aral, to random
@aral@mastodon.ar.al avatar

Those of you caught up debating the technical minutiae of federating with Threads are missing the forest for the trees.

This is about one thing: Affording social capital to/normalising/legitimising Meta/Facebook/surveillance capitalism (and thereby delegitimising those who oppose them).

Hey, if the author of Mastodon thinks Meta/Facebook/Instagram/surveillance capitalism is socially acceptable there must be something wrong with you if you don’t.

So thanks for that, Eugen.

(Yes, I’m livid.)

john380,

@davep @aral @rriemann Agreed, I don’t see any additional access here. A slightly more depressing view is that an open system like the cannot survive open long term because / #’AI’ will scrape our data/private to oblivion. Invite only might be the only way forward

hehemrin, to sustainability

When I cleanup in my e-mail accounts by deleting and when relevant save a file or move the e-mails to local folder on my own disc only - I wonder how much energy I save per e-mail/byte when the data is not stored (also) on a server that is always on (with backups).

MalthusJohn,

@hehemrin

Probably not much, and depending on how you look at it, it could use more.

As with most things, our usage is the real problem. When (process change, etc) allows + to flow & accumulate in new places in the system, it won't be long until the adjusts to this new stock.

The 'paperless' promise never came with an impact study or similar studies for the , behavioral consequences, etc.

An almost entirely overlooked result, across the board wherever you look in , is that these adjustments are functionally equivalent to removing checkpoints where flow is bottlenecked. In our market-based system, lowering costs to consumers means increasing said behavior-- at least indirectly, as a consequence of marketers' narratives of abundance & perpetual .

Now sprinkle in some competition, and the race to the bottom begins: when you can't lower your price anymore (to attract biz away from comp) you offer these 'packages' of increasing use, all ending at the constraint of "unlimited". (>bandwidth magnifies use too)

It's a nice plot-twist in the standard narrative of the . Unfortunately, reasonable & moral actions such as yours are not the same ones that will resolve into necessary change.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • megavids
  • thenastyranch
  • rosin
  • GTA5RPClips
  • osvaldo12
  • love
  • Youngstown
  • slotface
  • khanakhh
  • everett
  • kavyap
  • mdbf
  • DreamBathrooms
  • ngwrru68w68
  • provamag3
  • magazineikmin
  • InstantRegret
  • normalnudes
  • tacticalgear
  • cubers
  • ethstaker
  • modclub
  • cisconetworking
  • Durango
  • anitta
  • Leos
  • tester
  • JUstTest
  • All magazines