glynmoody, to Amazon
@glynmoody@mastodon.social avatar

Should we trust 's -generated review ? - https://mashable.com/article/amazon-ai-generated-review-summaries "Great: more janky robots are telling us what to buy."

ghostdancer, to fediverse
@ghostdancer@mastodon.sdf.org avatar

Today is the day of #summaries of the old year and #resolutions for the new one.
There are several ways of facing it, one of them is the #Calvinism
Just in case, Happy and prosperous new year dear #fediverse ! 🥂 🤗 #NYE

cazabon, (edited ) to journalism

#Canadian #Legacy #Media: Hey govt, do us a solid and make #Google and #Facebook give us #money.

Govt: Uh, for what?

CLM: You know, because they have money, and we can't figure out how to get some ourselves.

Govt: I'm not sure...

CLM: You're #politicians, and you'll get to publicly stand up to #American #Big #Tech.

Govt: Sold!

Govt: Bill C-18 will make Big Tech #pay for the #privilege of #sharing #links to Canadian media.

1/x

#BigTech #CanadianMedia #C18 #consequences

cazabon, (edited )

Techies: So, and were driving to your by showing of your , with links back to your sites. Making them to do so made no sense, to them or anyone else, so they stopped linking to your sites.

: That's bad.

Techies: It's for all the good media. Wait, I meant media. Uh, media. Or ... what don't you call yourselves?

CLM: media.

Techies: .

14/x

petersuber, (edited ) to ai
@petersuber@fediscience.org avatar

1/ Here's a thought to advance to research. If it has problems, I think they're worth solving.

🧵

petersuber,
@petersuber@fediscience.org avatar
  1. Update. I've argued here that -generated needn't infringe the in the originals, even if some still do infringe.

AI companies are growing in confidence that they can now avoid that kind of infringement & even indemnify users sued for it.
https://techcrunch.com/2023/11/06/openai-promises-to-defend-business-customers-against-copyright-claims/

"IBM, Microsoft, Amazon, Getty Images, Shutterstock & Adobe are among those who’ve explicitly said they’ll indemnify generative AI customers over IP rights claims. Today, OpenAI joins that group."

petersuber, to ai
@petersuber@fediscience.org avatar

Good start on a hard question — how or whether to use #AI tools in #PeerReview.
https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-2587766/v1

"For the moment, we recommend that if #LLMs are used to write scholarly reviews, reviewers should disclose their use and accept full responsibility for their reports’ accuracy, tone, reasoning and originality."

PS: "For the moment" these tools can help reviewers string words together, not judge quality. We have good reasons to seek evaluative comments from human experts.

petersuber,
@petersuber@fediscience.org avatar

Update. I'm pulling a few other comments into this thread, in preparation for extending it later.

  1. I have mixed feelings on in peer review. I see the benefits, but I also see the benefits of .
    https://twitter.com/petersuber/status/1412455826397204487

  2. For today, good are a harder problem than good .
    https://fediscience.org/@petersuber/109954904433171308

  3. Truth detection is a deep, hard problem. Automating it is even harder.
    https://fediscience.org/@petersuber/109921214854932516

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • provamag3
  • cisconetworking
  • DreamBathrooms
  • mdbf
  • tacticalgear
  • ngwrru68w68
  • magazineikmin
  • thenastyranch
  • InstantRegret
  • Youngstown
  • slotface
  • everett
  • kavyap
  • cubers
  • JUstTest
  • Durango
  • ethstaker
  • GTA5RPClips
  • osvaldo12
  • khanakhh
  • rosin
  • normalnudes
  • tester
  • megavids
  • Leos
  • modclub
  • anitta
  • lostlight
  • All magazines