beta_tester,

That’s the only world where apple is ahead 😂

BolexForSoup,
BolexForSoup avatar

I will say that in 2021 the M1 Mac mini was probably bang for buck the best computer you could get. Granted, that was mostly because GPUs were insanely expensive/inflated. But I was pretty impressed at the price points for those machines at the time. My buddy nabbed a refurbished M1 a few months after launch with 16gb ram/1TB SSD for $950 IIRC. He brings it to set for DIT/assistant editing work, still going strong entering 2024

danielquinn,
@danielquinn@lemmy.ca avatar

Can we install Linux on M1 machines yet? Last time I tried it was a nightmare and I failed miserably.

Synthuir,

Yes, Asahi via


<span style="color:#323232;">curl https://alx.sh | sh
</span>
priapus,

Yes, using Asahi Linux. Its not perfect, but very usable.

eager_eagle,
@eager_eagle@lemmy.world avatar

and to think windows had 2000 years ago…

lily33,

Well, when you get from 3 to 2000 in only a few years, the vast majority of these versions will be unusable. No wonder they had to drop everything after 11…

ivanafterall,
ivanafterall avatar

This is why I avoid the numbered Windows releases. XP, Vista, ME, or NT for this guy. Accept no substitutes.

troyunrau,
@troyunrau@lemmy.ca avatar

Windows CE sitting in the corner

Stillhart,

Sorry to be the bearer of bad news but NT was usually called NT 4.0 by those of us who worked with it. You’re probably better off skipping it anyways, it was terrible for anything other than file server…ing.

MonkderZweite,

than file server…ing.

Without any protection.

LeFantome,

Some of us used Windows NT 3.1, celebrated when 3.5 came out and actually worked, and when 4.0 came out we cringed because Windows NT 3.51 had finally gotten it right and 4.0 looked like it was going to cause problems with its Windows 95 inspired UI.

Turns out Windows NT 4.0 was actually pretty good ( especially on DEC Alpha ).

There is absolutely no doubt though that Windows 2000 Professional is the best product Microsoft ever released. If it ran 64 bit apps, I might still be running it today.

By the way, did you know that the Windows NT Resource Kit shipped with the GNU C compiler?

Stillhart,

I never worked with any versions of NT before 4, mainly because I was mainly doing desktop support stuff until I got my MCSE cert. But it did indeed work surprisingly well considering how janky it was.

Win2k was such an improvement it wasn’t even funny.

By the way, did you know that the Windows NT Resource Kit shipped with the GNU C compiler?

If I did, I’ve forgotten it by now. lol

FuglyDuck,
@FuglyDuck@lemmy.world avatar

ME??

You… uh, like pain, don’t you?

db2,

I use Mint 21. Checkmate.

finestnothing,

Windows 98 has entered the chat.

milicent_bystandr,

They really went downhill after that.

redcalcium,

Me with my Windows 2000 😏

SpeakinTelnet,

Fedora 39

tate,
@tate@lemmy.sdf.org avatar

This is a rare case where it matters that Linux is not an operating system.

fl42v,

Nixos is at 23.11 :) Also, rolling releases are kinda fun: the latest commit so far is 46ae0210ce163b3cba6c7da08840c1d63de9c701 which roughly translates to nixos-unstable 403509863565239228514588166489915404446713104129 :D

Atemu,
@Atemu@lemmy.ml avatar

You could take the revision number. nixos-unstable has 567011 commits currently.

d3Xt3r,

Laughs in Fedora 39

Stillhart,

Windows 98 enters the chat

packetloss,
@packetloss@lemmy.world avatar

Windows 2000 says hi to Windows 98

BunnyKnuckles,
@BunnyKnuckles@startrek.website avatar

Windows Server 2022 kicks 2000 in the balls, does a line of coke, and crashes.

SomethingBurger,

ArchLinux 20240101 wants to know your location.

Stillhart,

Sorry, you’re a little young for me. Half my version plus seven… you need to be at least 56 days old!

danielf,

Are we forgetting Windows 2000?

Redjard,
@Redjard@lemmy.dbzer0.com avatar

OpenSUSE 42.3 standing tall

Valmond,

Integer override, result -6279532

geekworking,

New versions of software are released because the older version was lacking in some way. Features, security, functionality.

