mosiacmango

@mosiacmango@lemm.ee

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

mosiacmango, (edited )

If youre friendly with your neighbor, point to point wifi is cheap and very effective. You can share their interent if they are okay with it.

You buy 2 wifi antennas for $200, set one up at the point of origin and line it up with the other at the end point. Plug each end into a router and you’re all set.

You dont even need perfect line of sight, although it does help. Range is 5 miles, so 1000ft shouldn’t be a challenge. They are preconfigured, so basically just plug and play.

Edit : they have an even better set for $400 if you want 1.5x the speed above.

mosiacmango, (edited )

Very common in rural areas. She is most likely a customer of a WISP, or a wireless ISP. They will often partner with a township to set up on a water tower or grain silo or some other high point, then have a fiber internet line brought to that tower.

From there, they will deploy pretty much this exact device for each client, sometimes piggy backing on client sites to extend their range.

5G cell service modems and starlink are making wisps less common, but they are still out there.

Here’s a great older article about a home grown WISP setup in the rural islands near Seattle. After years of terrible and unreliable internet service, the neighbors got together, paid for a microwave tower internet stream from the mainland, and rigged up relays and wireless access points in trees in order to get good, reliable internet to everyone involved. Most everything described here would be considerably easier today.

mosiacmango, (edited )

You can claim the IDF has no regard for human life, so they don’t care if they kill innocent Gazans (I would disagree, but whatever). But to claim that they try to eradicate them is crazy.

The IDF absolutely does not care if it kills innocent civilians. You do not establish invisible “kill zones” in a civilain occupied area and indiscriminately fire on men, women and children if you care about human life. These zones are so ubiquitous and so ill policed that the IDF killed 3 jewish hostages that escaped captivity, hostages that striped themselves shirtless, called out in hebrew, waved white flags, had large signs saying they were escaped hostages, and still the IDF ran them down like dogs to kill because they violated a invisible “kill zone” boundary.

Also, Israel evacuated 800,000 people from Rafah before entering, why do that if they just wanted them to die?

After months of intense and very public pressure and a first in decades withholding of weapons from the US, and after very publicly murdering humanitarian aid workers that cost Israel a great deal of international support for this war. Even then they barely setup any services like tents, water or sanitation for those 800k forced refuges moved into a “expanded humanitarian area,” i.e concentration camp, all while your ministers like Ben Gvir call for the literal genocide of the Palestinian people to continue.

These are not the actions of a country that cares for civilain life.

mosiacmango,

Housing soldiers in citizens homes in modern times would be inefficient and dangerous. It would drastically affect readiness and deployability amd lead to general unrest.

It is in every way a very outdated amendment, as that’s not how professional armies are fielded in modern times, nor is there any press to go back to what was a barbaric act when the law was past.

We likely dont need it, but it’s basically moot, and the construction is impossible to amend.

mosiacmango, (edited )

never wound up being actually true since they go against the very nature of physics.

This is an incredibly wild statement when you have no data on the device’s construction or operation.

Youre complaining about a lack of data then making wild assumptions about it with no data.

Not exactly a good scientific method here, mate.

mosiacmango,

Are you saying novel mechanical engineering designs are impossible? That the mechanism of a leaf blower is so near perfection, that a well funded team of 4 mechanical engineering students could not, without VIOLATING THE LAWS OF PHYSICS, have simply found a better mechanism?

I agree with your “show me the numbers” critique, but I find your complete disregard of what may be a better answer without any data at all to be equally foolhardy.

mosiacmango,

Not if you only hit it in certain circumstances, i.e breaks at work, out drinking, etc.

That kind of 1%/week gradual decrease would probably lead to less of an addiction to line up with less of a dose as well.

mosiacmango,

Fuck yeah buddy. 167b is getting close to 200 billion cancelled, which would be about 50% of the 400 billion he tried to cancel that the supreme court knocked down.

