markarayner, to Humor
@markarayner@mas.to avatar
kristinHenry, to random
@kristinHenry@vis.social avatar

Apparently, this old article of mine is getting some new attention.

https://medium.com/p/df2e8ccb5f76

If you don't have a medium account, here's a friend link: https://kristinhenry.medium.com/in-defense-of-pie-charts-and-why-you-shouldnt-use-them-df2e8ccb5f76?sk=94500fba6dcc32727aefe7306b04d3fe

Suddenly, folks are interested in Pie Charts.

errantscience, (edited ) to science

If you ever find yourself thinking “would this graph be better in 3D” the answer is always no⁠ ⁠

ChemicalEyeGuy,
@ChemicalEyeGuy@mstdn.science avatar

@errantscience etc… ✅

But to restrict depiction of (including Bader et al.’s ⬇️) to two-dimensions would take back 150 years, when chemists were ridiculed for believing molecules had a three-dimensional structure!

https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article-abstract/70/9/4316/88468/Quantum-topology-of-molecular-charge-distributions?redirectedFrom=fulltext

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • JUstTest
  • kavyap
  • DreamBathrooms
  • thenastyranch
  • magazineikmin
  • osvaldo12
  • khanakhh
  • Youngstown
  • mdbf
  • slotface
  • rosin
  • everett
  • ngwrru68w68
  • Durango
  • anitta
  • InstantRegret
  • GTA5RPClips
  • cubers
  • ethstaker
  • normalnudes
  • tacticalgear
  • cisconetworking
  • tester
  • Leos
  • modclub
  • megavids
  • provamag3
  • lostlight
  • All magazines