OC Updated: Reddit is quietly restoring deleted AND overwritten posts and comments

Another update and possibly a solution for some case where posts were not properly deleted. Seems I jumped the gun on this and the restores haven't been intentional - at least not in this particular case.

There is a limitation in the popular Powerdelete that apparently prevents mass editing. Here is a link to a new version with a build-in delay and some other alternatives:
https://www.reddit.com/r/ModCoord/comments/145fico/comment/jnl4xmr/

There are other reported cases where manually deleted post reappeared or other scripts have been used, so this doesn't solve all issues but explains how posts that were both edited and deleted withPowerdelete weren't properly deleted and reappeared after subs went back live.

Update: As some have pointed out: the restores can be rollbacks from the server issues or post haven't been properly deleted due to subs being private during blackouts. Many have experienced the same issue, I can't explain how this happens. I'll just run the script again, try the GDPR request and delete my account.

Also worth noting: according to the ToS Reddit can actually do whatever they want with existing content, apparently we agreed to this when signing up.

!deleted125603,

deleted_by_author

    •
    Brkdncr,

    In the US, indicate that you’re in California for the strongest legal option.

    tal,
    tal avatar

    Assuming that this is, in fact, not legal and if they have money that can be gone after, I assume that someone may start a class action suit. In theory, they're worth multiple billions, so...

    An individual probably doesn't care much about whatever harm is done, as the damage is too small. But this is the kind of thing where a lawyer can walk away with a big payday by aggregating cases of many users and then getting a percentage of any payout.

    I am not at all certain that it is not legal, though.

    overzeetop,
    @overzeetop@lemmy.world avatar

    undefined> In theory, they’re worth multiple billions, so…

    wen Lambo?

    NecoArcKbinAccount,
    NecoArcKbinAccount avatar

    wait if the account is deleted can they still restore the comments?

    dan,
    @dan@upvote.au avatar

    When an account is deleted, all the comments still exist, the author's name just changes to "[deleted]". You'd need to use a third-party tool that deletes all the comments individually, or potentially send them a GDPR or CCPA "right to be forgotten" request (although I'm unsure as to if this actually deletes the comments).

    entropie,

    https://www.unddit.com/

    Not sure if still possible, but this was a way to show deleted reddit comments

    dan,
    @dan@upvote.au avatar

    Sites like this will likely die off once they make the API cost money, since they all work by calling the API and getting a list of all the newest comments.

    NecoArcKbinAccount,
    NecoArcKbinAccount avatar

    I had done that, but now I'm concerned they'll somehow pull the comments up even though the account is removed

    balance_sheet,

    That's why before you purge your account, you rewrite(edit) the comments with something like Lorem Ipsum.

    OmnipotentEntity,
    @OmnipotentEntity@beehaw.org avatar

    In practice, it's hard to know exactly how Reddit structures the data they have and what exactly a delete actually does and what backups they have.

    That being said, it's not out of the question that you could delete your post history, then your account, and reddit only restores your post history and not your account, leaving you unable to delete it again.

    TWeaK,

    Hijacking the top comment to say: PowerDeleteSuite doesn't get everything. It can only see what's in your reddit profile under New, Top, Hot & Controversial - there will be numerous posts that are too old with only 1 or a few karma that aren't displayed in these lists. In particular, if you go through your top posts of all time, you might find some replies to these posts that you made that the script did not see.

    The GDPR archive gives a full list of all the comments. What we need is a FOSS script that can use these csv files to get everything. Apparently Shreddit can take the csv files, however you have to pay $15 to use this feature.

    Jon-H558,

    I've already given $30 to kbin as a fuck you to Reddit what's $15 more

    ChiefestOfCalamities,

    I got rid of all my stuff with Reddit Enhancement Suite. Seemed to work well. Not the most user friendly method, but it's free and effective.

    https://www.guidingtech.com/how-to-delete-all-reddit-comments-posts/

    CtrlOpenAppleReset, (edited )

    This could be worse than anything else they've done. If they claim they own the data, are they then not responsible for it like newspapers? Is it in their terms and conditions they are free to do whatever with posted information, do they have the rights to edit users comments but in doing so become a content provider and therefore responsible. Kicking mods out doesn't land you in court this seems high risk to be manipulating content. Doesn't matter why it was deleted or edited it was deleted or edited who gets to decide what version to restore. Either you are hands off or you own the data and are responsible for it and upheld to media standards.

