anselmschueler,
@anselmschueler@ieji.de avatar

@glaskows As I understand it: int * is the type of x_ptr, but int is the type of *x_ptr. The declaration, syntactically, is not the type int * juxtaposed with x_ptr, but the type int juxtaposed with the declarator *x_ptr. This is most clearly demonstrated by multiple declarations with one type: int *a, b means a is a pointer, b isn’t. The type int * is an independent construction formed by omitting the identifier from the declarator.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • programming
  • DreamBathrooms
  • mdbf
  • ngwrru68w68
  • magazineikmin
  • thenastyranch
  • rosin
  • khanakhh
  • osvaldo12
  • Youngstown
  • slotface
  • Durango
  • kavyap
  • InstantRegret
  • tacticalgear
  • anitta
  • ethstaker
  • provamag3
  • cisconetworking
  • tester
  • GTA5RPClips
  • cubers
  • everett
  • modclub
  • megavids
  • normalnudes
  • Leos
  • JUstTest
  • lostlight
  • All magazines