jens,
@jens@social.finkhaeuser.de avatar

I would like to remind folk today of the so-called "Nazi bar" problem:

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Nazi_bar

"A space in which bigots or extremists have come to dominate due to a lack of moderation or by moderators wishing to remain neutral or avoid conflict."

You can extend this to Meta. No, plenty of folk joining their AP-enabled service will NOT be bigots or extremists.

But Meta is. Because they already treat the fediverse as a place where "shot-callers" need to be influenced.

toon,
@toon@toonvandeputte.be avatar

@jens is the fediverse a single space though? I don't think there's a way to prevent meta from launching an AP-compatible service?

jens,
@jens@social.finkhaeuser.de avatar

@toon No, no, of course not to either! But there isn't a single bar, either, we have thousands.

Just like each bar keep needs to decide whether they want to end up running a Nazi bar, each instance admin needs to decide whether they want to kick Meta out now, or wait until it's too late.

There will be plenty of admins who wait and see.

toon,
@toon@toonvandeputte.be avatar

@jens I think you lose credibility if you decide to shut them out before the service even exists. But I was around when IE determined what html features a site should report, and when Twitter drowned out rss, so I appreciate the risk. The IE/HTML example gives me hope though. And Google also didn't take over email with Gmail.

jens,
@jens@social.finkhaeuser.de avatar

@toon Gmail is the reason running your own email server is much, much harder, because of SPF, DMARC, etc. requirements that do not actually protect against spam. They have put other email providers on the defensive.

Similarly, WebKit-based browsers effectively control what HTML features exist.

I think what happened is that the dominance here is not as overt as we feared with IE back in the day, but it doesn't make it any less effective.

jens,
@jens@social.finkhaeuser.de avatar

@toon So, yes, I have shut them out preemptively.

But then I effectively run a single-user instance at the moment, so I can be very free with that.

The thing with credibility loss is that it's not something the target person loses, it's something the people lose in a person. It's not my responsibility to manage other people's loss.

toon,
@toon@toonvandeputte.be avatar

@jens Credibility is very much something you have, in relation to to society at large. You can pretend that others' opinions about you don't matter, but of course they do.

jens,
@jens@social.finkhaeuser.de avatar

@toon Nah, you don't have credibility with society at large. You have different levels of credibility with thousands of overlapping societies.

What you are talking about is popularity, i.e. the credibility you have with the largest intersection of people.

I can absolutely state that doesn't matter to me, as long as I have enough credibility with people I care about. Story of my life, mate.

toon,
@toon@toonvandeputte.be avatar

@jens I just want to clarify that I am most definitely not talking about popularity.

jens,
@jens@social.finkhaeuser.de avatar

@toon Alright.

toon,
@toon@toonvandeputte.be avatar

@jens So you would've preferred that websites block access from Chrome and e-mail servers block all Google-mail? How would that result in anything positive?

jens,
@jens@social.finkhaeuser.de avatar

@toon The latter would result in a marked reduction of spam.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • DreamBathrooms
  • magazineikmin
  • everett
  • InstantRegret
  • rosin
  • Youngstown
  • slotface
  • love
  • khanakhh
  • kavyap
  • tacticalgear
  • GTA5RPClips
  • thenastyranch
  • modclub
  • megavids
  • mdbf
  • normalnudes
  • Durango
  • ethstaker
  • osvaldo12
  • cubers
  • ngwrru68w68
  • tester
  • anitta
  • cisconetworking
  • Leos
  • provamag3
  • JUstTest
  • All magazines