jacksantucci, to random
dougdougdoug,
@dougdougdoug@mastodon.social avatar

@jacksantucci Here in Arlington, Va., we have a five-member county board elected at large to staggered four-year terms. One of every four years, two seats are filled, with each voter getting two votes. As you’d expect, it produces a panel with no diversity of views. is under consideration but wouldn’t fundamentally change that. You: “We should take the single vote as given, then use other components of the rules to get us closer to whatever outcomes we might agree on.” (1/?)

alan, to pnw
@alan@subdued.social avatar

Hey and folks! Join us at the happy hour at Stones Throw Brewery in Fairhaven tonight (Thursday Sep 28) at 5:45pm! Learn about with our friendly local activists! https://www.mobilize.us/fairvotewa/event/583327/

TucsonSentinel, to Tucson
@TucsonSentinel@mastodon.tucsonsentinel.com avatar

Ranked choice voting grows in popularity - and so have efforts to ban it https://www.tucsonsentinel.com/nationworld/report/091523_democracy_ranked_choice/ranked-choice-voting-grows-popularity-and-so-have-efforts-ban-it/
Ranked choice voting has the potential to make voting more representative of the majority, ease intense conflicts between political parties and make gerrymandering nearly impossible - but despite the upsides and successes, bans continue throughout the country.

BrianPierce,
@BrianPierce@mstdn.social avatar
Radical_EgoCom, to random

Democrats When They Want Your Vote:
•"Healthcare is a right!"
•"Climate change is real!"
•"We need to end all wars!"

Democrats when they have power:
•Block Medicare for All
•Expand fossil fuel subsidies
•Increase the Military budget

VOTING BLUE DOESN'T CHANGE A THING

travisfw,
@travisfw@fosstodon.org avatar

@Ac3ofDr4gons @Radical_EgoCom presidential ranked choice voting ( ) would destroy the two party system and leave the country intact.

Andres4NY, to random
@Andres4NY@social.ridetrans.it avatar

I boosted this last night, but I'm doing it again because it was so interesting (albeit long): https://fosstodon.org/@tcely/110705153826062120

Click through to start the video at 1:13:00 or so (to skip right to the RCV problems).

I'm now a fan of . The part where Alameda County screwed up their counts and actually seated the wrong candidate, discovering their fuck up a month later is just.. wow.

dougdougdoug,
@dougdougdoug@mastodon.social avatar

@Andres4NY Good to see discussion about this, but it’s just not true that there’s anything inherent in that requires a single point of failure or that causes delays in counting votes. Jurisdictions have been holding back second- and third- (etc.) place votes just to make things appear simpler. But there is a limited number of permutations of ballots in any election, and computers are perfectly capable of recording and reporting on each.

georgetakei, to random

We've all had a day or two to process what the Supreme Court just did.

The battle for our country and for the rule of law, not of oligarchs, lies ahead of us. Let us recommit to it now, and with grave determination resolve to turn this tide back in 2024.

I am ready. Are you?

PDXDemSocialist,

@georgetakei Will have a vote on in 2024. Hopefully this passes so we can vote on the people we want.

dougdougdoug, to oregon
@dougdougdoug@mastodon.social avatar

Great that voters will have an opportunity to adopt for local and statewide primary and general elections in 2024. One thing I'm afraid they're overlooking: The Presidential electors chosen by need to be freed up to vote for their assigned candidate OR a different candidate, perhaps one chosen by their assigned candidate. Otherwise OR voters would fear that voting for a third-party candidate would deprive their preferred major-party candidate of electoral votes.

dougdougdoug,
@dougdougdoug@mastodon.social avatar

voters should support the referendum. But, if OR law obligates Presidential electors to cast their votes in the Electoral College for their assigned candidate, the OR legislature should fix that after the referendum passes.
https://olis.oregonlegislature.gov/liz/2023R1/Downloads/MeasureDocument/HB2004/Enrolled

thezerobit, to oregon
@thezerobit@anticapitalist.party avatar

I'm a huge fan of . Apparently, it's going to be on the ballot in Oregon in November 2024, and will apply to all statewide and federal elections including primaries. It's a huge boost for democracy, as it allows people to move past the party duopoly of Dem/GOP and vote for 3rd party candidates without fear of giving the election away to the greater of 2 evils.

Fun fact, I helped with the campaign to get passed in Benton County, Oregon in 2016.

Andres4NY, to nyc
@Andres4NY@social.ridetrans.it avatar

Ugh, I hate in person in so much.

The (paper) voter guide only lists my city council candidates. It does not list civil court judges or anyone else who might be on the ballot. You have to know to go to NYC DOE's website, go to "find my pollsite/view sample ballot" so see who's actually on the ballot.

You've gotta do this in advance of going to your poll site, and then (w/ ) memorize the order you want to vote for candidates in.

So stupid. Just universal , please!

petersuber, to USpolitics
@petersuber@fediscience.org avatar

Does . support ? It seems that he's taken no public position on it.

We won't have in all 50 states for the 2024 election. But and support RCV, and in that sense are at least hinting that they don't want to be spoiler candidates who hand the election to . Of course they may be spoiler candidates anyway. But is RFK even hinting that he doesn't want to be a spoiler candidate?

rbreich, to random
@rbreich@masto.ai avatar

It used to be Democrats versus Republicans, liberals versus conservatives, left versus right.

That is over.

It is now democracy versus authoritarianism.

The 2024 election is fast approaching. Know the stakes.

adirtyhippie,
@adirtyhippie@mastodon.online avatar

@rbreich It honestly feels too late to proselytize for , but is TRULY the one thing that I feel can save American democracy. Without it, this ever growing divide seems like it will never stop growing. https://bit.ly/RCVProCon

hunkabilly, to random
@hunkabilly@mas.to avatar

() is so easy it can be explained in 1 toot. Simply rank candidates in your order of preference; 1st favorite, 2nd favorite, etc. A candidate has to get >50% of the vote to win. If they don't there is an instant runoff (shown below) Source: http://linktr.ee/voterchoiceaz

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • JUstTest
  • kavyap
  • DreamBathrooms
  • khanakhh
  • mdbf
  • InstantRegret
  • magazineikmin
  • GTA5RPClips
  • modclub
  • rosin
  • Youngstown
  • slotface
  • everett
  • ethstaker
  • provamag3
  • thenastyranch
  • ngwrru68w68
  • tacticalgear
  • cubers
  • tester
  • Durango
  • anitta
  • normalnudes
  • osvaldo12
  • cisconetworking
  • Leos
  • megavids
  • lostlight
  • All magazines