ct_bergstrom, (edited ) to random
@ct_bergstrom@fediscience.org avatar

This week, Science published a stunningly irresponsible news story entitled "Fake scientific papers are alarmingly common" and claiming that upward of 30% of the scientific literature is fake.

https://www.science.org/content/article/fake-scientific-papers-are-alarmingly-common

Below, the first two paragraphs of the story.

Headline and intro notwithstanding, the story itself later notes that the detector doesn't actually work and flags nearly half of real papers as fake. Does the reporter just not understand that?

h/t @Hoch

KFuentesGeorge,

@ct_bergstrom

This is wild, because there is no goddamn way in hell I would ever submit a paper with this shoddy of a research design, unless I was a complete idiot, or actively trying to push a specific agenda that I knew couldn't be defended.

I legitimately cannot imagine the absolute caucasity to write, submit, edit, proof, and then publish this trash. Unbelievable. By their OWN INFO, it has a false positivity rate of 44%?!? Absolute TRASH.

thomasjorgensen, to fediverse
@thomasjorgensen@eupolicy.social avatar
psychoSoph, to random German

English below.

Lange habe ich drüber nachgedacht, nun ist es so weit: bekommt eine -Seite, auf der ihr den Comic unterstützen könnt! ✨ Was gibt es dort? 🧵

https://ko-fi.com/psychosoph

psychoSoph,

Deutsch oben.

I’ve been thinking about it for a very long time and here it is: has a page now where you can support the comic! ✨ What waits for you there? 🧵

https://ko-fi.com/psychosoph

You can just follow me, give a one-time tip (or every time a chapter goes online) or even get a membership where you support me monthly. 🧠 With this you help me keep the psychoSoph website running.

upol, to fediverse
@upol@hci.social avatar

There are days I feel down.

On those days, I open the emails from predatory journals.

Reading how "esteemed" and "honorable" I am gives me the push I need to carry on 😅

Thanks, Predatory Journals for doing your bit for mental health.

nielsmede, to science

How do people with views of inform themselves and communicate about it? 🔬

In our new study, @mss7676 @j_metag and I find: Science-related populists prefer and social networking sites, and are more likely to comment scientific content online. But they don’t avoid journalistic media in general, so they don’t ‘disconnect’ from science 🪢🔬
Paper: https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2022-0059


@IKMZ @commodon @communicationscholars

drcaberry, to random
@drcaberry@blacktwitter.io avatar


Does anyone else dream of exam questions and solutions or it is jut me? I had to get up early this morning and write them down before I forget them.

writingmonicker, to random
@writingmonicker@mstdn.social avatar

Nothing hits quite like the weekend after a presentation 🥳🎉😴

psychoSoph, to science German
drcaberry, to random
@drcaberry@blacktwitter.io avatar
drcaberry, to random
@drcaberry@blacktwitter.io avatar

Answer in the follow on thread:
If you close S1 and S2, which two bulb have the same brightness? 👩🏾‍🎓👷🏾‍♀️👩🏾‍💻👩🏾‍🏫

drcaberry, (edited )
@drcaberry@blacktwitter.io avatar

Answer in the follow on thread:
If you close S1 and S2, which two bulb have the same brightness? 👩🏾‍🎓👷🏾‍♀️👩🏾‍💻👩🏾‍🏫

petersuber, to academicchatter
@petersuber@fediscience.org avatar

The most interesting critique of I've read in a long time is by @a_m_mastroianni.
https://www.experimental-history.com/p/science-is-a-strong-link-problem

The gist: We treat science as a weak-link problem (in which we fear opening the gates to the worst stuff) when when it's properly a strong-link problem (in which we should fear closing the gates to the best stuff).

h/t @DailyNous, who applied Mastroianni's thesis to .
https://dailynous.com/2023/04/17/whats-so-bad-about-bad-philosophy/

,
@academicchatter

samfordsaunders, to random

A little disappointed that we're using . or when was RIGHT THERE.

petersuber, to philosophy
@petersuber@fediscience.org avatar


Hi Mastodon. I work for to research in all fields and regions. Formerly directed the Harvard Office for Scholarly Communication. Now semi-retired but still working for the cause.

Also a professor of emeritus and non-practicing .

More detail on my home page.
http://bit.ly/petersuber

Part of the , .

Tooting on professional topics and .

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • JUstTest
  • thenastyranch
  • magazineikmin
  • InstantRegret
  • everett
  • osvaldo12
  • Youngstown
  • mdbf
  • slotface
  • rosin
  • kavyap
  • Durango
  • ngwrru68w68
  • GTA5RPClips
  • megavids
  • DreamBathrooms
  • khanakhh
  • Leos
  • cisconetworking
  • ethstaker
  • modclub
  • tester
  • cubers
  • tacticalgear
  • provamag3
  • normalnudes
  • anitta
  • lostlight
  • All magazines