    Edit: found a snippit of the terms and conditions in a German GDPR thread, It appears it is their terms and conditions that after you post it they can do with it what they like, even adapt it. Either way that's not a reason to be gone.

    Lowbird,

    There was that kerfuffle ages ago about u/spez editing comments in r/thedonald, iirc. It's not like it would be that much of a stretch for him at least.

    But it looks like from OP's edits it may be unintentional. I'll withhold my rage for now.

    doublejay3000,

    I picked up a permanent ban, after 15 years for saying 'Go outside fatso' to someone who said I couldnt read. Not my proudest moment, but there you go.

    The reason I mention it, is that it adds a different dynamic if they are trying retain (and prevent me from editing) data which they hold about me. They might argue that doesn't extend to post where I've written "cats > dogs" - but anything where I've refered to where I live, whether I have kids, what my political views are, are all clearly personal details which they are not allowed to hold without retaining my consent.

    Clear contraventions on GDPR in EU.

    https://commission.europa.eu/law/law-topic/data-protection/eu-data-protection-rules_en

    pleasemakesense,
    @pleasemakesense@lemmy.world avatar

    ToS like that does often not mean anything, they can write whatever they like but it doesn't mean they can legally enforce it. So if you are an artist posting a painting you made, reddit can't just say 'oop, it's ours now' same with text

    Girlparts,
    Girlparts avatar

    I believe this is illegal for European (under GDPR).

    shanghaibebop,

    Only if the user files a delete request though.

    Phoeniqz,
    @Phoeniqz@lemmy.dbzer0.com avatar

    Using a platform run like an authoritarian regime feels nice, until it doesn't.

    starlinguk,
    starlinguk avatar

    So... They've basically just admitted that deleting your posts is bad for Reddit.

    Keep going, guys.

    And spezi (as we lovingly refer to you in our household), expect lawyers.

    Spezi,

    I don't want to be mixed up with spez :-(

    puck2,

    I deleted some of mine but we're taking 12++ years of posts

    omenmis,

    Spezi did nothing wrong, don't slander my favorite soda over some asshat

    doublejay3000,

    You can begin your complaint in the UK with the Information Commissioner's Office :

    https://ico.org.uk/make-a-complaint/data-protection-complaints/data-protection-complaints/

    admin,

    This is shitty of them to do but this is what people have been trying to tell us since the dawn of the internet. Nothing on the internet is EVER truly deleted

    reflex,
    reflex avatar

    Nothing on the internet is EVER truly deleted

    Barbara Streisand ♫

    Balssh,
    Balssh avatar

    I think they may underestimate EU's response here.

    jargoggles,

    While this is true, it's sort of like being in a car accident. The other person may be in the wrong, but that doesn't exactly unwreck your car.

    Celivalg,

    oh, but they might have to pay for your car back...

    And that's gonna pull reddit down even more

    Rayspekt,

    DSGVO take the wheel

    booshi, (edited )

    deleted_by_author

    •
    Bipta,

    Certainly some of it can be.

    procgen,

    That depends on the content of the post or comment, no?

    Nexclusive,

    Personal data is any information that relates to an individual who can be directly or indirectly identified. Names and email addresses are obviously personal data. Location information, ethnicity, gender, biometric data, religious beliefs, web cookies, and political opinions can also be personal data. Pseudonymous data can also fall under the definition if it’s relatively easy to ID someone from it.

