tness16, to Bulgaria
@tness16@mastodon.social avatar
masterdon1312, to random
@masterdon1312@mastodon.social avatar

Fuck these cunts promoting the ... me now if your beliefs align with dumb horse shoe !

nono2357, to ilaughed French
gimulnautti, to ai
@gimulnautti@mastodon.green avatar

”Fun” detail about Musk’s new : It defaults to inaccurate mode.

So nothing new on that side, and are just so funny that they’re apparently worth amplifying by building an industrial-grade LLM service to do so on a systematic basis. 🤯

https://www.vice.com/en/article/7kxqp9/elon-musks-grok-ai-is-pushing-misinformation-and-legitimizing-conspiracies

nando161, to conspiracy
@nando161@kolektiva.social avatar

Ngl is a skeleton key that opens up a lot of thinking, it is at least vacuous and at worst irresponsible to explore most without understanding how deep the Protocols of the Elders of Zion truly goes

gimulnautti, to ai
@gimulnautti@mastodon.green avatar

Folks are getting really confused: Statistical analysis of publicly released works is .

and reproducability of style needs to be resolved by legally binding requirements to providing machine learning tools.

Legitimate research is except from for a good reason: We have built departments producing innumerable of and on that.

AI companies selling product are not. By @mmasnick

https://www.techdirt.com/2023/08/08/the-fear-of-ai-just-killed-a-very-useful-tool/

analyticus, to afterlife

Is there life after death?

Is there an afterlife or is this the only life we get? Most believe science says there is no afterlife. But this view, while common, is wrong.
It required thousands of years of careful study of the natural world. Today, modern science offers answers to this age-old mystery.

Contrary to popular wisdom, the existence of an afterlife is an inescapable conclusion of many of today’s scientific theories.

🔗 https://alwaysasking.com/is-there-life-after-death/

#death #afterlife #science #theories

Private
jeffgreene,
@jeffgreene@mastodon.social avatar

x/ Dinsmore et al make a strong argument for considering both theoretical and metatheoretical foundations of that either explicitly or implicitly address common phenomena. And they ask researchers to set aside biases and personal preferences to work toward productive integration. These are important calls to the field, which echo ones I made in my prior work on development in . https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10648-022-09682-5

@edutooters @psychology

jimdonegan, to Cosmology
@jimdonegan@mastodon.scot avatar
  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • JUstTest
  • kavyap
  • DreamBathrooms
  • thenastyranch
  • magazineikmin
  • tacticalgear
  • khanakhh
  • Youngstown
  • mdbf
  • slotface
  • rosin
  • everett
  • ngwrru68w68
  • Durango
  • megavids
  • InstantRegret
  • cubers
  • GTA5RPClips
  • cisconetworking
  • ethstaker
  • osvaldo12
  • modclub
  • normalnudes
  • provamag3
  • tester
  • anitta
  • Leos
  • lostlight
  • All magazines