nickwitha_k

@nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

nickwitha_k,

For myself, it’s ADHD and keeping things open that I intend to get back to but rarely do.

nickwitha_k,

Not reinvented. Just categorized. Harems would be a form of polygamous relationship. There are tons of different forms of poly relationships, including cheating while in a “monogamous” relationship.

nickwitha_k,

Shawty got JEANS, JEANS, JEANS, JEANS, JEANS

Study reveals "widespread, bipartisan aversion" to neighbors owning AR-15 rifles (www.psypost.org)

A recent study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences reveals that across all political and social groups in the United States, there is a strong preference against living near AR-15 rifle owners and neighbors who store guns outside of locked safes. This surprising consensus suggests that when it comes...

nickwitha_k,

This is factually incorrect. Don’t take this as a judgement on you or your position, just that you should be approaching any side from a factually sound place.

“AR” in “AR-15” stands for ArmaLite Rifle. ArmaLite is the firearms manufacturer where Eugene Stoner was working when he designed the rifle.

Assault rifles, and most other weapons capable of automatic fire, are generally not intended to be used as “spray 'n pray” weapons. That is generally reserved for stationary machine guns (think the beach on D-Day).

Assault rifles generally are classified as weapons that fire an intermediary cartridge that are capable of select-fire. Meaning that they fire cartridges with size and energy in between centerfire pistol (ex. 9x19mm) and full-power rifle (ex. .30-06 Springfield AKA 7.62x73mm) and the operator may select between multiple modes of fire. Usually these are semi-automatic (one round per trigger pull), fully-automatic (continues to fire rounds while trigger is held down) and/or burst-fire (two to three rounds per trigger pull).

The use of fully-automatic fire on modern assault rifles is extremely limited, with standard issue military rifles in the US military having the fire mode completely absent until the recent switch from the M4 (semi-auto and burst-fire only) to the M4A1 (semi-auto and full-auto). Tactically, fully-automatic fire is usually limited in use to room clearing in close combat and for suppressing fire (keeping the enemy combatants from leaving cover) to allow the squad to break contact and retreat to safety. This is reflected in the types of units that have been consistently issued assault rifles capable of full-auto; generally special forces and reconnaissance units that may be deployed outside of range of friendly support.

Full-auto in an assault rifle is simply not very useful in modern military roles. A standard issue magazine holds 30 rounds. An M4A1 in full-auto fires about 800 rounds-per-minute. That means that it takes just a bit less than 2.5 seconds to empty an entire magazine, putting the soldier in the vulnerable position of needing to reload. In most situations, it’s far better to employee a squad automatic weapon, which is generally fed by a belt with much higher capacity, allowing sustained suppressing fire to allow allies to maneuver.

All of that said, I do, personally, agree that civilians (including police forces) ought not to have military-like firearms primarily intended for shooting humans. But that is because I am mostly a pacifist. The ArmaLite Rifle (AR-15) is NOT a select-fire rifle but a semi-auto one. It can, however, be modified into one (illegally) and uses the same rounds and accessories. To me, that makes it “military-like” and should likely be heavily regulated (but won’t be).

TL;DR - Whichever side you are arguing, do it with facts.

nickwitha_k,

Fallout 2 really is the best game not just in the West-coast saga but the entire series.

nickwitha_k,

What was that? I couldn’t hear it over the sound of not having adware integrated into my OS. ;)

nickwitha_k,

Hey. I went to the ER and didn’t have to pay a dime of the near $100k that I was billed. This is primarily because I was hit by an SUV and they were ruled completely at fault. I did have to setup a payment plan for the $5k that the US hospital system charged for my wife spraining her ankle two weeks before or wedding. Yeah. That was fun. Literally cost more than we could afford for the wedding.

Fuck this privatized, for-profit system.

nickwitha_k,

The Louis C.K. who pulled out his little Louis and masturbated in front of female coworkers without their consent? That one?

nickwitha_k,

Informed consent is important. If one party is unaware that it is NOT a joke, that’s not informed consent.

Hey i just wanna know are raccoons evil in some kind of way ?

A lot of things i thought were cute and nice like dolphines, ducks, cats (i saw one cat eat anothers new born), dogs (multiple cases of eating dead owners due to a variety of reasons starting from trying to wake em up to other malicious reasons), hamsters etc turned out to be wrong . Raccoons are the only thing i believe in...

nickwitha_k,

I’m going with that.

nickwitha_k,

What we perceive as “guilt” from domestic dogs is generally classified as a fear/submission display. It’s anthropomorphizing. Not saying that dogs don’t have feelings. They absolutely do. Guilt and shame, however, are likely not in their pallette.

nickwitha_k,

Are raccoons evil? Absolutely not. Like humans, some individual animals may engage in anti-social activities (be assholes) but, with a few exceptions, non-human animals do not engage in things from a long-term perspective that is required to develop philosophy, culture, ethics, and morality. Another requirement is likely possessing Theory of the Mind; an understanding that other beings have their own mental states (intention, desires, knowledge, etc.). Few non-human animals have been demonstrated to have this ability and frequently, the evidence suggests that it is also not an ability present in all members of the species.