    For most people, GDPR probably applies to at least some of their comments on Reddit.

    abff08f4813c,
    abff08f4813c avatar

    Yes it is, as pointed out here https://kbin.social/m/RedditMigration/t/34112/Updated-Reddit-is-quietly-restoring-deleted-AND-overwritten-posts-and#entry-comment-140833 and here https://kbin.social/m/RedditMigration/t/34112/Updated-Reddit-is-quietly-restoring-deleted-AND-overwritten-posts-and#entry-comment-141285

    booshi,

    These links are just going to the same post we are on? It's not linking to specific comments for me.

    abff08f4813c,
    abff08f4813c avatar

    Looks like comment link redirection isn't quite working. Let me just copy over the comment text for now:

    Well, people have reported Twitter for failing to remove their tweets and places like the ICO are now actively investigating Twitter over this failure, see https://www.wired.co.uk/article/delete-twitter-dms-gdpr

    Someone posted not too long ago that a person who was part of Twitter’s group over the GDPR - pre Musk - said the lawyers came to the conclusion that tweets were protected under the GDPR.

    I believe it's less straightforward than that. Under GDPR, consent can be withdrawn, you can't give an irrevokable consent.

    And from https://mstdn.games/@chris/110553477682106144

    Presumably falls under right to erasure (art 17,19 of GDPR). You've withdrawn your consent, so if it isn't exempt under legal obligation, public health, scientific research etc then that's it, really. I guess there might be brave souls who argue that posts on Reddit sometimes don't qualify as or contain personal data, but that would seem irrelevant unless someone is painstakingly anonymising the dataset on a case by case basis, which they surely aren't.

    Also, it looks like Twitter may be in some trouble, for failing to delete DMs under the GDPR, see https://techcrunch.com/2023/02/08/elon-musk-twitter-dm-deletion/

    Surely, if twitter DMs fall under the GDPR, so do Reddit posts and comments (and note that it's the content of the DMs, and not the personal identifiers, and that the DMs are requested to be deleted from e.g. receipients inboxes as well).

    booshi,

    There is nothing of fact here - as I said in my comments before and I'll say again - it's a case-by-case basis, but as it stands, this is not covered under GDPR. Everything you linked to is pending actual decisions, as this area of GDPR is still being figured out. Yet, for some reason, people are stating it as fact.

    abff08f4813c,
    abff08f4813c avatar

    as this area of GDPR is still being figured out.

    Interesting. So does that mean you think it COULD be covered by the GDPR, perhaps from a court decision at a future date? That at least it's a possibility, even if unknown right now?

    this is not covered under GDPR

    Interesting contradiction. I'd say there only three states: it is covered, it is not covered, and it's unknown.

    Anyways, here’s a fact:

    UK’s Information Commissioner’s Office … told Veale that Twitter’s response “failed to comply with the requirement of the data protection legislation”

    Of course you’d be right if you said it hasn’t been taken to court yet and that particular case lacks a court ruling to back it up. So if that’s your requirement for it to count, then that’s fair. Still, I would generally go with the guidance from the ICO here rather than try my luck in court, absent compelling reasons.

    I think the case by case thing is addressed somewhat from the Mastodon post. Someone reposting a meme wouldn’t contain any personal info to erase under GDPR, but another post that’s an ask me anything with a person’s picture and other verifiable credentials would be. In the latter case I’m not sure you could anonymize the content without making it unuseful and uninteresting.

    And it would take a lot of time and effort to review every post and comment and perform the anonymization. And deanonymization is a legitimate concern too. So I guess Reddit could try to play hardball here but it would probably cost them.

    booshi,

    lol what - just because a government entity says something, doesn't mean it's fact. You're grasping at straws and undermining actual fights for data privacy.

    abff08f4813c,
    abff08f4813c avatar

    and undermining actual fights for data privacy.

    Care to elaborate? Let's assume for the sake of argument that I actually am wrong and mistaken on this point. How does one get from "being mistaken" to "undermining" ? As a major supporter of data privacy, I'd really like to know this.

    lol what - just because a government entity says something, doesn't mean it's fact.

    I think I already addressed this earlier when I wrote,

    So if that’s your requirement for it to count, then that’s fair.

