@seanb honestly, if I were you I would reach out to the news company and ask them if they want to look after their domain themselves. Are you charging them more than 30 bucks a year? The move you describe in your article doesn't shine a good light on you.
@passthejoe in 99% of the cases (even though I haven't had more than 20 cases probably) where I thought #aws was it fault it was actually me... what's not working?
Working on a browser extension that supports both automatic blocking and soft-blocking of Twitter Blue users. If the soft-blocking mode is set, it can hide tweets from Twitter Blue users without needing to send any requests to the Twitter server. It also has support for excluding accounts you follow or who have more than X followers.
@malwaretech@GossiTheDog not really accurate. They can alter the response format. Still, it's more "expensive" for them to do this compared to changing the UI.
So Google is now preventing people from removing location data from photos taken with Pixel phones.
Remember when Google's corporate motto was "don't be evil?"
Obviously, accurate location data on photos is more useful to a data mining operation like Google.
From Google: "Important: You can only update or remove estimated locations. If the location of a photo or video was automatically added by your camera, you can't edit or remove the location."