mina,
@mina@berlin.social avatar

There was a time, when I dearly loved and , and they will always have a sweet spot in my heart for the many laughs and for all the cultural heritage, they left us.

However: Whenever I now grab one of their , their style and language feels terribly outdated and, frankly, boring to me.

Unpopular opinion, or do you agree?

ab78702,
@ab78702@fosstodon.org avatar

@mina I don't quite agree. These two authors plus @neilhimself write stuff that appeal to me no matter how many times I've read it. For Douglas Adams I can somewhat understand as was a bit overplayed (plus is not my thing) but otoh, the Dirk Gently holistic detective series is a lot more enjoyable and timeless to me.

mina,
@mina@berlin.social avatar

@ab78702

It's totally fine. I was just curious, if other "fans" had the same feeling as I.

So far, not so many.

@neilhimself

NormanDunbar,
@NormanDunbar@mastodon.scot avatar

@mina I respectfully disagree. I've been reading Terry's books for decades. I still enjoy them today.

mina,
@mina@berlin.social avatar

@NormanDunbar

This is totally fine. I have enjoyed them so much in the past, and I totally get it.

If I am becoming senile or so, you don't have to.

NormanDunbar,
@NormanDunbar@mastodon.scot avatar

@mina Mind you, it has been said that I have a weird sense of humour, which might explain the attraction.

Have a great day.

VulcanTourist,
@VulcanTourist@mastodon.social avatar

@mina

What about Piers Anthony?

mina,
@mina@berlin.social avatar

@VulcanTourist

I don't think I have read anything by him.

PeterPractice,
@PeterPractice@toot.community avatar

@mina agree

mina,
@mina@berlin.social avatar

@PeterPractice

You're one of very few. 🤜 🤛

skittles,
@skittles@berlin.social avatar

@mina I have issues putting DA and TP in a bucket, they both were great comedic writers, but they differ greatly in language and style.

DA was way more absurd and dadaistic, and I still think it holds up today. I think what you feel there might be that it has been quoted and referenced to death by now.

With TP it’s way more complicated, since you also need to factor in his illness, which clearly shows in his later works, there’s a huge difference in style over his career. 1/2

skittles,
@skittles@berlin.social avatar

But to be honest, while I love the world and the characters of Discworld, I never found him to be a strong writer. I like a few books, but there’s a whole lot of filler material in his work, and I think he peaked in the late 80s early 90s.

mina,
@mina@berlin.social avatar

@skittles

With Pratchett's peak years being the late 80s/early 90s, I totally agree.

I'd like to add: If somebody has a thing for absurd humour and/or likes SF and doesn't know either of the two, I would still recommend them.

Their works are just part of the canon.

ManniCalavera,
@ManniCalavera@openbiblio.social avatar

@mina I love Pratchett just as the next guy, but some books are just better than others. I remember that Moving Pictures and Soul Music were very labored, and the Nightwatch books were always a hit, except "Guards! Guards!", which was merely good.
So maybe you picked a "wrong" one?

mina,
@mina@berlin.social avatar

@ManniCalavera

As I said: I've been a huge fan in the past, so I don't think, the specific selection is the problem.

It's also not that I consider Pratchett to be bad, just as somewhat dated.

TheNovemberMan,
@TheNovemberMan@bookstodon.com avatar

@mina I still occasionally re-read both, with a smile.
But just my opinion.

mina,
@mina@berlin.social avatar

@TheNovemberMan

Totally fine! As long as you enjoy them, please do so!

spidermedic,
@spidermedic@techhub.social avatar

@mina Sure digital watches are outdated, but Douglas Adams’ story telling and use of language is funny every time I read it.

mina,
@mina@berlin.social avatar

@spidermedic

The digital watches and other anachronisms don't hurt, IMO.

It's rather his language, I find too chatty and not really funny any more.

agitatra,
@agitatra@berlin.social avatar

@mina I'd agree that Terry Pratchett became a little bit repetitive later, but reading Douglas Adams is for me as funny as it was forty years ago.

mina,
@mina@berlin.social avatar

@agitatra

That's great! I remember, how much I enjoyed reading him, back in the days.

If you could keep that feeling: Perfect!

claralistensprechen3rd,

@mina Nope. I expect you're bored because you've already read them.
Their wordcraft remains timeless.

mina,
@mina@berlin.social avatar

@claralistensprechen3rd

The thing is: I love re-reading books.

There are hundreds, I read twice and at least a few dozen, I read five times and still some, I read more than ten times.

So, I don't think this is the issue.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • books
  • ethstaker
  • DreamBathrooms
  • InstantRegret
  • tacticalgear
  • magazineikmin
  • Youngstown
  • thenastyranch
  • mdbf
  • slotface
  • rosin
  • modclub
  • kavyap
  • cubers
  • osvaldo12
  • JUstTest
  • khanakhh
  • cisconetworking
  • Durango
  • everett
  • ngwrru68w68
  • Leos
  • normalnudes
  • GTA5RPClips
  • tester
  • anitta
  • provamag3
  • megavids
  • lostlight
  • All magazines