    Even so, the fact that multiple gov't entities charged with enforcing the GDPR seem to have come to the conclusion that failure to delete DMs is a violation of the GDPR is quite telling.

    Perhaps they are wrong, and perhaps we won't know for sure until this makes it to the Court of Justice of the European Union / Supreme Court of the United Kingdom for the definitive ruling. It's true that gov't agencies do get it wrong from time to time.

    Even so, I think that would be a tough and expensive fight that would give most folks pause. Both potentially illegal and against public opinion?

    Perhaps it's possible you misunderstood me. The fact I was pointing out was that the ICO thought Twitter had a potential GDPR violation. But I can agree that it's not confirmed until the relevant courts rule on it - the fact is simply that this is what the ICO has said.

    You're grasping at straws

    Hmm. So I've cited lots of things to explain why it looks like it's a likely GDPR violation. Can you cite for the opposite - why private DMs and Reddit posts (particularly text body contents) would not ever count?

    To sum it up, I find it really interesting how you've not responded to the first question I had in the parent comment:

    as this area of GDPR is still being figured out.
    Interesting. So does that mean you think it COULD be covered by the GDPR, perhaps from a court decision at a future date? That at least it's a possibility, even if unknown right now?

    I get the impression that you're a hard no here, that you assume once this area of the GDPR is figured out, then it most definitely won't be covered. But, care to elaborate why you think this is the likely outcome?

    abff08f4813c,
    abff08f4813c avatar

    Yes it is, as pointed out here https://kbin.social/m/RedditMigration/t/34112/Updated-Reddit-is-quietly-restoring-deleted-AND-overwritten-posts-and#entry-comment-140833 and here https://kbin.social/m/RedditMigration/t/34112/Updated-Reddit-is-quietly-restoring-deleted-AND-overwritten-posts-and#entry-comment-141285

    And also see https://kbin.social/m/reddit@lemmy.ml/t/34167/Reddit-is-restoring-deleted-posts#entry-comment-141186

    aceca, (edited )

    If a user is commenting they have an online identifier and are thus covered. If a user has ever referenced their relationship status, location or any physical descriptor they are covered. The GDPR -- it applies.

    booshi,

    That's not what an "online identifier" is under GDPR. Those are RFID tags, cookies, device fingerprints, IP addresses, etc: https://gdpr-info.eu/recitals/no-30/

    aceca,

    Usernames are online identifiers:

    https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/uk-gdpr-guidance-and-resources/personal-information-what-is-it/what-is-personal-data/what-are-identifiers-and-related-factors/

    A non-exhaustive list is included in Recital 30

    An individual’s social media ‘handle’ or username, which may seem anonymous or nonsensical, is still sufficient to identify them as it uniquely identifies that individual. The username is personal data if it distinguishes one individual from another regardless of whether it is possible to link the ‘online’ identity with a ‘real world’ named individual.

    Risk,

    It's not personal or identifiable we can just sell it to advertiser's to precisely target your exact person with things we think you might buy.

    flypenguin,

    please don't state things if you don't know what you're talking about. it absolutely applies. it's a personalized account, with a personalized email address – this is the core of GDPR. it might not apply cause reddit is not within the legislation of the EU. maybe.

    Jon-H558,

    If they have eu users they have to apply it. That is why many places have ip lock outs that just prevent us from.seeing it.

    However if they truly anonymise the content of a post they can keep it

    pleasemakesense,
    @pleasemakesense@lemmy.world avatar

    Doesn't matter, they'll be fined and if they refuse to pay they'll not be allowed to operate in the EU

    booshi,

    Can't be fined for GDPR if you aren't violating GDPR taps temple

    booshi,

    I do - I work with this daily. It would be a massive uphill battle to even prove in a court that your whole post history is considered "identifying". It's a case-by-base basis. On top of that, your data could still be easily stored and simply no longer associated with your email (but still can be kept if the previous cannot be proven about identification). Then this would have to be tested, on a that same case-by-case basis, for every single user that made a request.

