Science

stefan,
@stefan@stefanbohacek.online avatar

"In 1912, Oskar von Miller, an electrical engineer and founder of the Deutsches Museum, had an idea: Could you project an artificial starry sky onto a dome, as a way of demonstrating astronomical principles to the public?"

https://spectrum.ieee.org/planetarium-history

stefan,
@stefan@stefanbohacek.online avatar

@jonobie Interesting, I was surprised they've been around this long!

(And I know very little about the topic, that's perhaps why.)

jonobie,
@jonobie@social.coop avatar

@stefan I have no idea why, but I’d pegged them as something from the 1800s. They’re still one of my favorite places in a science museum to go-so magical! 🤩

NicoleCRust,
@NicoleCRust@neuromatch.social avatar

When should one call themselves an X researcher?

There are so many different types of researchers. Weather researchers, climate researchers, brain researchers. And within those categories, the nuances (like memory researchers).

When someone says they are an X researcher, what does that imply to you? In other words, what qualifies? Does it just imply that they are curious about X? Or perhaps that they know a bit more about it - perhaps they've mastered some scholarly literature or they've done at least one experiment? Or maybe even published a paper in a peer reviewed journal? Or maybe even more - perhaps they have a body of work on the topic; maybe they even run a lab (and have grants to support X research).

On one hand, no one should gate keep curiosity! On the other, certain terms imply knowledge and qualifications. I'm a "researcher". But just because I know a lot about memory doesn't automatically mean that people should listen to me about climate or economics. And I once read a very good book about ecosystems, but I don't think that means I should quality as an ecosystem researcher. So what, then, might instead?

benjamingeer,
@benjamingeer@zirk.us avatar

@vicgrinberg I'm just saying that if you only count people who have already had a major impact in their field as researchers, you're excluding a lot of early-career researchers. Publications are hard to evaluate if they're not in your field. We all know that rubbish sometimes gets published in peer reviewed journals. In practice, we tend to look at the reputation of the institution or department that the person is working in.

vicgrinberg,
@vicgrinberg@mastodon.social avatar

@benjamingeer I am and this is fine! They are early career researchers. Been one of them until few years ago myself.

PBruce,
@PBruce@mastodon.social avatar

Court upholds B.C.'s COVID-19 health-care vaccine mandate

Province continues to maintain vaccine requirement for health-care workers

around 1,800 workers lost their jobs for being unvaccinated

The Judge found the provincial health officer's mandates were reasonable in light of

scientific evidence at the time.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/covid-19-vaccine-mandate-bc-1.7205763

gutenberg_org,
@gutenberg_org@mastodon.social avatar

in 1888.

Nikola Tesla delivers a lecture describing the equipment which will allow efficient generation and use of alternating currents to transmit electric power over long distances.

Experiments with alternate currents of very high frequency and their application to methods of artificial illumination. By Nikola Tesla

https://teslasciencecenter.org/announcements/experiments-with-alternate-currents-of-very-high-frequency-and-their-application-to-methods-of-artificial-illumination-by-nikola-tesla/

ManyRoads,
@ManyRoads@mstdn.social avatar

"Every Awful Thing Trump Has Promised to Do in a Second Term
The former president has pushed a slew of terrifying proposals, both publicly and privately, that he plans to unleash on America should he take down Biden"

#Extinction #MAGA #GOP #FossilFuel #Republicans #AntiScience #AntiEarth #Science #News #ClimateChange #Environment #Democrats #2024Election #Oil

https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/trump-second-term-plans-wildest-proposals-1234947327/

ScienceDesk,
@ScienceDesk@flipboard.social avatar

More than five million people are bitten by snakes every year, resulting in thousands of deaths and permanent disabilities. Those chilling statistics didn’t stop one PhD student, João Miguel Alves-Nunes, from stepping on deadly and dangerous vipers more than 40,000 times. Alven-Nunes tells Science about putting himself in danger for a scientific experiment, what happened when one snake’s fangs broke through his protective boot, and why even that harrowing experience won’t diminish his love for "working with these animals." https://flip.it/zRaVCF

Wuzzy,
@Wuzzy@cyberplace.social avatar

As long society accepts genital "surgeries" on babies so they conform to some bullshit norms, we cannot call ourselves enlightened.

https://www.hrw.org/report/2017/07/25/i-want-be-nature-made-me/medically-unnecessary-surgeries-intersex-children-us

"Two common goals of these cosmetic 'normalizing' surgeries on children’s genitals are to enable penetrative intercourse, and to help the child to and sexual norms"

It's based on , not .
It MUST be condemned like <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Female_genital_mutilation>.

ttpphd,
@ttpphd@mastodon.social avatar

@Wuzzy all forms of nonconsensual genital cutting should be banned, including penile circumcision and medically unnecessary intersex surgeries. Right on.

