atomicpoet

@atomicpoet@mastodon.social

Product, QA & marketing @ #GreatApe

I'm searchable.

Putting the sauce in awesome.

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

atomicpoet, to random

To sum up where the Fediverse is right now:

  1. @EU_Commission backs it
  2. The @w3c backs it
  3. @fsf backs it
  4. @eff backs it
  5. Twitter Co-Founders @ev and @biz back it
  6. Web browsers like @mozilla and @Vivaldi back it
  7. Prominent 3rd party client devs like @paul backs it
  8. @gruber and @davew back it
  9. @georgetakei backs it

Am I missing anyone?

Oh yeah, YOU back it!

atomicpoet, to random

Thinking about how TWO devices that I own are “obsolete"—not because the hardware has kicked the bucket—but because Google simply doesn’t want to provide security updates for them.

And now that I think about it, it’s all so wasteful.

Here’s a strange thought for you. I own a Sony Walkman that was made decades ago. It still plays NEW cassettes sold on Bandcamp. The device is probably ~30-years-old.

None of these Android phones will be usable in 30 years.

atomicpoet, to random

Some people believe there's no purpose to "liking" something on Mastodon since it doesn't affect any algorithm.

Not the case.

It does something incredibly valuable: it acknowledges people.

Which is incredibly powerful, and is all the more important because it's not connected to gaming any algorithm.

By liking something on Mastodon, you are doing it honestly -- without any agenda at play other than that you like it.

So go ahead. Click that like button for its own sake.

atomicpoet,

When you boost, it’s for others.

But when you like, it’s for yourself.

atomicpoet, to random

Meanwhile at Meta...

Donald Trump is being welcomed back onto Facebook and Instagram.

What's the lesson here?

Don't trust Big Social with safeguarding the public good.

https://about.fb.com/news/2023/01/trump-facebook-instagram-account-suspension/

atomicpoet,

You think the the was big?

Eventually, there may be a .

It's entirely possible that many people from Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp will find their way to the Fediverse -- especially if a MAGA takeover goes into full swing!

Is the Fediverse prepared for that possibility?

atomicpoet,

No, Mastodon is not a "one size fits all" solution for the Fediverse.

We need to build more federated solutions for different use case scenarios.

People who are used to Facebook will want something similar to Facebook.

People who are used to Instagram will want something similar to Instagram.

We need to prepare for an influx of new users to Friendica and Pixelfed because those are the platforms most similar to Facebook and Instagram!

atomicpoet,

Additionally, we will need to build up audio and video services for the Fediverse because so much of Meta is now based on reels and live video.

I'm doing my part by building -- though it's in alpha, and not ready for production yet:

https://mastodon.social/@atomicpoet/109751823883434824

However, that only takes care of the software aspect.

We'll need lots of instances!

atomicpoet,

The Fediverse also needs more innovation.

It's one thing to clone popular services.

But we need to build creative and innovative new functionality that has yet to be created by a proprietary service!

Yes, it's nice that Mastodon, Friendica, and Pixelfed can replace some Big Social services.

Yet we also need to build features that are so compelling, Big Social users see the instant appeal of the Fediverse.

atomicpoet, to random

🚨 BIG NEWS! 🚨

Updates about -- the Fediverse streaming audio / video service that I'm building with @reiver (and a team)!

  1. We have successfully broadcast to 20 people distributed across North America. Some folks on the Fediverse were there to witness it!

  2. We have wireframed a registration process for joining a instance

  3. We have also wireframed a home feed and post UI/UX

  4. We've developed an additional skin for video conferencing

/ Thread🧵

Home fee and post UI/UX
video conferencing

atomicpoet, to random

Some positive press about Mastodon by way of John Naughton of the Guardian.

Unfortunately, it's full of inaccurate information. Namely:

  1. Mastodon is not a protocol. However, it uses many protocols, the most well-known and pertinent is ActivityPub.
  2. Mastodon is not the Fediverse, but it is one component of the Fediverse.
  3. The Fediverse is not a network of Twitter-like services. In fact, there are several services with no similarity to Twitter. Example: Peertube

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/jan/21/back-to-the-future-how-mastodon-is-restoring-the-lost-art-of-online-conversation

atomicpoet,

In the past, I've had big arguments with people who don't differentiate Mastodon from the Fediverse.

Their reasoning is that they believe the entirety of the Fediverse looks like Mastodon.

And my reply—every time—is: who in their right minds thinks that Peertube or Funkwhale or Lemmy looks like Mastodon?

Specifically, how does this site resemble Mastodon in any form?

https://open.audio/

atomicpoet,

The value of the Fediverse isn't that it replaces Twitter.

The value of the Fediverse is that it provides a de-centralized framework for social media services.

The Fediverse could be as revolutionary as the Web itself.

atomicpoet, to random

It's not that people aren't sticking around Mastodon.

