Tigbitties,
Tigbitties avatar
Voyajer,

We shouldn’t have let this dystopic surveillance shit happen in the first place

LollerCorleone,
LollerCorleone avatar

Were people given a choice in the first place? It has been pretty much thrust upon people across the world by capitalist overlords and political leaders.

Eddie,

That’s exactly the issue here. We did not vote on this. (at least here in the US)

Madison_rogue,
Madison_rogue avatar

"Detective Oliver stated in detail in her report what she observed in the video footage, and there was no mention of the female suspect being pregnant," the lawsuit says.

You would think this would be your first indication. You would think the victim would mention this as an identifying thing, "she was pregnant." You would think the detective would try to pull a recent photograph, or check cell phone records, or anything else to come to a more affirmative conclusion.

You would think, which seems the detective didn't do in this case.

some_guy,
some_guy avatar

But the computer said it was OK to violate her rights

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • tech
  • GTA5RPClips
  • DreamBathrooms
  • thenastyranch
  • magazineikmin
  • Durango
  • cubers
  • Youngstown
  • mdbf
  • slotface
  • rosin
  • ngwrru68w68
  • kavyap
  • tacticalgear
  • ethstaker
  • JUstTest
  • InstantRegret
  • Leos
  • normalnudes
  • everett
  • khanakhh
  • osvaldo12
  • cisconetworking
  • modclub
  • anitta
  • tester
  • megavids
  • provamag3
  • lostlight
  • All magazines