takvera,
@takvera@c.im avatar

Decarbonising long haul road freight: modelling lifecycle emissions of hydrogen and electric trucks

“Our modelling shows battery electric trucks will provide deep emission cuts of 75-85%, on average, across the fleet in the future decarbonised scenario. Hydrogen (fuel cell) trucks will provide large cuts of 50-70%, on average.


https://theconversation.com/why-electric-trucks-are-our-best-bet-to-cut-road-transport-emissions-219960

Hypx,
@Hypx@mastodon.social avatar

@takvera Other studies disagree. The problem is that there is no way of directly powering heavy trucks with renewable energy. That is because they cannot just sit there and wait for the sun or wind. It will have to be fast charging. This puts enormous limits on what kind of emission reductions that are possible. It is very likely that FCEVs will be much greener in practice.

https://truckingresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/ATRI-Environmental-Impacts-of-Zero-Emission-Trucks-Exec-Summary-5-2022.pdf

lil_meow_meow,
@lil_meow_meow@mastodon.social avatar

@takvera

The only sustainable way is green hydrogen, and the need for that in other areas is so great there won't be any molrculrs left for trucks or the stupidity that are e-fuels.

takvera,
@takvera@c.im avatar

@lil_meow_meow Agree. Green hydrogen will be needed fordecarbonising fertiliser production, petrochemical processes, shipping, perhaps industrial processes like green steel. Maybe some long term storage for grid balancing. Long haul trucking comes around middle of priorities. If you factor in building a hydrogen transport and refuelling infrastructure it adds cost and safety risk. See Liereich's Hydrogen Ladder version 5

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/hydrogen-ladder-version-50-michael-liebreich/

lil_meow_meow,
@lil_meow_meow@mastodon.social avatar

@takvera

Exactly! I'd add air travel too.

Steel is going green here in Europe, companies have sold already their "green steel batches" that won't be produced before IIRC 2025 and 2026.

takvera,
@takvera@c.im avatar

@lil_meow_meow
Yes, Long Haul aviation is very problematic. Short haul low to medium passenger number aviation may be met by battery electric... or take high speed train.

lil_meow_meow,
@lil_meow_meow@mastodon.social avatar

@takvera

I remember one of the European airline execs (could have been the Lufthansa guy, not sure) saying to the automotive and heating industry something to the effect of:
"Don't even think that you could run your products with green hydrogen because we, the aviation industry, will buy everything that'll be produced."

Hypx,
@Hypx@mastodon.social avatar

@lil_meow_meow @takvera He’s trapped in the fossil fuel mentality. There is basically infinite hydrogen available for transportation and industry purposes. It will never run out, and will can always scale up production to meet demand. It is all of the other ideas that will run out of supplies first.

lil_meow_meow,
@lil_meow_meow@mastodon.social avatar

@Hypx

That's wishful thinking to avoid saying that's untrue.

Please inform yourself of how much green energy you need to produce green hydrogen .

That's the severely, I repeat: severely limiting factor that won't be solved within the next many decades.

Bear in mind that we need green energy not just for the production of green hydrogen.

The climate crisis must be solved within the next 7-15 years to avoid worst cases, not in 2050, 2080 or 2100.

Hypx,
@Hypx@mastodon.social avatar

@lil_meow_meow Your argument is just a logical fallacy. For starters, you can scale up exponentially. It is not hard to get to arbitrarily high production levels.

And saying we need to solve it in 15 years is just absurd, doomsday cultist thinking. Not to mention there is no such solution that works in that timeframe.

lil_meow_meow,
@lil_meow_meow@mastodon.social avatar

@Hypx

Ignoring the real world certainly helps with spreading such megalomanias BS on steroids like you did.

I won't waste my time any longer and mute-block you.

Hypx,
@Hypx@mastodon.social avatar

@lil_meow_meow You have your own issues then. Anyone who goes around saying climate change needs to be solved in 7-15 years is a doomsday cultist. You have about as deep of a grasp of the science of climate change as a climate change denier.

takvera,
@takvera@c.im avatar

@lil_meow_meow @Hypx
scaling up capacity for green production is definitely a bottleneck.
Ahead of transport are addressing priority areas presently using Fossil based hydrogen with limited or no alternative options.

Useful to read IEA Renewables 2023 report (11 Jan 2024) on Renewable capacity for hydrogen. See pp 88-93.

https://iea.blob.core.windows.net/assets/96d66a8b-d502-476b-ba94-54ffda84cf72/Renewables_2023.pdf

Hypx,
@Hypx@mastodon.social avatar

@takvera @lil_meow_meow Everything is a bottleneck on some degree. But this is the most easily solved bottleneck. The other ideas will run into nearly insurmountable challenges if you try to avoid hydrogen altogether.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • climate
  • DreamBathrooms
  • mdbf
  • osvaldo12
  • magazineikmin
  • tacticalgear
  • rosin
  • thenastyranch
  • Youngstown
  • InstantRegret
  • slotface
  • everett
  • kavyap
  • Durango
  • khanakhh
  • provamag3
  • ethstaker
  • cubers
  • tester
  • modclub
  • ngwrru68w68
  • GTA5RPClips
  • cisconetworking
  • megavids
  • anitta
  • normalnudes
  • Leos
  • JUstTest
  • lostlight
  • All magazines