Cinner

@Cinner@kbin.social
Cinner,

Hmm, haven't heard of that distribution before.

Cinner,

How do bidets work with different types of poop? My butt has been on a real peanut butter kick lately, and I'm starting to despise wet wipes.

Cinner,

I mean, are we talking green or black john oliver's?

Cinner,

EDIT: replied to the wrong comment and server 500's on deletion.

Lemmy is not a company offering services, and doesn't store personally identifiable information besides IP address, so whether it even falls under GDPR is questionable.

Here is a GDPR discussion about Mastodon: https://github.com/mastodon/mastodon/issues/7280

Cinner,

Though what if lemmy ever ran into the same trouble of getting hit by gdpr

Lemmy is not a company offering services, and doesn't store personally identifiable information besides IP address, so whether it even falls under GDPR is questionable.

Here is a GDPR discussion about Mastodon: https://github.com/mastodon/mastodon/issues/7280

Cinner,

No.

Fingerprinting is against the goals of Lemmy and privacy. Lemmy should be for the good of people.

If anything there should be SOME centralization that allows other (known, somehow verified) instances to vote to allow/disallow spammy instances. In some way that couldn't be abused. This may lead to a fork down the road (think BTC vs BCH) due to community disagreements but I don't really see any other way this doesn't become an absolute spamfest. As it stands now one server admin could spamfest their own server with their own spam, and once it starts federating EVERYONE gets flooded. This also easily creates a DoS of the system.

Asking instance admins to require CAPTCHA or whatever to defeat spam doesn't work when the instance admins are the ones creating spam servers to spam the federation.

Cinner,

Reposting this in comment from a reply elsewhere in the thread.

If anything there should be SOME centralization that allows other (known, somehow verified) instances to vote to disallow spammy instances from federating. In some way that couldn't be abused. This may lead to a fork down the road (think BTC vs BCH) due to community disagreements but I don't really see any other way this doesn't become an absolute spamfest. As it stands now one server admin could spamfest their own server with their own spam, and once it starts federating EVERYONE gets flooded. This also easily creates a DoS of the system.

Asking instance admins to require CAPTCHA or whatever to defeat spam doesn't work when the instance admins are the ones creating spam servers to spam the federation.

Cinner,

If a spam instance created 1m posts before coming online, and it creates a massive flood as soon as it federates, does the good instance blocking it also remove all federated comments and posts from that instance?

Cinner,

I used to pirate games and software. Then came the ransomware, and the crypto stealers.

So I'm afraid of pirating certain things, but not because of the IP issues.

Cinner,

qBittorrent is what I've been using since uTorrent went to shit. Well there was a brief period where I used Transmission but it's so feature-limited.

Cinner,

If you don't understand why he's doing it then you've never done anything of value w/r/t community projects and your opinion belongs in the toxic wasteland with all the others.

Cinner,

Is Jerboa affected? Maybe try clicking on OPs link? I doubt you can navigate directly to a URL within an app but I don't use it so I may may be wrong.

Cinner,

The guy is trolling people. That's not how any of the LLMs write, AND what they do say when presented with a prompt of questionable ethics is "as an AI language model" not "as an AI language program."

No service uses the word program in that prompt response.

It shouldn't need to be said but people are daft so I'll say it anyway: I support the protests, hope reddit dies, and fuck spez.

But this isn't an AI bot.

Cinner,

I can’t deny that I’ve formed or changed opinions in the past due to well written comments.

This is A Good Thing™

Changing your mind when presented with new, compelling information is something everyone should do, but it's something far too few actually practice.

Cinner,

I wouldn't expect him to lol. Every time I watch one of his videos, I'm reminded of one of The Onion News Network's greatest creations: The Autistic Reporter.

Note: Whether Rossman is on the spectrum (I assume so) I'm not throwing shade at all. He's a powerhouse.

Cinner,

I'm not sure what you're getting at but he's right, it's incredibly simple to setup a new redirect site.

Is there a better way to hide NSFW content on all/active than checking the "hide adult content" box?

I've checked the box but now that it's blocking properly marked porn, my /active feed is being inundated with what feels like a hundred different "furry" communities and magazines. I'm blocking them as they come up because I'm not into that shit at all but is there an additional filter I can add or is that maybe something that...

Cinner,

Plugging my NSF(W/L) system from the other day in case anyone wants to add to it or do something with it.

https://kbin.social/m/kbinMeta/t/52668/-/comment/226082

Cinner,

I hate Elon as a person as much as the next guy, but I'm sad to see Lemmy users with the same inability for emotional override as the average redditor. How this has downvotes is beyond me.

OC I created a site that helps people search the fediverse (programmer2514.github.io)

I had been having trouble getting meaningful results from the fediverse on Google, and after seeing this post, it seems I'm not the only one. So, I created a site that helps search the fediverse in your search engine of choice (it currently supports Google, Bing, Yahoo, DuckDuckGo, and Dogpile)....

We need to be able to differentiate between NSFW and porn.

A boob, a butt, or even some violence like one might see on the news anyway, I’m not freaked out about all that and I don’t feel the need to hide it from those around me usually… that’s all fine fine, but I don’t want porn on my feed like at all....

Cinner, (edited )

There needs to be a levels system instead of a letters system.


NSF(W)1: you wouldn't look at it in front of your boss in a corporate setting. Anything slightly risque in nature.

NSF(W)2: Written graphic text

NSF(W)3: Maybe a nip slip, or an African tribeswoman in native dress

NSF(W)4: Some intermediary step here

NSF(W)5: Nudes, porn, etc.


NSF(L)1: Fight footage with mild-medium violence

NSF(L)2: Death

NSF(L)3: Graphic death. Gore. Beheadings. Etc.


They don't even need to be in order, but there should be a classification system. Once the classification system is implemented, we can set classifications to view/not view in our settings.

Cinner,

I was using Joey but deleted it along with my accounts on the 12th.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • JUstTest
  • khanakhh
  • kavyap
  • thenastyranch
  • everett
  • tacticalgear
  • rosin
  • Durango
  • DreamBathrooms
  • mdbf
  • magazineikmin
  • InstantRegret
  • Youngstown
  • slotface
  • anitta
  • ethstaker
  • ngwrru68w68
  • cisconetworking
  • modclub
  • normalnudes
  • osvaldo12
  • cubers
  • GTA5RPClips
  • Leos
  • tester
  • megavids
  • provamag3
  • lostlight
  • All magazines