EricCarroll, to random

Had to do a lawyer face to face today.

First time back to a business office without any precautions running since March 13, 2020.

I am in a GVS Elipse

Everyone else walking around, eating, drinking, working, like it's 2019.

My lawyer tells me how cautious & risk adverse she is so she can't answer some points on the spot.

She says this with no irony at all, as she & her coworkers are busy rawdogging the inside air, just after the second largest peak in wastewater signal since the pandemic started.

In 4 years of surreal moments, this was right up there towards the peak of Mt. Surreal.

trendless, (edited ) to random

Get a new mask? Aerosolize some bitterant around the edges to test if it seals -- gaps that are best measured in μm may be hard to feel.

EricCarroll, to random

I wore my long enough.

It finally happened.

John Conly warned me about it. He was adamant it would happen. And it would be awful.

He was right.

It only took four years for the risk to materialize.

Yes. THAT RISK.

No, no. Not COVID infection.

ACNE.

From wearing a respirator.

The horror. The horror.

EricCarroll, to random

About to undertake the biggest "sailing on a schedule" exercise I have yet done.

We have bought a new house in the country, and plan to move soon.

Gonna be an interesting COVID risk management planning & execution exercise.

I foresee a great deal of time in coming up.

I have lived downtown since I was 18. I loved living downtown.

But the pandemic broke it, & its not getting fixed any time soon. Maybe ever.

It is incredibly hard to stay uninfected in a high density environment when everyone is throwing precaution to the wind.

So it is time to go.

I will still be in the GTA, and still commuting distance to the downtown core, if we get homesick & choose to come back.

But its time for trees, birds & nature walks.

With far less people around most of the time (111/km2 vs 8000/km2).

sb, to climate
@sb@fed.sbcloud.cc avatar

About 20 years ago I was convinced enough that our societal trend of ignoring scientific and medical advice en mass (read: / / ) would inevitably lead to the resurgence of preventable disease, such as .

I wrote Tom Brokaw Part I and Tom Brokaw Part II to explore these thoughts.

Where as in TBP I the orator can't seem to shake his "sentimental" cough, TBP II finds him perishing in a Tuberculosis wing of a hospital, as friends and family all come to visit unmasked.

https://tube.sbcloud.cc/w/a1g57jeC1oatA4WvzaMv1P

EricCarroll, to random

I just had a "sailing on a schedule" moment.

I took careful steps to ensure I understood how to do a complex process. Great.

Go to execute - blam - instructions were wrong. From a bank. 🙄

Had to run to a bank branch on a shot clock to get it done.

This is where risk increases, & mistakes happen. This is exactly what I meant by "sailing to a schedule".

Downtown financial district right where I used to work. Not as busy as pre-pandemic but way more people than I have seen in a looong time. Branch was full.

Zero (0) masks. Not on staff, not on customers. Pandemic is clearly over for the financial district.

I made a mistake of not taking my CO2 meter to assess air quality in the rush.

I wore to mitigate one way masking risk.

I have resigned myself to the mental model that my respirator is now no different in society than a wheelchair, cane or other ability assist for those of us who care about managing .

EricCarroll, to random

My furnace has failed.

I get to have a bunch of people in my house shortly to replace it before the Big Ontario Freeze descends on Saturday.

I feel like - I am having a constant dialogue with my threat & risk assessment module.

I will have to treat my home as a biohazard environment for most of a day.

& HEPA & oh my.

Replacing a furnace on a pipe-busting deadline is complicated & stressful.

Doing it while in today's world is 10x more complex and 100x more stressful.

If you recall my sailing analogy, we have to have a formal family safety briefing & contingency planning before it all gets started.

Then we have to maintain safety situational awareness while working a task on a deadline.

EricCarroll, to community

I used to have a sail boat. One of the most important rules in sailing is "don't sail on a schedule".

What this means is that if you have a destination & a deadline, you will override safety signals (like weather) & travel in unsafe conditions due to deadline pressure. This is how serious accidents happen while sailing.

Planning for sailing puts an emphasis on having a checklist that includes having situational awareness of issues like boat condition, charts, & weather by explicitly checking the marine weather forecasts.

Also you have to be prepared to bail on your destination & schedule if the safety signals change. You have to know where your closest port is to seek shelter if a storm arises.

