jonny, to random
@jonny@neuromatch.social avatar

A future for the web is the radical idea that its bad to put all data in a single place owned by 3 companies and rented by a few hundred. The internet wasnt a mistake, the cloud was a mistake. Platforms were a mistake. A mistake where its not only possible but routine for "everyone's health data" to get stolen. https://infosec.exchange/@patrickcmiller/112341111375581551

I need to share my health data with like 3 people that arent me. Why on earth is that data in the same pile as literally everyone else's.

jonny,
@jonny@neuromatch.social avatar
banned_tweets_of_john_cusack, to Palestine
@banned_tweets_of_john_cusack@mastodon.social avatar

@palestine

This courageous young Sofia Orr was sentenced to twenty days in for her refusal to serve in the .
Like her , Sofia is a real for .

rOpenSci, to rstats Spanish
@rOpenSci@hachyderm.io avatar

📦 [A package a day - Taxonomy 2]

Today's Taxonomy package is dwctaxon

Edit and Validate Darwin Core Taxon Data
🙏 Maintained by @joelnitta
📝 https://docs.ropensci.org/dwctaxon/

Check out this article: What is DwC?
🗺️ https://docs.ropensci.org/dwctaxon/articles/what-is-dwc.html

-reviewed




@rstats

Learning to Discern the Voices of Gods, Spirits, Tulpas, and the Dead - Oxford Academic - Schizophrenia Bulletin, Volume 49, Issue Supplement_1, March 2023 (academic.oup.com)

There are communities in which hearing voices frequently is common and expected, and in which participants are not expected to have a need for care. This paper compares the ideas and practices of these communities....

gimulnautti, to science
@gimulnautti@mastodon.green avatar

I nice reminder, that since late most papers in advanced AI have come from people working at: Mega large companies for profit.

Which raises an important question: How is profit and science supposed mix, if peer-review has been impossible due to witholding data?

If a paper can’t be verified, is it science? Science is, after all, an inter-subjective process.

So are these papers more truthfully just fancy forms of advertisements?

https://www.vice.com/en/article/wxjdg5/scary-emergent-ai-abilities-are-just-a-mirage-produced-by-researchers-stanford-study-says

dezene, to random

, for which I am an , has always offered authors the opportunity to the history alongside their accepted . There are a number of benefits to this including adding and .

This policy will now be mandatory for all papers submitted starting 13 Feb 2023.

never have to reveal their identity, but reviews will get credit and credit towards publication in the journal.

See: https://peerj.com/blog/post/115284886994/peerj-at-10-now-all-peerj-articles-will-be-published-with-their-entire-peer-review-history/

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • JUstTest
  • GTA5RPClips
  • DreamBathrooms
  • everett
  • magazineikmin
  • Durango
  • InstantRegret
  • Youngstown
  • mdbf
  • slotface
  • rosin
  • thenastyranch
  • kavyap
  • ethstaker
  • megavids
  • tacticalgear
  • cubers
  • cisconetworking
  • osvaldo12
  • khanakhh
  • ngwrru68w68
  • modclub
  • tester
  • anitta
  • normalnudes
  • Leos
  • provamag3
  • lostlight
  • All magazines