    To quote yourself, "please don't state things if you don't know what you're talking about."

    flypenguin,

    ah ... simply no. also now you're going into technicalities and specific scenarios – which might make sense in court, yet doesn't disprove the principle per se. but maybe let's agree to disagree, i don't think this goes somewhere.

    Sleepy_ducky,
    Sleepy_ducky avatar

    Have a read through. It definitely relates to GDPR (and even the Right to be Forgotten). Those are our accounts, linked to our emails. It is content we generate (even Reddit admits the content is owned by the creator). So if I want to delete everything and leave no trace I should be able to.

    https://www.cyberghostvpn.com/en_US/privacyhub/how-to-delete-reddit-account/

    booshi,

    Those are our accounts, linked to our emails, which they are free to de-associate, and freely use for whatever commercial purposes they want.

    BorgDrone,

    That's debatable. Sure. my account doesn't actually contain my name and address, but it contains almost 14 years of posts and comments. Through the years I've probably let slip enough small pieces of information about myself that a motivated person would be able to identify me. This would still make it identifiable information.

    Legisign,
    Legisign avatar

    Sure. my account doesn't actually contain my name and address, but it contains almost 14 years of posts and comments.

    Agreed. If a person’s speaking voice falls under the GDPR (as I have found out being a phonetician and hence doing research on it), surely opinions and comments taken not individually but as a cumulated mass must do so too.

    booshi,

    Debatable? Yes, as that still hasn't been figured out at a higher level, and this is still handled on a case-by-case basis. Otherwise, they are free to keep your data, and simply no longer keep the association with your email.

    aceca,

    The data subjects are identifiable if they can be directly or indirectly identified, especially by reference to an identifier such as a name, an identification number, location data, an online identifier or one of several special characteristics

    By definition commenting reddit users are covered, even if they haven't posted anything otherwise identifying -- but most have either way.

    booshi,

    That's not what an "online identifier" is under GDPR. Those are RFID tags, cookies, device fingerprints, IP addresses, etc: https://gdpr-info.eu/recitals/no-30/

    nickajeglin,

    *Looks up GDPR... "EU law"

    Womp womp :(

    booshi,

    There is also CCPA in California - but none of these offer a total blanket/shield of protection like people are positing here. It's still a completely grey area that has, so far, not sided with users of sites.

    Mineroboter,

    deleted_by_author

    •
    Jon-H558,

    Yes but if they take the user name off can they keep the comment text up. For most comments they probably could unless you were putting your name or your job title and company or similar in the body of the text.

    booshi,

    Do you understand how trivial it is to anonymize the data so it can still be used and monetized?

    aceca,

    How exactly do you trivially remove all references to the physical, physiological, genetic, mental, economic, cultural or social identity of the person posting?

    This is the bar you'd have to clear to ensure someone's comment history were anonymized per GDPR, miss a single one of these factors and your anonymous data is now reversible and thus infringing.

    abff08f4813c,
    abff08f4813c avatar

    Also worth noting: according to the ToS Reddit can actually do whatever they want with existing content, apparently we agreed to this when signing up.

    Been thinking about that. I don't think that overrules laws like the GDPR though - law triumphs over ToS. And under GDPR, consent can be withdrawn, you can't give an irrevokable consent.

    PixxlMan,

    Totally. When quitting, make sure to file a GDPR takedown request on your account. If reddit doesn't comply, they could be fined quite handsomely.

    booshi,

    So they will delete your email address, and still freely use your content for whatever uses. Oh no!

    Azzu,

    That's not how it works. All content has to be deleted for GDPR compliance.

    Screak42,

    yes and no. unfortunately it’s in many cases not overly difficult for a company to justify the still need this data after sich request. but it’s something at least

    https://gdpr.eu/right-to-be-forgotten/#:~:text=In%20Article%2017%2C%20the%20GDPR,originally%20collected%20or%20processed%20it.

    TWeaK,

    GDPR gives you the right to correct information if it's wrong. Given that the information is typically an opinion of the user, that should give the user the right to remove the information.