Shows it was all about making political hay. Hes cancelling a huge amount of debt, but since it’s in a quiet way, no republican cares.

mosiacmango,

“Flooding the zone with shit.”

mosiacmango, (edited )

The article is about municipal broadband, since the OP wanted to clickbait.

mosiacmango,

He realized the judge was getting a cell ready for him.

mosiacmango, (edited )

“You can’t get blood from a stone” is classic in the US. “No more juice from the squeeze” is another variant.

mosiacmango, (edited )

The person who handed him the gun entire job was to make sure it was safe to use that gun as prop on a movie, to simulate danger, but in an utterly safe manner.

That person not only failed to check the gun, but they were also the source of the live ammo. The armorer has already been sentenced to prison for involuntary manslaughter.

“Every gun is dangerous” is the correct general mantra, but when you hire a person to specifically “make a gun not dangerous” who then directly hands you the gun, it’s pretty reasonable to assume it’s not dangerous. Pulling the trigger as part of your job and then killing someone afterwards isn’t directly your fault at that point.

It’s terrible, but we know from the armorers trial the cause was her extreme negligence, not Alec baldwin expecting his employees and coworkers to do their job.

mosiacmango, (edited )

While I largely agree, I still don’t fully agree. He should have treated it as loaded because it’s a gun, but I also understand why he didn’t. There are many dangerous facets in our lives where we trust professionals, like doctors and pilots and chefs. Professionals that count on other professionals doing their job and keeping the whole system running.

You can extra prepare, and argue that everyone should at all times, but its also entirely reasonable that we dont run background checks on pilots or breathalyze them before they get onto a plane. We expect the system to work for many dangerous things, and it almost always does. The fact that it almost always does is part of the issue here, because believing the armorer was doing their job to keep people safe is a reasonable assumption.

Should he have applied extra caution to checking that gun? You bet. Do I think he was complacent because of the systems they had on set for gun safety? Yes. Do I think that rises to murder or even extreme negligence? No. It was a lapse in judgement that ended with him killing a person, and that is terrible, but not criminal.

mosiacmango,

His actual actions aren’t important, because his results are “holy.”

If you asked them about a “demon rat” that had doen exactly what their “holy” man had done, they would rant endlessly about his vile acts and his damnation.

Their zealotry is transactional, that’s all. Give them what they want, and you can be their savior too.

mosiacmango, (edited )

So still ignoring the current 3000/yr teen car deaths completly for a “ebikes may be the real danger” comment? Okay then.

Your saying a lithium car fire, one of the hardest to put out fires, will not cause any building to burn down, anywhere? Because all parking garages are structurally designed to withstand that style of fire at the base of their building?

mosiacmango, (edited )

So your retort to the statistics of thousands of yearly teen deaths to cars is “someday, an ebike may kill someone. What then, huh?”

You know electric car batteries also smoke off in rare cases too, right? That they are often parked in buildings and may also eventually burn a building down?

mosiacmango, (edited )

The 15-50% is apprently women who have some sensitivity to different color bands, but not full terrachromacy. That condition has only been identified once according to wikipedia. Id expect in men with XXY chromosomes, for it to still be stunningly rare, if even present at all.

Its fully possible that the above sum is the number of men with some enhanced color depth, but even then in a population of 4 billion, 1-4 million is a very small number.

mosiacmango, (edited )

Death of the author” serves us all again.

mosiacmango, (edited )

Exclusive to women, as it’s a rare mutation that requires two X chromosomes.

There could be a rare, rare case of someone with XXY chromosomes also getting it, but that would be two very rare human conditions hitting at once.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • Leos
  • ngwrru68w68
  • InstantRegret
  • thenastyranch
  • magazineikmin
  • GTA5RPClips
  • rosin
  • osvaldo12
  • tacticalgear
  • Youngstown
  • slotface
  • khanakhh
  • kavyap
  • DreamBathrooms
  • JUstTest
  • modclub
  • everett
  • provamag3
  • cubers
  • cisconetworking
  • ethstaker
  • Durango
  • mdbf
  • anitta
  • megavids
  • normalnudes
  • tester
  • lostlight
  • All magazines