It occurred to me that the equivalent is "don't be task focused on a deadline".

The need to get a task done by a deadline causes you to lose situational awareness, & accept risk that you would not otherwise accept if you thought your safety plan through ahead of time.

This is exacerbated by the total lack of a danger signal in society right now. No mitigations visible. Out of sight, out of mind.

This bit me yesterday getting a vaccination from an unmasked pharmacist in a small room. I took a risk I should not have, because I lost situational awareness under the drive to get the task done. I never would have accepted that risk in my pre-thought out safety plan. But it just popped up in the middle of the task, & I let it slide because I wasn't situationally aware.

Now, ofc I was wearing so the risk here is relative. My event was ocular exposure during high water mark for community transmission, not being maskless. But it is not a risk I would have taken in a pre-thought through safety plan.

And that's the big deal now. Every little ordinary task needs a safety plan.

It's frustrating. It's exhausting.

When it goes wrong, when the safety signals change, when you get off plan, you have to be prepared to "bail". Halt a task, walk out, cancel, reschedule. Find a safe port in the new storm.

I should have refused entry with a maskless pharmacist. Cancelled, requested accommodation & rescheduled.

This is a kind of risk "velocitization" that happens. I am getting velocitized into one-way masking even during high periods. Everyone else but me unmasked is the new normal.

This is how accidents happen - a bunch of little issues leading to an unwanted, unplanned outcome.

EricCarroll, to random

Its time to break out the with integrated face shield.

Arguably I should have been using it before now given the numbers.

The rising risk just sort of sneaks up on you now, with everyone unmasked there is no social signal of danger anymore.

And that's the point, isn't it?

EricCarroll, to random

I did the riskiest thing I have done in 3 years today especially given where

I let two people in my house to do an assessment for maintenance work that I had been pushing off for quite some time. It was do it now or lose the resource.

I asked them to wear head strap . They did. They both had beards so the fit wasn't great.

I turned up the 5 HEPAs we own to full. Plus kept the furnance circulation (which has a central HEPA) running full.

I opened the windows throughout the house.

We both wore our GVS Elipse in our own house the whole time.

I left the house empty for an hour post-vist: windows open & cranked.

Then checked my CO2 before re-entering to confirm the rate of decrease of CO2 over the hour to make sure I was getting good ACH.

I used nasal spray after returning.

Lotta effort.

Why? This is what looks like.

Because

trendless, to random

If I'd not seen the example set by proponents on :deadbirb: I would not have known that people actually wore elastomeric respirators in public to ward off SARS-CoV-2, nor had the courage to use them myself.

trendless, (edited ) to random

Wait, this isn't what you mean when you say 'double-mask and a faceshield'?

trendless, (edited ) to novid

SARS/COViD not mentioned, but truth seeping out, nonetheless.

> Researchers analyzed 1,048 CT scans from individuals aged 50 to 64, all of whom were participants in the Swedish cardiopulmonary bioimage study, or SCAPIS. Analysis of the scans also considered data such as diet and physical activity, as well as examination of immune cells in participants’ blood.

> The results showed that those with fatty degeneration of the thymus, as shown by the CT scan, also had lower T-cell regeneration, an indicator of immune system aging.

“This association with T-cell regeneration is interesting. It indicates that what we see in CT scans is not only an image, it actually also reflects the functionality of the thymus,” explained Lena Jonasson, another of the study’s authors.

> They also found that other factors, such as age, sex, and lifestyle, affected the appearance of the thymus.

> “We saw a huge variation in thymus appearance. Six out of ten participants had complete fatty degeneration of [the] thymus, which was much more common in men than in women, and in people with abdominal obesity. Lifestyle also mattered. Low intake of fibres in particular was associated with fatty degeneration of [the] thymus,” said Sandstedt.

https://www.iflscience.com/immune-system-aging-can-be-seen-with-a-simple-scan-71132

@novid

drclareharris, to mastodon
@drclareharris@newsie.social avatar

What I am appreciating and for about today is getting to know a few more and knowledgeable people who are trying their best to avoid Covid.

It takes effort and sadly some to stay .

Please consider a donation to https://donatemask.ca/ 🇨🇦


vox_n_thecosmos,

@drclareharris 100% Clare! I absolutely agree.

As someone who is living with I’m uniquely qualified to tell people they do not want it.

