CodingSquirrel, Even better, when they film vertically, and then encode it to widescreen. Ensuring that no matter how you view it on a phone it's microscopic.
HeavyRaptor, I love it when it’s a phone recording of a landscape 16:9 video playing with the phone in vertical orientation and huge black bars above and below. Then I can view this on my 21:9 monitor with extreme black bars on the sides and a teeny-tiny picture in the middle.
coffeeaddict, Omg I really really hate this with a passion
EdibleFriend, This is the only thing i really hate. I don’t give a shit about vertical anymore. We lost that battle.
idunnololz, Just like my penis
7u5k3n, It’s a problem
HiddenLayer5, Not really for very short video because 99% of the time you’ll be watching it on your phone which is vertical by default. For long video horizontal is better.
GrammatonCleric, Ah yes, nothing like seeing a 16:9 picture pan-and-scanned on a portrait display.
It’s not a generational thing; it’s a filming standard.
jinarched,
The_Picard_Maneuver, Oh god, please no.
EmperorHenry, I still record my home videos horizontal.
possiblylinux127, Fixed it
The_Picard_Maneuver, This pains me so. Great job.
Socsa, We used to and we still do too.
books, Shouldn’t you be filming for the device?
Like tiltok should be vertical and yt should be horizontal?
Dublin112, Until Vine and later tiktok, basically the whole Internet was in the horizontal format and vertical videos would play with huge black boxes on the left and right and in turn you can’t really make out the details of the videos as well because they were so small on those screens. Today’s internet is very different and has things actually designed for vertical videos so complaining about it makes no sense anymore.
possiblylinux127, Except it does. It is such a waste of space to film like that. If anything film a square
Epicurus0319, We all know the best way to film is in the shape of a circle
HughJanus, Today’s internet is very different and has things actually designed for vertical videos so complaining about it makes no sense anymore.
It absolutely makes sense. You can design whatever you want for vertical videos but it makes no difference if the actual content isn’t designed for it.
How many times have you seen videos with multiple people falling out of frame while simultaneously half the frame consists of ground and sky? Then the camera operator viciously whips back and forth to try to capture everything, creating a jarring fuckin video? How many times do you see TikTokkers trying to contort their bodies so you can actually see what’s going on in the image behind them? What difference does the size of resolution of the image make when half of it is consumed by nothing important?
fallingcats, That probably means they should’ve zoomed out, regaldless of orientation
Honytawk, To create even bigger empty spaces of ground and sky?
fallingcats, Once you’ve got everything you can just crop to where the action is happening later, as well as chose a different aspect ratio if need be
HughJanus, Crop it? Sooo then you’re just back to horizontal but at a significantly degraded resolution…
fallingcats, Not really. Most phones can film in 4k and most services compress it to absolute shit anyway nowadays. You’re not losing much but cropping first
maddenim, It’s often hard to adapt already existing horizontal videos into vertical videos, but the current high prevalence of vertical video platforms create incentive to create better editing tricks. I personally am often surprised how they accommodate for these situations now a days
HughJanus, I mean yes I agree but it’s a shoddy workaround for a manufactured problem.
CaptainBlagbird, I’d say you should be filming for the content.
Someone on a pogo stick in the backyard? Vertically.
Your pet running around in the backyard? Probably horizontally.
Your friend planking in the backyard? Definitely horizontally. Not at all, get new friends.
rickdg, The medium is the message and all that.
FreshLight, …and I hate it
Thcdenton, Vertical was foretold long ago
https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/67f03bf0-df5e-413c-bdce-866d469e52e4.jpeg
sockenklaus, Which movie is it?
Alenalda, Looks like 2001
YeetPics, Film is way too grainy, had to be filmed sometime earlier. Maybe '65-70? We may never know.
Barometer3689, Woosh. He meant 2001: a space odyssey
YeetPics, DoubleWooosh I know, the movie was produced in 1967
Barometer3689, Oh my god. It took me a while to figure out what this meant. I guess I was wooshed while attempting to point out a non existent woosh.
YeetPics, Hey it’s all good, many folks haven’t seen 2001 yet and it’s sad. Keep sharing it!
MargotRobbie, Note to self: “2 Fast 2 Barbie”(working title) should now be filmed vertically in order to appeal to Gen Z on Tik Tok.
xrtxn, Akschually filming it vertically is not good because we can’t insert subway surfers gameplay under the movie. It should be filmed like a small rectangle
ezures, 4:3 superiority is back baby
AMDIsOurLord, WHAT is up with that shit anyway? It’s so annoying
Lesrid, (edited ) At first I thought it was just a method to avoid copyright detection. It may have started as that but the 22yr old I live with says it gives people something else to do while watching the movie so they don’t get bored.
Daft_ish, It stimulates my brain meat.
possiblylinux127, Just make sure the main plot happens in the first 3 seconds or else they will get bored
zalgotext, At the very least make sure Subway Surfers is playing in one of the corners
ImmaculateTaste, i genuinely hate this, it hurts my eyes and is unwatchable
HerbalGamer, this is a thing?
misophist, Yes.
friend_of_satan, Just like in Back to the Future II
HerbalGamer, oh god why
Psychodelic, So people on lemmy are pretty fuckin old eh? Interesting…
tigeruppercut, hey, some of us are merely kinda fuckin old
Ziglin, I wouldn’t even consider myself that and I still mock people taking vertical pictures
Meowoem, Yeah I know what you mean, it only seems like yesterday that that upstart Daguerre began with his gosh darn foolish portrait orientation photographs, of course we didn’t call them that then, we called 'em daguerreotypes…
friend_of_satan, Vertical pictures, known as portrait orientation, with many professional cameras coming with a second buttons and dials just to accommodate that orientation, are a problem? I thought it was just vertical video.
Kolanaki, (edited ) I still question why so many people find it so difficult to just turn the phone 90 degrees to the side when you film with it. Is it because you think you look like a dork when you film a selfie with two hands? Because that’s not why you look like a dork.
FlyingSquid, I usually hold my phone horizontally to shoot video, but it definitely is easier to hold it vertically. After all, it was designed to be held vertically.
StitchIsABitch, Admittedly you would look like a dork if you filmed at a 45 degree angle.
tigeruppercut,
Emerald, Oh wow I didn’t know there was a word for this, i love making dutch angle photos
Meowoem, A lot of the time it’s not that people can’t or are scared to, they just don’t feel the need to because most the video they watch is in vertical format. It’s not being filmed for cinema release, it’s for phones and tablets.
M137, I never had a problem with this. It’s not like whole movies or long youtube videos are recorded vertically. The kind of content that is recorded vertically is mainly watched on phones, and it’s not like it’s unwatchable on any other screen. Never once have I seen anyone say anything about it that is anything more than mild inconvenience about something they really shouldn’t care that much about. It’s just stereotypical “complaining because you can” bullshit that is so common.
FIST_FILLET, i’m not 110% in agreement (more like 65%) but you deserve an upvote for being the only person in here to defend it
Add comment