    SphereofWreckening,

    IANAL but wouldn't this be on par with creating a contract or NDA with illegal elements? Wherein the contract/NDA are no longer considered valid/become void as a result. Obviously this wouldn't apply to the US and several other countries, and Reddit also has lawyers. Realistically I'm also just some dingus so someone smarter may know

    abff08f4813c,
    abff08f4813c avatar

    It's probably the case that the rest of the ToS applies except for that one specific element, which is severable. This what I've usually read in contracts (IANAL either but I used to work in a business that required a lot of proofing of contracts).

    TWeaK,

    You should bear in mind, PowerDeleteSuite doesn't get everything. It can only see what's in your reddit profile under New, Top, Hot & Controversial - there will be numerous posts that are too old with only 1 or a few karma that aren't displayed in these lists. In particular, if you go through your top posts of all time, you might find some replies to these posts that you made that the script did not see.

    The GDPR archive gives a full list of all the comments. What we need is a FOSS script that can use these csv files to get everything. Apparently Shreddit can take the csv files, however you have to pay $15 to use this feature.

    rarkgrames,
    @rarkgrames@lemmy.world avatar

    I mass edited my posts to all say fuck /u/spez with redact and most appear to be back. I shall edit them again and if they come back I shall do it again and again. I can play this game as long as it takes.

    forgotmylastusername,

    All posts/comments from shadow banned accounts show as [removed]. Just putting that out there.

    someguy3,

    While there's some value in old threads, the real value is in new ones. Deleting old comments won't amount to much.

    parrot-party,
    parrot-party avatar

    I regularly find old threads when Google searching. There is absolutely value in old comments.

    namastex,
    namastex avatar

    💯

    Most people who use reddit or have used reddit tend to Google everything by putting "Reddit" somewhere in their searches now.

    overzeetop,
    @overzeetop@lemmy.world avatar

    I'd be willing to bet a lot of traffic is driven to Reddit via Google queries (Lord knows that Reddit's own search engine can't find shit). Removing data will reduce hits or, if Google doesn't update their cached database, will result in people avoiding reddit because every time they go there it's just deleted comments.

    someguy3,

    I think most (not all) is the normal lurkers browsing all.

    lusterko,

    I only started using reddit because I was finding lots of useful old threads through Google/ddg

    SterlingVapor,

    Here's the thing - everything rots. Code and data included.

    Not participating is more than enough - better that the data is preserved anyways. Restoring it is ice chips to a starving man, it'll help, but not for long

    Anahkiasen,
    @Anahkiasen@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

    That is such a shitty move. Forcing subreddits to go back up is one thing, but as a european this feels very wrong from a data ownership standpoint and I'm not sure it's ok in the GDPR rules?

    glitch,
    @glitch@pl.glitch.pm avatar

    @Anahkiasen @chri5 almost certainly no bueno under GDPR.

    Post content being deemed PII at user digression is already a... questionable stance to take with GDPR but probably grey enough to the point where a DPA won't bother with it while they have bigger fish to fry.

    Outright going against user requested data removal tho? Yeah that's a good way to net you GDPR complaints. If the user requests their info removed, you're required to oblige unless you have a reason that amounts to something like "we need this to keep the service operational", which post content almost certainly isn't.

    (ie. You're not gonna be able to GDPR your IP address or email off of the banlist.)

    albatros,

    I'm not sure it's ok in the GDPR rules?

    That would probably be related to "right to erasure".

    But even this has limits, since sometimes the data can be necessary for a service (for example, you might be unable to get invoice data erased before X years, as a legal requirement)

    Since messages on forums can be considered "needed" to understand a thread, it's usually advised to make all messages anonymous if a user requests complete deletion.

    I guess here it's a little different, since the messages were removed by users, so it's not a gdpr request. Not sure how it works in that case.

    Other issue is if the messages themselves contain personal information... Someone going through my old reddit profile could probably figure out my identity since I mentioned one of my (very uncommon) previous job a few times.

