Nonilex,
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

Meet the arguing ’s ballot case

One is a familiar face at the Supreme Court & a fmr solicitor general. The other is appearing before the high court for the first time. Both have experience as to Supreme Court justices.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/02/07/lawyers-supreme-court-trump-ballot-case/

Nonilex,
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

Jonathan Mitchell, the TX , is representing on Thurs as he asks to toss a ruling from ’s high court disqualifying TFG from returning to the White House because of his actions before & during the , 2021, attack on the US Capitol.
Jason Murray, the lead for the Colorado behind the , is deeply familiar w/the record in the case after handling part of the argument before the CO Supreme Court.

Nonilex,
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

Murray’s Denver-based law firm, a small national firm w/a bench of experienced fmr SCOTUS law clerks, opened just 6 mos ago. The firm filed the lawsuit on behalf of the the next day.

Before joining the firm, Murray spent 11yrs as a . He was a clerk for Elena , a , at & for Justice Neil , a , during his tenure on the US Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit.

Nonilex,
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

In 2017, Murray wrote an opinion piece in support of ’s nomination of . He emphasized the similarities between his 2 fmr bosses despite their different . “Both Gorsuch& consistently emphasized to us clerks that, if we weren’t telling them when we thought their instincts on a case were wrong, we weren’t doing our jobs,”wrote Murray, a Harvard Law grad. “For both, the goal was to reach the correct result, rather than advance any party’s agenda.”

Nonilex,
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

’s lawyer on Thurs will be Mitchell, who was a clerk to Justice , the late Supreme Court . Mitchell will be standing…before …() for the 6th time & is scheduled to make his 7th trip later this month for a case, challenging a on (a stock for rapid ammo reloading — cuz apparently the thinks that’s something people need outside of war zones).

Nonilex,
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

Mitchell (’s atty) is perhaps best known as one of the architects of a novel that empowers private citizens (), rather than state officials, to enforce restrictions, by suing individuals who help obtain abortions after about 6 weeks into pregnancy. The law was specifically designed to evade pre-enforcement challenges in federal court (IOW to ).


Nonilex,
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

Mitchell, a UofC LawSchool grad & member of the , was a visiting prof at StanfordLaw when he suggested strategies in a review article for crafting legislation to withstand court challenges.
Legislature can “induce compliance w/its statutes by providing for private through lawsuits.These mechanisms are especially powerful because they enable private litigants to enforce a even after a fed dist court has enjoined the executive from enforcing it.”

Nonilex,
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

The controversial banned almost all starting at about 6 wks of pregnancy. allowed it to take effect months before the justices overturned v. Wade, drawing a dissent at the time from the court’s 3 liberal justices & Chief Justice John Roberts, who described the statute’s enforcement plan as “not only unusual, but unprecedented”
A 3rd , Solicitor Gen Shannon Stevenson, will split time w/Murray, representing the office of CO Secy of State Jena Griswold.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • legal
  • ngwrru68w68
  • rosin
  • GTA5RPClips
  • osvaldo12
  • love
  • Youngstown
  • slotface
  • khanakhh
  • everett
  • kavyap
  • mdbf
  • DreamBathrooms
  • thenastyranch
  • magazineikmin
  • megavids
  • InstantRegret
  • normalnudes
  • tacticalgear
  • cubers
  • ethstaker
  • modclub
  • cisconetworking
  • Durango
  • anitta
  • Leos
  • tester
  • provamag3
  • JUstTest
  • All magazines