fosho

@fosho@lemmy.ca

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

fosho,

because that attitude only helps the objectively more horrible politicians. how is this so hard to understand?

fosho,

stakes are far too high to have the luxury of this brain dead take.

fosho,

how about refusing to acknowledge that repubs would do the same or worse with this situation? no sane person thinks the situation is great. but brain dead is making a voting issue out of this when it isn’t one.

fosho,

if only wall street fines from the SEC were like this…

fosho,

I guess someone has to be the one to make the absolute dog shit comment in the thread.

fosho,

there is nothing relevant or acceptable about suggesting that an unhealthy person could reasonably die by being arrested. The methods of arrest are objectively fucking incorrect if they result in death for anyone generally being non violent.

fosho,

there’s a time and place for it. if it’s a conversation about detailed opinions then no. but when someone basically asks for a simple definition then yes.

fosho,

off topic but I think you missed a real opportunity by not making your username “Honytalk”

fosho,

obviously he doesn’t as insisted repeatedly and frantically by dick bags like you.

fosho,

hey dumfuck, America isn’t the only country in the world. we actually can look at what worked elsewhere.

America didn’t work because Americans like you refused to cooperate.

fosho,

judging by the votes, you are deluded

fosho,

you say this like you’re not the one doing mental gymnastics to justify your fucked up position.

fosho,

sure, but you are still completely wrong.

fosho,

plenty of others already did, which you are conveniently ignoring. your analogy is garbage and reveals how poorly conceived and deluded your position is. as such, you aren’t worth anyone’s effort.

fosho,

*what it was like moving a TV from one room to another in the 90s.

I know I’m being that guy, but meme grammar is often pretty abysmal.

fosho,

I’ll allow it when it’s warranted. this one just reeks of haste and overall reduces the quality of the impact. I felt like I was tripping on roots trying to read it.

fosho,

clearly the creator of this is an inexperienced writer.

fosho,

did you even read the comment you’re responding to?

fosho,

You absolutely did not. The question was not: “Why don’t news organizations claim Boeing execs murdered a guy…?” The commenter was clearly aware of the problem of libel, which you completely ignored. They asked why news orgs aren’t discussing the fact that the death comes at a suspiciously convenient time - because they aren’t. This is not the same as claiming that he was murdered by Boeing.

fosho,

it’s not libelous to discuss the elephant in the room. you did not explain anything. you just disregarded the question with your assumption.

fosho,

wowdaft. it couldn’t be more clear that the suggestion is discussing the suspicious nature WITHOUT making direct accusations.

fosho,

heh, the subtle suggestion that one shouldn’t have a life away from here is embarrassing.

fosho,

what are you even talking about? you’ve lost the plot.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • JUstTest
  • rosin
  • mdbf
  • osvaldo12
  • ethstaker
  • tacticalgear
  • DreamBathrooms
  • thenastyranch
  • magazineikmin
  • modclub
  • Youngstown
  • everett
  • slotface
  • kavyap
  • megavids
  • GTA5RPClips
  • khanakhh
  • cisconetworking
  • tester
  • ngwrru68w68
  • normalnudes
  • Durango
  • InstantRegret
  • cubers
  • provamag3
  • anitta
  • Leos
  • lostlight
  • All magazines