@psvrh@lemmy.ca avatar

psvrh

@psvrh@lemmy.ca

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

psvrh,
@psvrh@lemmy.ca avatar

Yes.

Because by that point, the Boomers will have been soaked for trillions by the LTC industry. The investors will have already be rich and will have moved on to the next victim.

psvrh,
@psvrh@lemmy.ca avatar

Now I’m wondering about hummingbirds.

psvrh,
@psvrh@lemmy.ca avatar

Hey, Log Cabin Republicans: these are your guys, you know that?

psvrh,
@psvrh@lemmy.ca avatar

Safeway/Freshco are Sobeys banners, so not really much better than Loblaw.

Canadian Home Prices "Need" To Be High To Pay For Retirements: PM - Better Dwelling (betterdwelling.com)

Canadian real estate prices have surged in almost every market, with a typical home price doubling in many regions. A median household in major cities like Toronto and Vancouver would need to save over 20 years for just the down payment, more than 3x the historic average. Seems absurd? The outlandish scenario was apparently a...

psvrh,
@psvrh@lemmy.ca avatar

Since LTC was privatized, the cost of care has skyrocketed, and the LTC industry and it’s hangers-on are salivating at the idea of soaking Boomers for every cent their house equity is worth.

This isn’t poetic license on my part, either. I’ve been in board meetings with executives who say exactly this: their five- and ten-year plans amount to “suck the Boomers dry”. The former premier of Ontario, for example…

Trudeau and his government are just the latest in a long line of neoliberal tools that started with Mulroney: killing unions, watching as companies’ pension funds were underfunded, destroying bonds as a viable savings mechanism, allowing the stock market to become a lottery of quarterly price-inflation: all of it because the market values next quarter over next-quarter century, and each government was convinced that somehow, some way, it’d all work out, or at least that by the time it crashes they’ll be out.

psvrh,
@psvrh@lemmy.ca avatar

Not their problem. They, and especially their backers, expect to be well out of it by that point. The rich don’t really think about the future; they think about how things were in the past, and how to keep it going, but they don’t really plan or fret about the future because they don’t have to.

If you want this problem to be fixed sooner, the government and their backers need to start being afraid enough for their bank accounts, if not their lives, to do something now.

That’s how we got the modern welfare state: the rich and their pets in government were afraid they’d get Russia-in-1917’ed and begrudgingly put in the supports needed to prevent people from being that pissed off. After all, we’d just had a world war and there were millions of vets returning with PTSD and training and an informal support network, and they weren’t going to put up with a repeat of the 1930s.

Every action since then is the rich trying to claw back the New Deal and it’s equivalents in other countries.

psvrh,
@psvrh@lemmy.ca avatar

Halo is almost a quarter century.

Wolfenstein is 30ish

Now, imagine how us Gen-Xers who grew up with Karateka or Epic Games feel.

psvrh,
@psvrh@lemmy.ca avatar

It’s not that, it’s more that two raging narcissists can’t occupy the same space at the same time.

You end up with a kind of NPD supercriticality.

psvrh,
@psvrh@lemmy.ca avatar

If Democrats want change, this is how to do it:

  1. Win general elections; vote blue no matter who. 2 Primary out the corporatist candidates every chance there is, right down to the level of school trustee.

This actually works, as we’ve seen with the GOP and their turn to rabid fascism. It can also work for good.

psvrh,
@psvrh@lemmy.ca avatar

Yup, but it’s possible to slow that rate and (if we’re smart and motivated) geoengineer ways to reverse it.

Again, though, it would require the rich to make less money.

But yes, in general I agree with you; even if we pull out the stops we’re already locked into some kind of increase, but that worse part is that it seems like we’re going to do is go hell-for-leather because the rich don’t have all the money yet.

psvrh,
@psvrh@lemmy.ca avatar

We need the rich to accept making less money, worldwide.

That’s really it.

We can probably slow the rate of increase and even begin to reverse it, but we need to convince the rich that they need to accept making less money.

psvrh,
@psvrh@lemmy.ca avatar

I maintain we need to measure social group distance in a unit I’ll call “Niemollers”, after the pastor and poet.

As in “how many Niemollers am I away from '…and there was no one left to speak for me '”

Because the Log Cabin Republicans are probably three Niemollers. He’ll Clarence Thomas is five, maximum.

psvrh,
@psvrh@lemmy.ca avatar

That would be true of landlords didn’t also know that and, in turn, redline rent to the maximum tenants can possibly pay.