So, the TL;DR is: No and very few animals could have the capacity to be “evil”.

So, what are they?

Cute, inquisitive, intelligent, clever, and, yes, fairly dangerous. Raccoons have sharp teeth and claws that can do serious damage to humans and houses, and they can be very deadly to cats and dogs. For canines, it’s generally smaller breeds that are at risk but, in some places, like Western Washington state, populations of raccoons have been observed hunting in packs to take down larger dogs.

Why did I mention houses? Well, raccoons are intelligent and understand enough to get themselves into trouble and cause serious property damage. There are multiple accounts of people feeding local raccoons then, after coming home from a vacation, discovering that the raccoons that they had been feeding had pulled shingles off the roof and damaged the building’s sheathing in an attempt to get the food that had been suddenly cut-off.

Additionally, raccoons can carry rather dangerous infectious diseases. On the viral side, they are a major vector of the rabies virus as well as distemper. For bacteria, they have been shown to be vector of listeria and leptospirosis. They also can carry a number of parasites, including acting as the primary host for Baylisascaris procyonis, which is a particularly resilient roundworm (eggs can survive 20% bleach solution) that can cause encephalitis in humans.

Trash pandas are awesome but, best enjoyed from a safe distance.

nickwitha_k,

“You mean a mortising bit?”

nickwitha_k,

They do indeed really cut square holes. They’re called mortising bits. Like the other commentor stated, they’re basically a combination of a chisel and a drill. The drill does most of the work in waste removal while the square blades give you 90° corners.

One could also potentially consider a rotary broach to be a “square drill” (supposing that it is a square and not a hex or other shape).

nickwitha_k,

Nah. Don’t sell yourself short. Your explanation is accurate and to the point.

nickwitha_k,

Due to how my brain works (ADHD), I specifically have trouble with being concise. So, despite what you may think, I find your accurate and concise explanation to be excellent.

nickwitha_k,

Yup. Over here in the Western US, nearly every apartment is built as cheaply as possible and run by slumlords that will do everything that they can to refuse to return deposits. Painting over bugs and black mold between tenants is the norm, in my experience, not the exception. Add to that that insulation between apartments is scant, if present and frequently there are no physical barriers between apartment building attic accesses (in every top-story apartment that I’ve been in, it would be easily possible to gain access to others’ apartments via the attic and the attics also act to channel sound between all top apartments).

nickwitha_k,

And by doing so, they force the rest of us to bring politics everywhere, or risk having everything that cooperative society has worked for undone. It’s really tiring to have the be eternally vigilant for bullshit that shouldn’t even be seriously considered.

nickwitha_k,

English is my native language. I have a smattering of Malay from early childhood (my mother’s first language), and have limited proficiency in ASL, German, Spanish, Italian, Irish, French, and Finnish (my proudest language moment was purchasing an apple from an old farmer in Helsinki who spoke no English). I also know a tiny amount of Japanese.

I’m contemplating whether to work on my existing proficiency or add a con-lang to the mix like Esperanto or Belter Creole.

nickwitha_k,

Also, Netanyahu marched about calling for Rabin’s death prior to his assassination. Important extra context.

nickwitha_k,

Technofeudalism

Nope. We’ve been over this. It’s still just capitalism and regular old fascism and neo-feudalism. Don’t need a new term to try to imply that technology is the cause. Doesn’t matter that the tech industry is involved, it’s still just wealthy people using profitable industry to try to cement power over others.

nickwitha_k,

If that 1% means local LGBTQ+ people not being subject to mass murder, why wouldn’t you pick 99%, especially if those are the only realistic outcomes?

nickwitha_k,

These things cost billions to create. Those billions are often (or should be anyway) spread out over the millions of people who can use the drug.

And the US government funding was equivalent to private industry for 99% of drugs developed this century.

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10148199/

nickwitha_k,

It would be easier if it wasn’t illegal for Federal public institutions to hold the intellectual property. As it is, even if the research is 100% tax-payer funded, and conducted exclusively through public institutions, a private company still gets to take ownership of the patent and exclusivity rights. It’s pretty disgusting.

Pretty much this meme: https://lemmy.sdf.org/pictrs/image/df2ef9db-8f58-4697-8ce8-28779ab3e96d.png

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • anitta
  • mdbf
  • magazineikmin
  • Durango
  • Youngstown
  • vwfavf
  • slotface
  • ngwrru68w68
  • khanakhh
  • rosin
  • kavyap
  • thenastyranch
  • PowerRangers
  • DreamBathrooms
  • Leos
  • ethstaker
  • hgfsjryuu7
  • osvaldo12
  • cubers
  • GTA5RPClips
  • modclub
  • InstantRegret
  • everett
  • tacticalgear
  • normalnudes
  • tester
  • cisconetworking
  • provamag3
  • All magazines