There's more active users now than there were in September. Back then, there were only ~50,000 active users per month on mastodon.social.

It's that a certain segment of registrations were done either in protest, or as a Plan "B" if the Plan "A" (Twitter continues to be a going concern) fails.

That said, if Mastodon is seen merely as a Twitter alternative it will fail.

It's not a Twitter alternative.

https://www.theguardian.com/news/datablog/2023/jan/08/elon-musk-drove-more-than-a-million-people-to-mastodon-but-many-arent-sticking-around

atomicpoet,

@jdv63 In other words, you haven't replaced Mastodon with Twitter.

atomicpoet, to random

Streams is a Fediverse app that allows comment control. It lets you:

  1. Make public posts with comments turned off
  2. Accept delivery of comments in restricted or semi-public mode
  3. Turn off comments after a certain date

Honestly, this one feature is a godsend -- and I'm glad it exists somewhere on the Fediverse.

atomicpoet,
atomicpoet, to random

BIG NEWS: Pawoo.net, the world's 2nd biggest Mastodon instance, has just been acquired.

The entity acquiring them is the Mask Group, a business that also runs mstdn.jp and mastodon.cloud. They are also active in the so-called "Web 3.0" space.

If you haven't heard of pawoo.net, it's because many instances have de-federated from it.

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/mask-network-acquires-pawoo-net-070000858.html

atomicpoet, to random

This video of Elon Musk getting booed at a Dave Chappelle show is like audio candy to me.

Someone should make this an ASMR track that loops.

VIDEO: Elon Musk getting booed

atomicpoet, to random

1/ Someone asked, "How can basic HTML pages be social media -- and create something resembling the public square?" So here's a thread 🧵

If you were not around to witness the early web, let me explain what it was like.

During the 90s, most websites just used HTML. CSS and JavaScript existed in the latter part of the decade, but they were entirely optional.

The appeal of the web wasn't "rich media". Again, that came later.

What made the web exciting is what also made it social: hyperlinking

atomicpoet,

5/ If you want to know what this older version of the web looked like, and how it was explicitly social, I recommend browsing through Neocities.

Sites like these were why people literally just surfed the web as a hobby -- because there was so much social creativity going on that it could entertain you for days, weeks, months -- even years.

https://neocities.org/browse

atomicpoet,

6/ Now why do I mention that the web was designed to be social?

Because it's not so apparent now.

Nowadays, a static webpage implies no interaction.

But this was not true of the early web. Rather, the interaction was through static webpages themselves.

People communicated with each other via hyperlinks.

atomicpoet,

7/ What people forget is that the destruction of Meta and Twitter doesn't mean the destruction of the public square.

No, the web itself is the public square.

Anyone can set up a simple, basic website.

In fact, it's easier than ever to do this, and it costs very little money.

All you need is hardware.

And guess what? Almost all hardware made within the last 20 years is capable of being a webserver.

A basic website actually is the most accessible of social media tools.

atomicpoet,

8/ Now I'm not the biggest booster of the web. In fact, I've long since said that the Internet needs to decentralize away from it.

Nevertheless, the web is a tool -- an important tool -- and we'd be remiss if we didn't acknowledge that basic HTML (with hyperlinking) can do a whole lot of things that can address inequality on the Internet.

If you're an activist and you worry about censorship from Meta and Facebook, building your own website and self-hosting it is an incredible tool.

atomicpoet,

9/ The biggest problem with the Internet nowadays is increasing centralization.

What do I mean by this?

That there's an alarming decrease in sites that people visit on the Internet.

There's a trend to do everything on one site -- or to even bypass the Internet entirely and do it on one app.

In fact, there's a VC-driven race right now to build an "everything app". That's the end goal.

Should we let that happen? No!

This is why we should continue to build websites -- and visit them!

atomicpoet,

10/ That said, we should never look at the web as the only tool for re-building the public square.

The Internet is bigger than the web.

To work for a more equitable, fair Internet, we need to build for:

  1. The Web
  2. Email
  3. Chat (IRC, XMPP, The Matrix, etc.)
  4. Social Media
  5. File sharing

We can't let our foot off the gas pedal because certain powers-that-be are trying to do their damnedest to make us forget that the Internet was designed to be decentralized.

Let's give them hell!

/END

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • megavids
  • mdbf
  • DreamBathrooms
  • everett
  • magazineikmin
  • Durango
  • InstantRegret
  • rosin
  • Youngstown
  • love
  • slotface
  • GTA5RPClips
  • kavyap
  • ethstaker
  • Leos
  • ngwrru68w68
  • thenastyranch
  • tacticalgear
  • cubers
  • modclub
  • osvaldo12
  • cisconetworking
  • tester
  • khanakhh
  • normalnudes
  • provamag3
  • anitta
  • JUstTest
  • All magazines