Lowest number wins.

VelociCatTurd,

That’s why I only use TempleOS

ivanafterall,
ivanafterall avatar

Your system is defended by McAfee? That's cute. Mine is defended by the Lord God Jehovah.

magic_lobster_party,

Version numbering scenes are also arbitrary. In the case of Linux, the scheme is “Bump up the minor version until it’s too big. In that case bump up the major version instead”.

don,

I use HAL 9000. Get up on my level.

HAL_9_TRILLION,

I remain unimpressed.

WashedOver,
@WashedOver@lemmy.ca avatar

I recall at one point Windows 10 was going to be the last version of the OS and they would just maintain that. I’m wondering if they said that to get the last of the Windows 7 and XP users to finally move to 10?

ultranaut,

Windows 11 is kind of technically still just Windows 10 under the hood.

TheFriendlyDickhead,

And on the hood too. They realy didn’t change that much. Made a few things “simpler” aka worse and that’s it

words_number,

Hahaha so true

Stillhart,

Windows was still DOS under the hood for a long time. Win 98 was Win 95. Win 8 was Win 7. This is nothing new for MS.

TheRedSpade,

That was never the company’s official stance. One (non-spokesperson) employee said it once, and people ran with it.

7eter,

Windows 2000 enters the room

Ghostalmedia,
@Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world avatar

ChromeOS hit version 119 in December. That one is obviously the best.

This community has such a bias against web apps.

thecrotch,

I’d say this community has a much larger bias against Google, but that one is pretty justifiable.

grue,

Mac OS is actually at version 23 (they restarted the count at 10).

gregorum,

technically, Darwin, the microkernel, is at 23.2.0, but it was based on the Mach microkernel from NeXTSTEP/OPENSTEP (which is part of why it stared at 10)

the latest release of macOS is 14.2.1

grue,

I wasn’t trying to get into the weeds about actual kernel version numbers; I was just saying they made classic Mac OS from versions 1-9 and OS X from versions 1-14, and 9 + 14 = 23.

gregorum,

right, but the OS version number is 14.2.1. it’s the microkernel that’s 23.2.0

grue,

The OS version number is really 10.14.2.1, though.

gregorum, (edited )

wrong. Mac OS X ended with Mac OS 10.15 (Catalina) in 2018. macOS Big Sur, macOS 11, was the first in a new generation of macOS that succeeded macOS X and included significant architectural changes to the platform.

the current version is macOS 14.2.1 (Sonoma)

https://lemm.ee/pictrs/image/13fe39d4-d36c-41af-834b-5193854fae53.webp

grue,

I stand corrected. I gotta be honest: I used to daily-drive OS X up until about a decade ago, but I haven’t paid much attention to it since then.

Bogasse,
@Bogasse@lemmy.ml avatar

Browsers compared themselves with this metric for a while, but they had to stop before they reached an integer overflow.

thisfro,

Gnome goes brr

joeldebruijn,

MacOS according to other metrics tho. … xkcd.com/1056/

gregorum,

oldie but a goodie

Late2TheParty,
@Late2TheParty@lemmy.world avatar

There’s always an XKCD about it! I love it!

pineapplelover,

ahem I use arch btw

Grangle1,

Lowest version number, lowest need for radical change to keep up to date. Golf rules. Linux wins. Somebody get Tux a green jacket.

yardy_sardley,

I mean, technically Linux is still at 2.6, they’ve just been making up version numbers for the last 20 years or so.

Spoonbit,

:(

thecrotch,

All version numbers are made up

AI_toothbrush,

Use gnome then

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • linux@lemmy.ml
  • DreamBathrooms
  • mdbf
  • ngwrru68w68
  • magazineikmin
  • thenastyranch
  • rosin
  • khanakhh
  • osvaldo12
  • Youngstown
  • slotface
  • Durango
  • kavyap
  • InstantRegret
  • tacticalgear
  • anitta
  • ethstaker
  • provamag3
  • cisconetworking
  • tester
  • GTA5RPClips
  • cubers
  • everett
  • modclub
  • megavids
  • normalnudes
  • Leos
  • JUstTest
  • lostlight
  • All magazines