    Best way to figure out how it works here would probably be to contact the gdpr authority for your country... And they might have trouble with it too.

    masterX244,
    masterX244 avatar

    But even this has limits, since sometimes the data can be necessary for a service (for example, you might be unable to get invoice data erased before X years, as a legal requirement)

    But then it still needs to be marked as a "DO NOT TOUCH". you aren't allowed to use it then for any other purpose.

    Celivalg,

    Since messages on forums can be considered “needed” to understand a thread, it’s usually advised to make all messages anonymous if a user requests complete deletion.

    We have seen [deleted] Comment deleted by user before, so that argument is gonna flop hard

    gkd,
    @gkd@lemmy.ml avatar

    What about some of the US likes like the ones in California and Virginia? Curious about that.

    Anon2971, (edited )
    Anon2971 avatar

    I think we should actively keep track of Reddit restoring user's content without people's permission. Screenshots, timestamps, everything. Monitor it all.

    Maybe if Reddit go ahead with their API change whilst treating their users like such disposable crap, we could reach out to the EU to inform them of Reddit's GDPR breaches. Maybe that'd lead to their new revenue from API charges disappearing into hefty EU fines.

    Update: Maybe there's going to be some loophole about actually having to use the data deletion request via Reddit's UI for there to be an actually GDPR breach though thinking about it. Going to ask around some Law friends for advise

    juergen_hubert,
    juergen_hubert avatar

    That's an excellent idea! EU regulations on the digital rights of users are not to be trifled with, and "the right to be forgotten" is a big one.

    megane_kun,
    @megane_kun@lemmy.world avatar

    Mightily envious of you guys over there.

    booshi,

    deleted_by_author

    •
    Celivalg,

    uhm... political opinion is explicitly considered personal data under GDPR...

    And, as another user pointed out here:

    Since the definition includes “any information,” one must assume that the term “personal data” should be as broadly interpreted as possible.

    So if political opinion is included, I let you consider what else also is.

    abff08f4813c,
    abff08f4813c avatar

    Yes, it does, and yes, there is, see https://kbin.social/m/reddit@lemmy.ml/t/34167/Reddit-is-restoring-deleted-posts#entry-comment-141186

    aceca, (edited )

    You're all over this thread saying this, what exactly do you think "right to erasure" means?

    From gdpr.info:

    Since the definition includes “any information,” one must assume that the term “personal data” should be as broadly interpreted as possible.

    Here's a short list of information thought not to be personal which has later been found personal:

    • Start end/times at work
    • Break times
    • Cultural id markers
    • Written answers to exam questions
    • Mental illness
    • Any physical descriptor
    • online identifiers (ie your reddit username which may be shared with other sites to identify you)
    • and plenty more

    The idea that redditors do not have personal information lingering in their comments is absurd, GDPR 100% applies.

    atzanteol,

    Doesn't seem like these were gdpr requests, just people marking posts as "deleted" which does not delete your post, it marks it as non-viewable.

    Make gdpr requests if you want your data deleted.

    Rairii,
    @Rairii@haqueers.com avatar

    @Anon2971 @chri5 @Anahkiasen i guess it depends if "just" editing/deleting the post/comment counts as "withdrawing consent" under GDPR?

    itsonlybrad,

    @Rairii what if you edit with a message stating that? Perhaps that could help but IANAL. Might be worthwhile consulting one and then lobbying tool writers to include it as the default.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • •
  • RedditMigration
  • rosin
  • InstantRegret
  • thenastyranch
  • magazineikmin
  • vwfavf
  • DreamBathrooms
  • cubers
  • Youngstown
  • slotface
  • PowerRangers
  • everett
  • ngwrru68w68
  • kavyap
  • mdbf
  • tester
  • Durango
  • hgfsjryuu7
  • osvaldo12
  • cisconetworking
  • ethstaker
  • khanakhh
  • tacticalgear
  • normalnudes
  • Leos
  • modclub
  • GTA5RPClips
  • anitta
  • provamag3
  • All magazines
    •