu beantworten, Anm. M.S.]“ (Horstmann & Seltmann, 2023). Also als eine Form von Kategorisierung [1/2]

msiemund,
@msiemund@openbiblio.social avatar

für die Beantwortung einer Forschungsfrage. Dafür betrachte ich zuerst einmal literaturwissenschaftliche Fragestellungen. So etwas wie Annotation der Redewiedergabe, von Erzählebenen etc. fällt für mich definitiv darunter. Nun frage ich mich, inwiefern sich das wirklich davon unterscheidet, soetwas wie Steichungen zu annotieren. Oder Personen auszuzeichnen. Hierfür ließen sich ja genauso konkrete Forschungsfragen finden. Vll muss ich den Ausschluss doch noch einmal überdenken. [2/2]

molly0xfff, to random
@molly0xfff@hachyderm.io avatar

been pretty delighted with lately, but just discovered the plugin (built on .is) and am now quite thrilled with it

bookish, to random
@bookish@historians.social avatar

Humanities instructors: What's the simplest tool for students to make marginal notes on a PDF and read one another's annotations? I don't want something fussy like .is or -- am not grading them on these, just want them to be able to read over each other's shoulders. I've used Google docs for text files, but is there an equivalent for PDFs (OCR only I assume)? Thanks for any advice!

mrhaki, to Java
@mrhaki@mastodon.online avatar

New post JDriven blog: Annotation based Dependency Injection: Breaking Down the Basics https://blog.jdriven.com/2023/07/Annotation-based-Dependency-Injection-Breaking-Down-the-Basics/

longreads, to LongReads
@longreads@mastodon.world avatar

"The current AI boom — the convincingly human-sounding chatbots, the artwork that can be generated from simple prompts, and the multibillion-dollar valuations of the companies behind these technologies — began with an unprecedented feat of tedious and repetitive labor." —Josh Dzieza for The Verge

https://www.theverge.com/features/23764584/ai-artificial-intelligence-data-notation-labor-scale-surge-remotasks-openai-chatbots

#AI

gnulinux, to linux German
@gnulinux@social.anoxinon.de avatar

Arbeitsweise: Xournal++

Erfahrungsbericht mit Xournal++ und Wacom zum Skripten von Lerninhalten mittels handschriftlicher Bearbeitung. Als Alternative für das Arbeiten mit Tablet und Stift.

++

https://gnulinux.ch/arbeitsweise-xournal

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • JUstTest
  • osvaldo12
  • InstantRegret
  • thenastyranch
  • magazineikmin
  • everett
  • rosin
  • Youngstown
  • slotface
  • cubers
  • cisconetworking
  • kavyap
  • GTA5RPClips
  • DreamBathrooms
  • megavids
  • tacticalgear
  • khanakhh
  • mdbf
  • Durango
  • ngwrru68w68
  • tester
  • normalnudes
  • ethstaker
  • provamag3
  • modclub
  • Leos
  • anitta
  • lostlight
  • All magazines