tness, French

Reprogrammer les cellules immunitaires : la révolution des cellules CAR-T contre le cancer

C’est une avancée importante pour la lutte contre certain . Dans ce billet Sciences, on vous parle de la révolution des cellules CAR-T, qui sont au cœur d’une stratégie d’immunothérapie cellulaire en plein développement visant à combattre le cancer en s’appuyant sur le propre système du patient.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QnsM2dGpqAs

CAR-T
Reprogrammer les cellules immunitaires : la révolution des cellules CAR-T contre le cancer

ScienceDesk,
@ScienceDesk@flipboard.social avatar

For the fifth time in three years, a group of orcas has sunk a ship in southwest Europe. This time an unknown number of killer whales attacked a 50-foot sailing yacht in the Strait of Gibraltar, ripped open its hull and sent the boat to the seafloor. Live Science has more, including what happened to the crew and why researchers believe the attacks are a learned behavior that could increase in the coming months. https://flip.it/0KoMeL
#Science #KillerWhales #Orcas #Europe

thepoliticalcat,
@thepoliticalcat@mastodon.social avatar

@ScienceDesk Only FIVE times in THREE YEARS? Geeze, you'd think it was a regular happening. Stop yachting there! It's their damn territory.

hankg,

Why we can't have nice things...We've known about paper mills and lack of sufficient reviewers being a problem for a while now. It's been getting worse and worse. That's before we start seeing the expected massive increase from ChatGPT-style word vomiter crap. "Flood of Fake Science Forces Multiple Journal Closures" msn.com/en-us/money/markets/fl…

mjromano,
@mjromano@woof.group avatar

@hankg peer review matters!!

setiinstitute,
@setiinstitute@mastodon.social avatar

#PPOD: As carbon dioxide frost sublimates with the warming Martian spring, a pattern emerges of dark brown sand dunes interspersed with the remaining bright frost. Image taken by the HiRISE camera onboard NASA's Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter. Credit: NASA / JPL-Caltech / University of Arizona

#mars #science #space #scicomm

DrMLHarris,
@DrMLHarris@mastodon.social avatar

A survey of more than 3000 physical science researchers in over 100 countries reveals a sharp split in attitudes towards the use of AI in peer review, with 35% saying it will be harmful, 29% saying it will be beneficial, and 36% predicting it will have no impact.

https://physicsworld.com/a/researchers-split-on-merits-and-pitfalls-of-ai-in-peer-review-iop-publishing-survey-finds/

J_Exp_Biol,
@J_Exp_Biol@biologists.social avatar

Ever wonder how soft bodied creatures exert forces as they move? Now a new theory by @mchtweet & co reveals how starfish feet propel the echinoderms, how worms burrow & how squid propel their tentacles.

https://journals.biologists.com/jeb/article/227/9/jeb247936/347309

Read the full research: https://journals.biologists.com/jeb/article/227/9/jeb246901/347310

gutenberg_org,
@gutenberg_org@mastodon.social avatar

in 1618.

Johannes Kepler confirms his previously rejected discovery of the third law of planetary motion (he first discovered it on March 8 but soon rejected the idea after some initial calculations were made).

The elliptical orbits of planets were indicated by calculations of the orbit of Mars. The third law expresses that the farther a planet is from the Sun, the slower its orbital speed, and vice versa.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kepler%27s_laws_of_planetary_motion

avlcharlie,
@avlcharlie@mastodon.social avatar

@gutenberg_org
The other weird law that he found was that planets sweep the same area for time. If you take the elliptical path over time and create a pie shaped wedge from the focal point, no matter how distant or how close, the area of the pie shape will be the same in the same amount of time. Weird but true.

glynmoody,
@glynmoody@mastodon.social avatar

Earth-sized planet spotted orbiting small star with 100 times sun’s lifespan - https://www.theguardian.com/science/article/2024/may/15/earth-sized-planet-speculoos-3b-spotted-orbiting-ultra-cool-red-dwarf "Speculoos-3b, 55 light years away, is only second planetary system to be found around an ultra-cool red dwarf"

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • science
  • ngwrru68w68
  • rosin
  • modclub
  • Youngstown
  • khanakhh
  • Durango
  • slotface
  • mdbf
  • cubers
  • GTA5RPClips
  • kavyap
  • DreamBathrooms
  • InstantRegret
  • magazineikmin
  • megavids
  • osvaldo12
  • tester
  • tacticalgear
  • ethstaker
  • Leos
  • thenastyranch
  • everett
  • normalnudes
  • anitta
  • provamag3
  • cisconetworking
  • JUstTest
  • lostlight
  • All magazines