Are you interested in discussing current trends in Open Science, share your ideas to improve research culture and network with like-minded individuals?
New @Centre_Mersenne !
We now offer the suggestion of articles. This feature allows you to associate a list of "recommended" articles with a given article and display them in the record
👉 https://urlz.fr/lBzc
Cad_Lin actively invests in research culture in a variety of ways, from sponsoring events to supporting initiatives that promote open science practices and policies. Join us in advancing the field of human language research! #researchculture#openscience#sponsorship
Wow! I checked my earliest presentation on #OpenScience , from 2009.
Final slide shows pretty much the same solutions we are still proposing today, 15 years later: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5526634
Maybe the discussions about Open Science have centered too much on problems, rather than strategies on how to get these solutions actually implemented?
Open science research that doesn't share its own data?
A paper on open practices is being published in #CHI2023. But unlike the #OpenScience it promotes, it does not share its data. What could be an excellent discussion of research practices is instead a poor example of scrutinizability. A call for openness:
"814 (54%) authors of papers where data were indicated to be ‘available upon request’ responded to our data requests, and 226 (14%) either shared or indicated willingness to share all or some data." Also, the response bias was racist. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41597-023-02129-8
Cad_Lin supports the concept of open science, which seeks to open up the entire research and publication process. We encourage responsible behaviors in research and promote a culture that supports collaboration, diversity, inclusion, and openness. #openscience#researchculture
Does anyone know of examples of data from qualitative social research (anonymized transcripts of interviews/focus groups) being made publicly available? #OpenData#OpenScience#AcademicTwitter
Kicking off #EGU23 with a fascinating panel discussion on improving how scientists’ research outputs are assessed - moving on from impact factors and “publish or perish”
I recently reviewed 2 manuscripts for PNAS. I knew the handling editors, NAS members, to be sympathetic to #openscience so I used the opportunity to urge them to push the journal to adopt stronger policies.
Now we find out that in the most public of all NAS activities, COI statements are kept secret!
"The vast majority supported sharing qualitative data so long as their data were deidentified and shared only among researchers [but] raised concerns about confidentiality if the data were not adequately deidentified [...] Researchers may have a stronger obligation to share qualitative data than previously thought.
I've spent the morning with a bunch of colleagues from across my university working on our project to to get the university to foster #OpenScience / #OpenScholarship as a priority. We're talking about hiring processes, #OpenSource software, research dissemination #OpenAccess,, evaluation... all kinds of things. It's really exciting and I'm hopeful that due to the interdisciplinary nature the organizers ensured in our process, this will have legs.
Save the Date! "Identify and track your research projects with the Research Activity Identifier (RAiD)" Webinar on 05/24/2023 at 1pm PST/4pm EST. 🗓️
This a great chance to learn about #RAiD and how it can help researchers and research institutions identify research projects and keep track of project activities!
#F1000Research is not going to get many reviewers for its #OpenPeerReview system if after two and a half months, a review of version 2 of a paper is still not published:
There's a "perfect storm" of paper mills and reliance on legacy systems that is causing huge problems for publishers, says @catmacOA chairing yesterday's #OASPA webinar "Scholarly Communication in Crisis". What are the solutions? #PublicationEthics#PaperMills#OpenScience
Su https://mastodon.social/ Possiamo riformare il modo in cui si valuta la ricerca e raccomandare l'#openscience, come COARA, ma se non discutiamo chi valuta e perché lo fa, la scienza, intrappolata nel gioco a somma zero della valutazione di stato (centralizzata, autoritaria), sarà aperta soltanto a parole. Se siete o conoscete firmatari di #COARA, fateli aderire alla proposta #AISA. La questione va portata in Europa!
I started the #delightful project. It's similar to Awesome project on #Github by Sindre Sorhus, but only curates lists related to #FOSS, #OpenScience and #OpenData resources. If @abundance wants that, they might maintain their own sublist and be part of https://delightful.club that is steadily growing.
Tell me again how "open science" works? This article processing charge is literally more than my allocated salary for this project. From a reputable journal too. @elsevierconnect#OpenScience