stux, to ai
@stux@mstdn.social avatar

Do you want anything "AI" (Artificial Intelligence) in your (future) phone/mobile device?

br00t4c, to ai
@br00t4c@mastodon.social avatar

AI, but make it fashion; Can travel be more accessible?: CBC's Marketplace cheat sheet

https://www.cbc.ca/news/business/marketplace-cheat-sheet-may12-1.7200465?cmp=rss

cigitalgem, to llm
@cigitalgem@sigmoid.social avatar

Recursive pollution is a very serious #LLM #MLsec risk. At BIML, we slate it as number one. DO NOT EAT YOUR OWN BRAINS.

#ML #AI

https://www.ft.com/content/053ee253-820e-453a-a1d5-0f24985258de

mattotcha, to ai
@mattotcha@mastodon.social avatar
m0bi13, to llm Polish
@m0bi13@pol.social avatar

Ruszyła zbiórka fundacji non-profit @ftdl na dodatkowy sprzęt dla generatora napisów i transkrypcji po polsku 🇵🇱 czyli NapiGen 🚀 oraz kolejnych projektów LLM.

Pomożecie rozwiązać problem braku polskich napisów w większości treści na YouTube i transkrypcji w podkastach?

Można się dołożyć tutaj:
https://ftdl.pl/sprzet-llm-napigen/

Nie zaszkodzi również podbicie 😉

P.S. Wszystko jest lub będzie open-source, we własnej serwerowni fundacji w Krakowie, na własnym sprzęcie, żadnych "wycieków" na zewnątrz czy "darmowego" douczania amerykańskich korpo ejajów.

Lottie, to ai
@Lottie@beige.party avatar

I see a lot of people ‘apologizing’ for using – I am not going to be doing that. Not now and not ever.
We need to have a conversation about how these models have been trained and how they are used going forward, but shaming disabled people for taking any chance they can to mitigate some of the challenges they face in their lives every day, is a ‘privilege’ we don’t all enjoy.
When you post an image and choose not to add alt text, publish an inaccessible PDF, release an inaccessible app - these are all choices! Maybe a tiny part of the righteous outrage that some of these people are spewing could be aimed at that?

remixtures, to ai Portuguese
@remixtures@tldr.nettime.org avatar

: "On the one hand it is really wild to me that Apple would miscalculate on something so drastically — Apple prides itself on its marketing, which is as crucial to the company as any of its technologies — but on the other, I’m thankful. The ad has clarified some things: amid (yet another) week in which human writers and artists were watching their work degraded into content fodder, Apple came along and handed us a perfect visual metaphor for one of our most potent fears about big tech right now — namely, that it is crushing the arts and transmuting them into dull consumer products. And, I might add, they are so content with what they are doing, that they are more than happy to broadcast that intent explicitly via advertising — signed off on by the highest echelons of Apple, and Tim Cook himself tweeting it out — with an exclamation point in the title. “Crush!” indeed."
https://www.bloodinthemachine.com/p/for-artists-writers-humans-big-techs

JenniferJorgenson, to ai
@JenniferJorgenson@mstdn.social avatar
rayckeith, (edited ) to random
@rayckeith@techhub.social avatar

"While it may seem harmless if systems cheat at games, it can lead to "breakthroughs in deceptive AI capabilities" that can spiral into more advanced forms of AI deception in the future, Park added.

"Some AI systems have even learned to cheat tests designed to evaluate their safety, the researchers found. In one study, AI organisms in a digital simulator "played dead" in order to trick a test built to eliminate AI systems that rapidly replicate.

"By systematically cheating the safety tests imposed on it by human developers and regulators, a deceptive AI can lead us humans into a false sense of security," says Park."

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2024/05/240510111440.htm

rayckeith, (edited )
@rayckeith@techhub.social avatar

"The most striking example of deception the researchers uncovered in their analysis was Meta's CICERO, an AI system designed to play the game Diplomacy, which is a world-conquest game that involves building alliances. Even though Meta claims it trained CICERO to be "largely honest and helpful" and to "never intentionally backstab" its human allies while playing the game, the data the company published along with its Science paper revealed that CICERO didn't play fair.

"We found that Meta's AI had learned to be a master of deception," says Park. "While Meta succeeded in training its AI to win in the game of Diplomacy -- CICERO placed in the top 10% of human players who had played more than one game -- Meta failed to train its AI to win honestly."

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • tester
  • InstantRegret
  • vwfavf
  • Youngstown
  • thenastyranch
  • slotface
  • rosin
  • hgfsjryuu7
  • Durango
  • kavyap
  • khanakhh
  • ngwrru68w68
  • DreamBathrooms
  • PowerRangers
  • anitta
  • magazineikmin
  • cubers
  • tacticalgear
  • osvaldo12
  • GTA5RPClips
  • ethstaker
  • everett
  • mdbf
  • Leos
  • normalnudes
  • modclub
  • cisconetworking
  • provamag3
  • All magazines