Siltaer, to random French
@Siltaer@mamot.fr avatar

in the ultra vires trap? French perspectives after the Quadrature du Net ruling
https://hal.science/hal-04536000
The ECJ judgments of 2020-10-06 regarding and have been extensively commented on with regard to the protection of personal data, but are also highly significant in terms of the national security law of the various Member States.
We can now focus on the impact had by these rulings on the law of the Member 2 States, and in particular on French law

gualdo, to random Italian
@gualdo@mastodon.uno avatar

La corte di giustizia europea () ha dichiarato illegale la memorizzazione delle impronte digitali nelle carte di identità (come nella italiana)

Il divieto di raccolta delle impronte entrerà in vigore nel 2026

La soluzione attuale è stata introdotta per rendere difficile la falsificazione di documenti, ma questo obiettivo si raggiunge anche con altri metodi

Mentre, se un dato biometrico viene rubato, la vittima è esposta per tutta la vita

echo_pbreyer, to Belgium German
@echo_pbreyer@digitalcourage.social avatar

🇬🇧 Liberties‘ Report 2024 finds that & ignore jurisprudence on . https://dq4n3btxmr8c9.cloudfront.net/files/oj7hht/Liberties_Rule_Of_Law_Report_2024_FULL.pdf

➡️ It‘s obvious: The 🇪🇺 Commission should enforce 🇪🇺 law and stop the programme aiming at even more !

brekke, to Law Norwegian
@brekke@eupolicy.social avatar

If the Court of Justice of the European Union is, as is often argued, the most powerful international court the world has seen, why is serious resistance against it not more commonplace?

This is the question I ask in my PhD thesis, which I successfully defended at the last Friday. Today it has been made available open access through the university repository!

https://cadmus.eui.eu/handle/1814/76659

@politicalscience @law

ilumium, to TikTok
@ilumium@eupolicy.social avatar

One down, three to go!

: we're not a and this will expose our shady business to the world mimimimi

Court of Justice: yeah whatever, no. 👏


https://curia.europa.eu/jcms/upload/docs/application/pdf/2024-02/cp240028en.pdf

TheEuropeanNetwork, to Europe

23 years after the Bosman ruling, another Luxembourg-based European Court of Justice (ECJ) judgment has shaken the foundations of European football as we know it. But what are its effects?

Super League v UEFA: What’s next?

https://www.euronews.com/2023/12/21/super-league-v-uefa-whats-next

#Europe #EU #Football #UEFA #ECJ #SuperLeague

TheEuropeanNetwork, (edited ) to Bulgaria

Government offices across the EU can ban employees from wearing religious symbols in the interest of neutrality, the EU’s top court has ruled, though it stressed that such restrictions must be applied equally to all employees and fit within the legal context of each member state.

The court of justice of the European Union said such bans were permissible in order to enforce an “entirely neutral administrative environment”.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/nov/29/government-offices-in-eu-can-ban-wearing-of-religious-symbols-court-rules

ilumium, to humanrights
@ilumium@eupolicy.social avatar
TheEuropeanNetwork, to Bulgaria

A forthcoming ruling by the EU top court should clarify the use of names linked with foodstuffs of animal origin for plant-based food products, according to meat alternatives campaigners.

The issue was raised in a CAP reform, but the attempt at a veggie burger ban was rejected by the European Parliament in 2020 as MEPs voted down amendments aimed at reserving meat-related terms and names exclusively for edible parts of animals.

https://www.euractiv.com/section/agriculture-food/news/beef-over-veggie-burger-name-to-be-settled-by-eu-court-ruling/

echo_pbreyer, to internet German
@echo_pbreyer@digitalcourage.social avatar

🇬🇧 Breakthrough for our right to private internet use! The ruling against puts an end to pervasive tracking. Internet companies must now be honest: Money or privacy for their services?

More: https://t.co/K7W201hIA6 https://www.patrick-breyer.de/en/ecj-ruling-on-meta-browsing-records/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=mastodon

davidallengreen, (edited ) to random
@davidallengreen@mastodon.green avatar

I am sorry to those who came over here with me in November in the hope and expectation that a good chunk of UK legal Twitter would also come.

Sadly most of the accounts I recommended as they came over then are now fairly quiet on here - many not having posted since December/January.

Am looking out for other legal accounts to recommend - and if you know of any, do let me know.

Any area of law, any jurisdiction.

FionaMullenCY,

@davidallengreen There is a thread under way on the case right now https://legal.social/@malteengeler/110656883547328296

malteengeler, to internet German
@malteengeler@legal.social avatar

Ok, so today the published its judgement for case C-252/21 . The case touches upon issues I have been writing about since became applicable. I’ll focus on the and broader data economy issues only.

Let’s go 🧵

Gerard, to random
@Gerard@mstdn.social avatar

Dear ,

Please stop handing down important judgements just before summer. I should be writing.
Kind regards,

Me, and probably many other academics who planned this time to finally get some work done

Gerard,
@Gerard@mstdn.social avatar

After careful reading of the Meta/Bundeskartellamt judgement by the on compliance by Zuckerberg et all, this is how I imagine Koen Lenaerts:

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • JUstTest
  • GTA5RPClips
  • DreamBathrooms
  • cubers
  • mdbf
  • everett
  • magazineikmin
  • Durango
  • Youngstown
  • rosin
  • slotface
  • modclub
  • kavyap
  • ethstaker
  • megavids
  • ngwrru68w68
  • thenastyranch
  • cisconetworking
  • khanakhh
  • osvaldo12
  • InstantRegret
  • Leos
  • tester
  • tacticalgear
  • normalnudes
  • provamag3
  • anitta
  • lostlight
  • All magazines