Sustainable2050, to random
@Sustainable2050@mastodon.energy avatar

Massive expansion of offshore wind agreed upon in Denmark! Details announced of plans to increase its current 2.3 GW by between 9 and 14 GW within a decade. The additional capacity should produce around 35-55 TWh/year, that's 100-160% of current national electricity consumption.
https://kefm.dk/aktuelt/nyheder/2023/maj/danmarkshistoriens-stoerste-havvindsudbud-er-paa-plads

afewbugs, to random
@afewbugs@social.coop avatar
kravietz, to random

Theory of is that it’s very low surface power density, and the practice is that because of this, it occupies vast amounts of one non-renewable resource that everyone forgets about: land surface. In terms of surface power density PV outputs 6.63 W/m2, wind power 1.84 W/m2. Nuclear - 240.81 W/m2. That means for one 1 W of power you need to allocate 120x more land for wind than nuclear, and that is not only for the space occupied by the actual plant but everything: mining, manufacturing, operations, decommissioning.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/may/21/solar-farms-energy-power-california-mojave-desert

Some people will argue that utility-scale renewables are not good indeed, but we should stick to decentralised rooftop or wall PV installations. Except that decentralisation requires vast redundancy of infrastructure (cabling, inverters), much lower efficiency, which results in 4x higher production cost (LCOE) per kWh, thus nullifying the claimed lower cost of renewables.

Engineers have been trying to get that message to the broad public long ago: a PV farm or wind turbine look really nice at distance. But an utility-scale renewables power plant is what any other power plant is: a huge, industrial compound, installed on steel and concrete foundation interfering with the land it occupies.

kravietz,

@chowderman

Wind farm is not just the towers. The towers need to be built, which requires first making roads good enough for heavy equipment. Each tower is a massive construction made of concrete and steel 1st picture of tower foot alone). It’s also a huge machine that needs to be serviced, for example replacing 400 liters of gearbox oil (2nd photo of a collapsed gearbox with oil spilled in the field), so the roads need to be maintained (3rd photo gives you an idea of the road network density).

They also need to be connected by high-voltage cabling. An additional complication is that wind farms make sense where well, it’s windy, so usually elevated places such as hills.

This creates a very tangible competition between nature conservation and wind farms, which was one of the major factors preventing on-shore wind expansion in German, France, Norway and UK. Once of the most notable examples was cutting 14 millions of trees to make space for a wind farm in Scotland a few years ago:

https://www.heraldscotland.com/news/18270734.14m-trees-cut-scotland-make-way-wind-farms/

Huge wind turbine gearbox and part of a wing damaged on the ground
Map of servicing roads connecting hundreds of wind towers

Sustainable2050, to random
@Sustainable2050@mastodon.energy avatar

Average cost overrun for new power plants:
Nuclear 120%
Hydro dams 75%
Fossil 16%
Wind 13%
Solar 1%

The table is from p. 192 in , https://sites.prh.com/how-big-things-get-done-book
Via author @bentflyvberg on the birdsite.

arielkroon, to waterlooregion
@arielkroon@wandering.shop avatar

It is so incredibly, irritatingly windy in especially in the concrete canyons downtown (you don't get a pass either :/) Given the whole innovation spiel we love to tell ourselves so much, why aren't we some hub of in-city wind-based technology? Let's at least put this frigging annoyance to work for us.

@waterlooregion

Sustainable2050, to random
@Sustainable2050@mastodon.energy avatar

Finland's new nuclear power plant temporarily throttles its production as electricity price plunges. This will happen more frequently as Finland is experiencing a big wind power boom, with lower marginal cost of electricity than nuclear.
https://yle.fi/a/74-20032375

CharlieMcHenry, to random
@CharlieMcHenry@connectop.us avatar
robhawkes, to random

Ever wanted to know what the near-future, ginormous 3.6GW Dogger Bank wind farm would be generating today? What about last week, or even last year?

Wait no longer! This experimental feature is now live and you can enable it by clicking the ✨ button on the map.

https://renewables-map.robinhawkes.com

video/mp4

robhawkes, to renewableenergy

Absolutely love that there's a cargo ship for wind turbine blades called Blade Runner 2 🤖

https://www.vesselfinder.com/vessels/details/9287754

TheConversationClimate, to sustainability
@TheConversationClimate@newsie.social avatar

California has huge offshore power potential, but the ocean gets too deep too fast to build wind turbine towers directly on the seafloor.

The solution: floating wind farms. Five companies just bid US$757 million to lease ocean areas to build them. (from @TheConversationUS)

https://theconversation.com/how-do-floating-wind-turbines-work-with-5-companies-winning-the-first-us-leases-to-build-wind-farms-off-californias-coast-lets-take-a-look-196103

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • JUstTest
  • rosin
  • mdbf
  • khanakhh
  • ethstaker
  • osvaldo12
  • DreamBathrooms
  • thenastyranch
  • magazineikmin
  • InstantRegret
  • Youngstown
  • everett
  • slotface
  • kavyap
  • anitta
  • cubers
  • Durango
  • modclub
  • tacticalgear
  • ngwrru68w68
  • tester
  • GTA5RPClips
  • provamag3
  • cisconetworking
  • normalnudes
  • Leos
  • megavids
  • lostlight
  • All magazines