gregeganSF,
@gregeganSF@mathstodon.xyz avatar

A sphere is the nicest surface with constant Gaussian curvature κ=1, but these surfaces also have κ=1, except at the cusps.

In cylindrical coords:

z = √(1-χ²) E(arcsin(ρ/χ) | χ²/(χ²-1))

z is measured from a cusp
χ is radius of equator
E is an elliptic integral of the 2nd kind

A sphere deforms, stretching along one axis and shrinking in width into something like a prolate ellipsoid, but with a cusp at the poles.

gregeganSF,
@gregeganSF@mathstodon.xyz avatar

For each shape in the family shown above, there is also a whole family of helical versions, again with constant Gaussian curvature κ=1.

Any number of these pieces (with enough pitch not to self-intersect) could be joined along meridians, potentially making an infinite ribbon.

A shape like a prolate ellipsoid with cusps at the poles is cut open along a meridian and stretched vertically, with the circles of latitude deforming into helices.

gregeganSF,
@gregeganSF@mathstodon.xyz avatar

The endless ribbon version.

sundew,
@sundew@mstdn.social avatar

@gregeganSF It's like the old saying:
"If life gives you lemons, make an endless ribbon with constant Gaussian curvature."

ngons,
@ngons@mathstodon.xyz avatar

@gregeganSF now that’s what i call a cool shape. Now there are no cusps, so is all the curvature 1?

gregeganSF,
@gregeganSF@mathstodon.xyz avatar

@ngons The curvature is still 1 everywhere except the boundaries, where strictly speaking it is undefined.

The coolest thing would be to create something without cusps or boundaries, but there is no way to create a “complete” manifold – where every geodesic can be extended – that has constant positive curvature and infinite area.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Myers%27s_theorem

henryseg,
@henryseg@mathstodon.xyz avatar

@ngons @gregeganSF Is it cool to do impossible things? Doing nearly impossible things is often cool, but I’m not sure that property extends to the limit.

ngons,
@ngons@mathstodon.xyz avatar

@gregeganSF @henryseg :D I think coolness isn’t a topological invariant - clearly maths art is all about maximizing subjective coolness under homeomorphisms ..

ngons,
@ngons@mathstodon.xyz avatar

@gregeganSF that makes sense, i forgot about the edges, only considered you got rid of the north and south poles. Perhaps an infinite cylinder would do it though

Ianagol,

@gregeganSF Someone needs to make that by sewing together cut up tennis balls.

Ianagol,

@gregeganSF Conchiglie?

irving,
@irving@mastodon.social avatar

@gregeganSF Is it right that you need at least 2 cusps?

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • GTA5RPClips
  • DreamBathrooms
  • InstantRegret
  • ethstaker
  • magazineikmin
  • Youngstown
  • thenastyranch
  • mdbf
  • slotface
  • rosin
  • modclub
  • kavyap
  • cisconetworking
  • osvaldo12
  • JUstTest
  • khanakhh
  • cubers
  • Durango
  • everett
  • ngwrru68w68
  • tester
  • normalnudes
  • tacticalgear
  • anitta
  • megavids
  • Leos
  • provamag3
  • lostlight
  • All magazines