😷

or

🌬️

Adequate and are so important and not only for Covid.

Build a or

Buy a or BOTH!

Stay safe out there!

trendless, (edited ) to novid

There's one layer of swiss cheese that I would never omit:

Respirators.

This is the only layer that can prevent close-proximity transmission.

As long as you're wearing one that you know seals to your face and isn't soaked or super old, it's going to protect you from all the invisible ways can get into your nose and mouth.

And even if you haven't proven that it seals, it's damp, or you've worn it a bunch of times before, it's still going to provide more protection than any other layer(s).

Please, please don't think you can compensate for being unmasked by utilizing combinations of other layers.

All the other layers are designed to make a respirator more effective or provide backup in the event a respirator lets a bit of something through. Even vaccines were trialled in the context of universal masking; their original efficacy numbers are a product of that environment.

If you can't get your hands on any respirators, reach out and I'll connect you to someone in your region who can help. If I have to ship you some myself, I will.

@novid

trendless, (edited ) to random

I think we'd best have a conversation about mask efficacy in the context of time-to-infection, viral load and other highly-speculative estimations that have been proffered over the course of the pandemic thus far.

You cannot build a rock-solid scientific model on top of such things.

eyesquash, (edited ) to random
@eyesquash@mastodon.world avatar


What are masks for?

trendless, (edited )

@eyesquash it's true that aren't great at protecting against airborne pathogens / bioaerosols, either for the wearer or those around them, though if everyone was wearing them in shared air, levels of transmission would still be much lower.

Even imperfect, incomplete masking with non-respirators by a majority of the population contributed to the eradication of a particular strain of influenza in 2020-21. By now, however, SARS-CoV-2 has mutated to be far more contagious than any strain of flu; it's probably neck and neck with measles -- the most transmissible pathogen we know -- at the very least.

Respirators, otoh, are incredibly effective at protecting the wearer, though they are even better at protecting others.

In practice, an can achieve upwards of 99% inward filtration efficacy. is even better -- upwards of 99.97% -- rendering scv2 impotent, as long as the fit+seal are good.

That's why hospital infection prevention and control policy specifies N95s, elastomerics, or PAPRs in the presence of airborne pathogens -- and why it's unconscionable that they've continued to stick their collective heads in the sand, ignore science and the relevant in-field experts, and deny that .

It's unfortunate that so many have fallen victim to the deliberate mis/disinfo that masks don't work, especially given that so many of us have gone 3+ years without contracting -- or any other respiratory infection, for that matter.

@pfred60

TransitBiker, to random
@TransitBiker@urbanists.social avatar

3M elastomeric half face masks are lightweight & reliable respiratory protection when paired with the various P100 filter options & properly deployed/worn. They come in 3 sizes & are reusable with user replaceable parts. These (using the disc style filters) are also excellent for MRI & CT scans, as they contain no metal.

trendless,

Excellent thread on 3M filter options by @TransitBiker ☝️☝️☝️☝️

@novid

fulelo, to london
@fulelo@journa.host avatar

BBC News - warning: Outbreak could hit tens of thousands
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-66200444

neroden,

@fulelo

Of course is spread by and you can stop infection with or respirator masks.

Which also stop . And . And

Are we really not going to hear anyone in media say anything about that? Really? REALLY?

jhsu802701, to novid

I see but not or in the hashtags on the right hand side of this novid magazine page. How concerned should I be about oil-based particulates?

trendless, to novid

"The device ... allows electrical potentials of up to 40,000 volts to be obtained in a compact device ... The efficiency of the masks was tested after being washed in water; efficiency was significantly restored after brief exposure to the electric field generated by the device."

https://medicalxpress.com/news/2023-04-desktop-charger-voltage-replenish-electric.html

@novid

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • JUstTest
  • ngwrru68w68
  • everett
  • InstantRegret
  • magazineikmin
  • thenastyranch
  • rosin
  • GTA5RPClips
  • Durango
  • Youngstown
  • slotface
  • khanakhh
  • kavyap
  • DreamBathrooms
  • provamag3
  • ethstaker
  • osvaldo12
  • tester
  • cubers
  • cisconetworking
  • mdbf
  • tacticalgear
  • modclub
  • Leos
  • anitta
  • normalnudes
  • megavids
  • lostlight
  • All magazines