I don’t know about the US specifically, but In Canada, investors big and small have bought up all the rental stock and rents are now maxed out beyond what many people can pay.

psvrh,
@psvrh@lemmy.ca avatar

Netanyahu put a target on every Jew’s back just to save his own political skin.

psvrh,
@psvrh@lemmy.ca avatar

The software world is littered with the corpses of companies that did something successful and attracted the attention of Microsoft.

psvrh,
@psvrh@lemmy.ca avatar

Dear media,

You’re maybe two verses of Niemoller’s poem from “…and there was no one to speak for me.”.

Stop carrying water for this man and his sycophants, it will not end well for you, or anyone you care about.

psvrh,
@psvrh@lemmy.ca avatar

Because these people write big endowment cheques to the university, whereas faculty and students are just blood-sucking overhead.

This is interesting to watch, in sad sort of way: the universities were generally fine with protests and activism as long as it didn’t cost them anything or threaten their donors’ ego. LGBTQ or race issues? Fine, that’s okay, no threat there, heck painting things rainbow and waving flags makes us feel good! Offend some rich donors and out comes the proverbial–if not literal–nightsticks.

I still remember being at UofT in 1995 and the only protests (on campus, not those directed at Harris) were when the administration got uppity that bands and student groups were making it hard to hear the TD Bank pavilion’s marketing spiel as they tried to hook students on 25% credit cards. Normal drunken debauchery-slash-activism was fine, but don’t dare get in the way of profits!

psvrh,
@psvrh@lemmy.ca avatar

I’d posit that a point you’re missing under “We need” is "to tax the rich more to pay for the services and supports needed to manage the number of immigrants we plan to build.

You’re right about immigration, but the problem, like anything our governments (LPC or CPC) do is that they’ll do half the solution; the easy, cheap part (immigration, decriminalizing drugs, setting healthcare and education standards) but not the hard and expensive part (building infrastructure, providing treatment and housing-first at scale, actually spending money on teachers, doctors and/or nurses), and the reason they do the cheap part is they’re ideologically unable to ask the rich to make do with less.

psvrh,
@psvrh@lemmy.ca avatar

I mean, Windows 98’s “Active Desktop” was pretty much this.

Someone at Microsoft has been trying to make MSN a thing for almost thirty years, and they’re sure that if they ram it down out throats just one more time we’ll finally accept it.

psvrh,
@psvrh@lemmy.ca avatar

We’re going to get fascism back purely because the neoliberal idea of fucking over everyone for the greater glory of the wealthy, while strip-mining brown people for every bit of value apparently has consequences.

Imagine how nice the world would be if we could have convinced the wealthy to make do with less?

psvrh,
@psvrh@lemmy.ca avatar

Remember the red line on Russia with regard to the first invasion of Crimea? Or Syria even earlier?

Obama, and now Biden, actually embolden autocrata with spineless moves like these. Netanyahu’s going to keep pushing because, line a toddler, he’s not sure where the actual “red line” really is.

psvrh,
@psvrh@lemmy.ca avatar

Oh no, not the capital investment! Anything but that!

For the record, the oil industry’s global profits were $4T. Not revenue, profit. $75B in investment sounds like a lot, until you realize all it means is that they’ll need to dig into that $4T to fund stuff, and that $75B is less than two percent of $4T, and the actual hit to revenue and income will be even less.

They can cut back on avocado toast, as it were.

psvrh,
@psvrh@lemmy.ca avatar

I mean, other than Exxon, Shell or BP.

And the Knesset.

And Putin.

But other than that!

psvrh,
@psvrh@lemmy.ca avatar

Ah, so you’ve seen the Liberal handbook too?

(The Conservative one is similar, only they spend the money to get a Big Four accounting firm to do an audit to tell them there’s no fat to trim need to invest more)

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • JUstTest
  • kavyap
  • DreamBathrooms
  • ngwrru68w68
  • Durango
  • mdbf
  • magazineikmin
  • everett
  • thenastyranch
  • rosin
  • Youngstown
  • slotface
  • khanakhh
  • osvaldo12
  • megavids
  • GTA5RPClips
  • tacticalgear
  • cubers
  • modclub
  • tester
  • InstantRegret
  • ethstaker
  • cisconetworking
  • anitta
  • provamag3
  • Leos
  • normalnudes
  • lostlight
  • All magazines