brainfreeze avatar

brainfreeze

@brainfreeze@kbin.social
GottaLaff, to legal
@GottaLaff@mastodon.social avatar

Via Scott MacFarlane:

!! Judge : Neither of the proposed trial dates is acceptable

Judge Chutkan: "Setting a trial date should not depend on a person's professional obligations. Mr Trump will have to make this work.. regardless of his schedule"

flexghost, to random
@flexghost@mastodon.social avatar

Congressman, and constitutional scholar, Jamie Raskin

“Section 3 of the 14th Amendment presents a clear and unequivocal statement that anyone who has sworn an oath of office…who engage in insurrection or rebellion…can never serve again in federal or state office”

Here’s hoping the constitution still matters.

video/mp4

Zeus,

but what if going away makes it worse? .world’s downtime has only increased since i made my l.ee acct

The Twilight Zones of Rod Serling - all of them (movie-web.app)

There is a fifth dimension, beyond that which is known to man. It is a dimension as vast as space and as timeless as infinity. It is the middle ground between light and shadow, between science and superstition, and it lies between the pit of man's fears and the summit of his knowledge. This is the dimension of imagination. It is...

ct_bergstrom, to random
@ct_bergstrom@fediscience.org avatar

It's pure coincidence that Elon Musk just happened to erase the entire record of how twitter was used to organize and share photos and video from Arab Spring, right?

America's richest 10% are responsible for 40% of its planet-heating pollution, new report finds | CNN Business (edition.cnn.com)

America’s wealthiest people are also some of the world’s biggest polluters – not only because of their massive homes and private jets, but because of the fossil fuels generated by the companies they invest their money in.

Joe Biden’s DOJ Is Claiming “There Is No Constitutional Right to a Stable Climate” (jacobin.com)

In the same week large swaths of the US were under extreme heat warnings, Joe Biden’s Justice Department filed its most recent motion to dismiss a landmark climate case by arguing that nothing in the Constitution guarantees the right to a secure climate.

Pons_Aelius,

the US would have to invade any country that endangers the climate for is citizens to ensure that right.

The US has invaded several countries to ensure their citizens have the right to cheap oil, which is also not covered in the constitution.

UFO64,

By that logic, they cannot guarantee the freedom of speech either though. They can try very hard, and do their best to make amends for when it’s breached, but many people have been silenced illegally by the US government. They can try, but they cannot promise this fact.

I don’t see why one couldn’t apply the same to climate.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • JUstTest
  • kavyap
  • DreamBathrooms
  • cubers
  • magazineikmin
  • InstantRegret
  • GTA5RPClips
  • thenastyranch
  • Youngstown
  • rosin
  • slotface
  • osvaldo12
  • ngwrru68w68
  • ethstaker
  • provamag3
  • everett
  • Durango
  • Leos
  • cisconetworking
  • mdbf
  • khanakhh
  • normalnudes
  • tester
  • modclub
  • anitta
  • tacticalgear
  • megavids
  • lostlight
  • All magazines